Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2015.31.5.449

Comparison of OC and EC Measurement Results Determined by Thermal-optical Analysis Protocols  

Kim, Hyosun (Center for Gas analysis, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science)
Jung, Jinsang (Center for Gas analysis, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science)
Lee, Jinhong (Department of Environmental Engineering, Chungnam National University)
Lee, Sangil (Center for Gas analysis, Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science)
Publication Information
Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment / v.31, no.5, 2015 , pp. 449-460 More about this Journal
Abstract
Carbonaceous aerosol is generally classified into OC (organic carbon) and EC (elemental carbon) by thermal optical analysis. Both NIOSH (National institute of occupational safety and health) with high temperature (HighT) and IMPROVE-A (Interagency monitoring of protected visual environments) with low temperature (LowT) protocols are widely used. In this study, both protocols were applied for ambient $PM_{2.5}$ samples (Daejeon, Korea) in order to underpin differences in OC and EC measurements. An excellent agreement between NIOSH and IMPROVE-A protocol was observed for TC (total carbon). However, significant differences between OC and EC appeared and the differences were larger for EC than OC. The main differences between two protocols are temperature profile and charring correction method. For the same charring correction method, HighT_OC was 10% higher than LowT_ OC, while HighT_EC was 15% and 33% lower than LowT_EC for TOT (thermal-optical transmittance) and TOR (thermal-optical reflectance), respectively. This difference may be caused by the temperature of OC4 in He step and possibly difference in POC (pryorilized OC) formation. For the same temperature profile, OC by TOT was about 26% higher than that by TOR. In contrast, EC by TOT was about 50% lower than that by TOR. POC was also dependent on both temperature profile and the charring correction method, showing much distinctive differences for the charring correction method (i.e., POC by TOT to POC by TOR ratio is about 2). This difference might be caused by different characteristics between transmittance and reflectance for monitoring POC formation within filters. Results from this study showed that OC and EC depends on applied analysis protocol as shown other studies. Because of the nature of the thermal optical analysis, it may not be possible to have an absolute standard analysis protocol that is applicable for any ambient $PM_{2.5}$. Nevertheless, in order to provide consistent measurement results for scientists and policy makers, future studies should focus on developing a harmonized standard analysis protocol that is suitable for a specific air domain and minimizes variations in OC and EC measurement results. In addition, future elaborate studies are required to find and understand the causes of the differences.
Keywords
Carbonaceous aerosol; Organic carbon; Elemental carbon; Thermal-optical analysis; Temperature profile;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Chow, J.C., J.G. Watson, D. Crow, D.H. Lowenthal, and T. Merrifield (2001) Comparison of IMPROVE and NIOSH carbon measurements, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 34(1), 23-34.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Chow, J.C., J.G. Watson, L.C. Pritchett, W.R. Pierson, C.A. Frazier, and R.G. Purcell (1993) The DRI thermal/ optical reflectance carbon analysis system: description, evaluation and applications in US air quality studies, Atmos. Environ., Part A. General Topics, 27(8), 1185-1201.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Chow, J.C., J.G. Watson, L.W.A. Chen, W.P. Arnott, H. Moosmüller, and K. Fung (2004) Equivalence of elemental carbon by thermal/optical reflectance and transmittance with different temperature protocols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38(16), 4414-4422.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Jacob, D.J. and D.A. Winner (2009) Effect of climate change on air quality, Atmos. Environ., 43(1), 51-63.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Kaufman, Y., D. Tanre, and O. Boucher (2002) A Satellite View of Aerosols in the Climate System, Nature, 219: 215-223.
6 Khan, B., M.D. Hays, C. Geron, and J. Jetter (2012) Differences in the OC/EC ratios that characterize ambient and source aerosols due to thermal-optical analysis, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 46(2), 127-137.   DOI
7 Kim, H., J. Jung, J. Lee, and S. Lee (2015) Seasonal characteristics of organic carbon and elemental carbon in $PM_{2.5}$ in Daejeon, J. Korean Soc. Atmos. Environ., 31(1), 28-40. (in Korean with English abstract)   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Laden, F., J. Schwartz, F.E. Speizer, and D.W. Dockery (2006) Reduction in fine particulate air pollution and mortality: extended follow-up of the Harvard Six Cities study, Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., 173(6), 667-672.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Lohmann, U. and J. Feichter (2005) Global indirect aerosol effects: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5(3), 715-737.   DOI
10 Panteliadis, P., T. Hafkenscheid, B. Cary, E. Diapouli, A. Fischer, O. Favez, P. Quincey, M. Viana, R. Hitzenberger, R. Vecchi, D. Saraga, J. Sciare, J.L. Jaffrezo, A. John, J. Schwarz, M. Giannoni, J. Novak, A. Karanasiou, P. Fermo, and W. Maenhaut (2015) ECOC comparison exercise with identical thermal protocols after temperature offset correction-instrument diagnostics by in-depth evaluation of operational parameters. Atmos. Meas. Techn., 8(2), 779-792.   DOI
11 Park, S.S., M.S. Bae, J.J. Schauer, S.Y. Ryu, Y.J. Kim, S.Y. Cho, and S.J. Kim (2005) Evaluation of the TMO and TOT methods for OC and EC measurements and their characteristics in $PM_{2.5}$ at an urban site of Korea during ACE-Asia, Atmos. Environ., 39(28), 5101-5112.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Peterson, M.R. and M.H. Richards (2002) Thermal-opticaltransmittance analysis for organic, elemental, carbonate, total carbon, and OCX2 in $PM_{2.5}$ by the EPA/NIOSH method, Proceedings of Symposium on Air Quality Measurement Methods and Technology-2002, Air & Waste Management Association, Pittsburgh, PA, 83-1-83-19.
13 Piazzalunga, A., V. Bernardoni, P. Fermo, G. Valli, and R. Vecchi (2011) Technical Note: On the effect of water-soluble compounds removal on EC quantification by TOT analysis in urban aerosol samples, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11(19), 10193-10203.   DOI
14 Pope, C.A., J.B. Muhlestein, H.T. May, D.G. Renlund, J.L. Anderson, and B.D. Horne (2006) Ischemic heart disease events triggered by short-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution, Circulation, 114(23), 2443-2448.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Schauer, J.J., B.T. Mader, J.T. Deminter, G. Heidemann, M.S. Bae, J.H. Seinfeld, R.C. Flagan, R.A. Cary, D. Smith, S. Howell, J.T. Kline, P. Quinn, T. Bates, B. Turpin, H.J. Lim, J.Z. Yu, H. Yang, and M.D. Keywood (2003) ACE-Asia intercomparison of a thermal- optical method for the determination of particle- phase organic and elemental carbon, Environ. Sci. Technol., 37(5), 993-1001.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Birch, M.E. and R.A. Cary (1996) Elemental carbon-based method for monitoring occupational exposures to particulate diesel exhaust, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 25(3), 221-241.   DOI
17 Schmid, H., L. Laskus, H.J. Abraham, U. Baltensperger, V. Lavanchy, M. Bizjak, P. Burba, H. Cachier, D. Crow, J. Chow, T. Gnauk, A. Even, H.M. ten Brink, K.P. Giesen, R. Hitzenberger, C. Hueglin, W. Maenhaut, C. Pio, A. Carvalho, J.P. Putaud, D. Toom-Sauntry, and H. Puxbaum (2001) Results of the "carbon conference" international aerosol carbon round robin test stage I, Atmos. Environ., 35(12), 2111-2121.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Slaughter, J.C., E. Kim, L. Sheppard, J.H. Sullivan, T.V. Larson, and C. Claiborn (2004) Association between particulate matter and emergency room visits, hospital admissions and mortality in Spokane, Washington, J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol., 15(2), 153-159.
19 Yu, J.Z., J. Xu, and H. Yang (2002) Charring characteristics of atmospheric organic particulate matter in thermal analysis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36(4), 754-761.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Birch, M.E. (1998) Analysis of carbonaceous aerosols: interlaboratory comparison, Analyst, 123(5), 851-857.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Cavalli, F., M. Viana, K.E. Yttri, J. Genberg, and J.P. Putaud (2010) Toward a standardised thermal-optical protocol for measuring atmospheric organic and elemental carbon: the EUSAAR protocol, Atmos. Meas. Techn., 3(1), 79-89.   DOI
22 Chen, L.W.A., J.C. Chow, J.G. Watson, H. Moosmüller, and W.P. Arnott (2004) Modeling reflectance and transmittance of quartz-fiber filter samples containing elemental carbon particles: Implications for thermal/optical analysis, J. Aerosol Sci., 35(6), 765-780.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Cheng, Y., K.B. He, F.K. Duan, M. Zheng, Y.L. Ma, J.H. Tan, and Z.Y. Du (2010) Improved measurement of carbonaceous aerosol: evaluation of the sampling artifacts and inter-comparison of the thermal-optical analysis methods, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10(17), 8533-8548.   DOI
24 Cheng, Y., M. Zheng, K.B. He, Y. Chen, B. Yan, A.G. Russell, W. Shi, Z. Jiao, G. Sheng, J. Fu, and E.S. Edgerton (2011a) Comparison of two thermal-optical methods for the determination of organic carbon and elemental carbon: Results from the southeastern United States, Atmos. Environ., 45(11), 1913-1918.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Cheng, Y., F.K. Duan, K.B. He, M. Zheng, Z.Y. Du, Y.L. Ma, and J.H. Tan (2011b) Intercomparison of thermaloptical methods for the determination of organic and elemental carbon: influences of aerosol composition and implications, Environ. Sci. Technol., 45(23), 10117-10123.   DOI   ScienceOn