Browse > Article

A Study on the possibility to apply the characteristics of New Urbanism and our country in a new city business seen from the point of view of modernism and post-modernism - Focus on Eunpyung Newtown No. 1 District -  

Park, Jong-Hyun (국민대학교 일반대학원 건축계획전공)
Lee, Jong-Ryul (경민대학교 건축인테리어과)
Publication Information
Journal of The Korean Digital Architecture Interior Association / v.12, no.4, 2012 , pp. 107-116 More about this Journal
Abstract
Planning a major change in the domestic residential complex 'complex' in the 'city' to the influx of urban space. So, considering a set of self-environmental complex of openness and connectivity between cities inflow from residential urban housing is formed. Complex-oriented development approach and apartment high-rise and high-density regions of space and social disconnection that causes a uniform methodology that can solve the problem of housing plan, however, a recent New Urbanism New Urbanism has been introduced. And intravenous forms of communal life that occurred in the United States prior to World War II, this value is based on the main form. Design reorganizes This modern lifestyle factors (such as housing, jobs, shopping, leisure space) to go back to the traditional lifestyles while Neotradiotional Planning exercise. New Urbanism in the late 20th century, some literature refers to a postmodern approach adopted in the field of urban planning, the specific case. Actually important feature of post-modernism in the New Urbanism has been expressed. Problem is very confusing, and the principles of New Urbanism, New Urbanism, even those who claim that have different social and design views. Therefore, this study explores the postmodern tendencies of the New Urbanism, and based on this, the possibilities for the development of new towns in Korea mainly affected on the theory of New Urbanism in South Korea in Eunpyeong examine.
Keywords
New Urbanism; Postmodernism; Modernism; Eunpyung Newtown;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ellin, N, Postmodern Urbanism, Cambridge; Blackwell Publishers, 1996
2 Burns, C. et al, Urban or Suburban?, Harvard Design Megazine, 1. 1997
3 Moule, E, 제16조, 뉴어바니즘 협회, 뉴어바니즘 헌장, 안영태.온건혁 옮김, 한울출판사, 2003
4 Oranje, M, Planning and the Postmodern Turn, Planning Futures, ed P. Allmendinger and M. Tewder-Jones, London; Routledge, 2002
5 Talen, E. Sense of Community and Neighborhood Form: An Assessment of the Social Doctrine of New Urbanism, Urban Studies, 36(8), 1999
6 이지혜, 뉴어바니즘이론에 근거한 도시형 집합주거단지 계획특성에 관한 연구, 중앙대학교 석사논문, 2010.8
7 김홍순, 뉴어바니즘, 근대적 접근인가, 탈근대적 접근인가?, 한국도시행정학회 도시행정학보, 제19집 제2호, 2006.8
8 박영춘.류중석, 뉴어바니즘 도시설계의 가능성과 한계성에 관한 연구, 대한건축학회 제16권 5호(통권139), 2000