Browse > Article

The Comparison of Characteristics of Foot pressure between Treadmill and Ground walking in Normal person  

Kim, Ji-Hye (Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation and Healthy Science, Graduate School of Yongin University)
Oh, Tae-Young (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Medical life science, Silla University)
Publication Information
Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine / v.5, no.1, 2010 , pp. 53-61 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose : The purpose of this study is to compare the distribution of foot pressure, knee and ankle joint angle between treadmill walking and ground walking in normal person. Methods : 18 Person of subject has participated this study, let subject to walk in ground and treadmill in order to gain data of foot distribution and knee, ankle joint angle using by parotec system. and Dartfish system. Walking velocity was constrained by 2Km/h and more 10sec. Date analysis was used by paired-t test using SPSS/PC statistical programs for window. Results : Result show that total contact times has shown symmetry between both legs, and more increase of left foot pressure in treadmill walking. Foot pressure of treadmill walking was significantly decreased in right hind foot and fore foot and hallux area. The ankle joint angle of treadmill walking was significantly decreased in initial contact phase. Conclusion : Results of this study show that foot pressure of treadmill walking was more decreased than ground walking in right hind foot and fore foot, hallux area. And the ankle joint angle of treadmill walking was significantly decreased in initial contact phase.
Keywords
Foot pressure; Treadmill walking; Ground walking;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Glitsch U, Baumann W. The three-dimensional determination of internal loads in the lower extremity. J Biomech.1997;30(11):1123-1131.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Herzog W. Individual muscle force estimations using a non-liner optimal design. J Neurosci Methods. 1987;21:167-179.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Pedotti A, Krishnan VV, Stark L. Optimization of muscle force sequencing in human locomotion. Math Biosci. 1978;38(1-2):57-76.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Seireg A, Arvikar RJ. The prediction of muscular load sharing and joint forces in the lower extremities during walking. J Biomechanics. 1975;8(2):89-102   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Perry J. Gait analysis. New Jersey. Slack. 1992.
6 Pierrynowski MR, Morrison JB. Estimating the muscle forces generated in the human lower extremity when walking; A physiological solution. Math Biosci. 1985;75(1):43-68.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 김좌준, 노민희, 구봉오 등. 속도-의존적 체중지지 트레드밀 보행이 뇌졸중 환자의 보행에 미치는영향. 대한물리치료학회지. 2005;17(3):339-350.   과학기술학회마을
8 권혁철, 김인숙. 독립보행이 가능한 편마비 환자의하지 체중지지 특성에 관한 고찰. 대한물리치료학회지, 1988;9(1):1-11.
9 Inman VT. Human locomotion. Can Med Assoc J. 1966;94:1047-1054.
10 Kernozek TW, LaMott EE. Comparison of plantar pressure between the eldery and young adults. Gait Posture. 1995;3(1):31-48.
11 Hamil J, Bates BT, Kinneth HG. Timing of lower extremity joint actions during treadmill running. Med Sci Sports Exercise. 1992;24(7):807-813
12 Miller EW, Quinn ME, Seddon PG. Body weight support treadmill and overground ambulation training for two patient with chronic disability secondary to stroke. Phys ther. 2002;82(1):53-61
13 Pedersen DR, Brand RA, Cheng C et al. Direct comparison of muscle force predictions using linear and nonlinerar programming. J Biomech Eng. 1987;109(3):192-198.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Gottschall JS., Kram R. Ground reaction forces during downhill and uphill running. J Biomech. 2005;38(3): 445-452.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Bowker P, Messenger N. The measurement of gait. Clin Rehabil. 1988;2(2):89-97.
16 Hesse S, Bertelt C, Jahnke M.T. Treadmill training with partial weight bearing support compared with physiotherapy nonambulatory hemiparetic patient. Stroke, 1995;26:976-981.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Goldberg EJ, Kautz SA., Neptune RR. Can treadmill walking be used to assess propulsion generation. J Biomech. 2008;41(8):1805-1808.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Dimitrigevic MR, Larsson LE.. Neural control of gait: clinical neruophysiological Appl Neurophysiol. 1981;44(1-3):152-159.
19 Crowninshield RD, Brand RA. A physiologically based criterion of muscle force prediction in locomotion. J Biomech. 1981;14(11):93-801.
20 Bohannon RW. Gait performance of hemiparetic stroke patients: selected variables. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68(11):777-781.
21 조규권, 김유신. 트레드밀 보행 시 경사도와 속도에 따른 보행 형태의 운동학적 분석. 한국운동역학회지. 2001;11(2):175-191.
22 노정석, 김택훈. Parotec system을 이용한 족저압 측정의 신뢰도. 한국전문물리치료학회지. 2001;8(3):35-41.
23 Silver KH., Marko RF, Forrest LW et al. Effect of aerobic treadmill training on gait velocity, cadence, and gait symmetry in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a preliminary report. Neurorehabil Neural repair, 2000;14(1):65-71   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Simoneau GG. Kinesiology of Walking. In: Neumann DA. Kinesiology of the Musculoskeletal System. Mosby. 2002.
25 Bean J.C, Chaffin C.B, Schultz A.B. Biomechanical model calculation of muscle contraction forces: a double Linear programming method. J Biomech. 1988;21(1):59-66.   DOI   ScienceOn