Browse > Article

Genotoxicity and Identification of Differentially Expressed Genes of Formaldehyde in human Jurkat Cells  

Kim, Youn-Jung (Cellular and Molecular Toxicology Laboratory, Korea Institute of Science and Technology)
Kim, Mi-Soon (Cellular and Molecular Toxicology Laboratory, Korea Institute of Science and Technology)
Ryu, Jae-Chun (Cellular and Molecular Toxicology Laboratory, Korea Institute of Science and Technology)
Publication Information
Molecular & Cellular Toxicology / v.1, no.4, 2005 , pp. 230-236 More about this Journal
Abstract
Formaldehyde is a common environmental contaminant found in tobacco smoke, paint, garments, diesel and exhaust, and medical and industrial products. Formaldehyde has been considered to be potentially carcinogenic, making it a subject of major environmental concern. However, only a little information on the mechanism of immunological sensitization and asthma by this compound has been known. So, we performed with Jurkat cell line, a human T lymphocyte, to assess the induction of DNA damage and to identify the DEGs related to immune response or toxicity by formaldehyde. In this study, we investigated the induction of DNA single strand breaks by formaldehyde using single cell gel electrophoresis assay (comet assay). And we compared gene expression between control and formaldehyde treatment to identify genes that are specifically or predominantly expressed by employing annealing control primer (ACP)-based $GeneFishing^{TM}$ method. The cytotoxicity ($IC_{30}$) of formaldehyde was determined above the 0.65 mM in Jurkat cell in 48 h treatment. Based on the $IC_{30}$ value from cytotoxicity test, we performed the comet assay in this concentration. From these results, 0.65 mM of formaldehyde was not revealed significant DNA damages in the absence of S-9 metabolic activation system. And the one differentially expressed gene (DEG) of formaldehyde was identified to zinc finger protein 292 using $GeneFishing^{TM}$ method. Through further investigation, we will identify more meaningful and useful DEGs on formaldehyde, and then can get the information on the associated mechanism and pathway with immune response or other toxicity by formaldehyde exposure.
Keywords
Formaldehyde; genotoxicity; comet assay; GeneFishing; Differentially Expressed Gene (DEG);
Citations & Related Records

Times Cited By Web Of Science : 9  (Related Records In Web of Science)
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Flyvholm, M.A. & Andersen, P. Identification of formaldehyde releasers and occurrence of formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers in registered chemical products. Am. J. Ind. Med. 24, 533-552 (1993)   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Kucharczyk, N., Yang, J.T., Wong, K.K. & Sofia, R.D. The formaldehyde-donating activity of N5, N10-methylene tetrahydrofolic acid in xenobiotic biotransformation. Xenobiotica 14, 667-676 (1984)   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Recio, L. et al. p53 mutations in formaldehyde-induced nasal squamous cell carcinomas in rats. Cancer Res. 52, 6113-6116 (1992)
4 Ito, K., Sakamoto, T. & Hayashi, Y. Role of tachykinin and bradykinin receptors and mast cells in gaseous formaldehyde-induced airway microvascular leakage in rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 307, 291-298 (1996)   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Hwang, I.T. et al. Annealing control primer system for improving specificity of PCR amplification. Biotechniques 35, 1180-1184 (2003)
6 Merk, O. & Speit, G. Detection of crosslinks with the comet assay in relationship to genotoxicity and cytotoxicity. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 33, 167-172 (1999)   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Baba, K., Yagi, T. & Niwa, S. Measurement of formaldehyde- specific IgE antibodies in adult asthmatics. Jpn. J. Allergol. 49, 404-411 (2000)
8 Kramps, J.A. et al. Measurement of specific IgE antibodies in individuals exposed to formaldehyde. Clin. Exp. Allergy 19, 509-514 (1989)   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Kedderis, G.L.& Hollenderg, P.F.Peroxidase-cat-alyzed Ndemethylation reactions substrate deuterium isotope effects. J.Biol.Chen. 259,3663-3668(1984)
10 Bardana, E.J. & Montanaro, A. Formaldehyde: an analysis of its respiratory, cutaneous,and immunologic effects. Ann. Allergy 66, 441-452 (1991)
11 Frenzilli, G., Bosco, E. & Barale, R. Validation of single cell gel assay in human leukocytes with 18 reference compounds. Mutat. Res. 468, 93-108 (2000)   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Kim, Y.J., Kwak, C.I., Gu, Y.Y., Hwang, I.T. & Chun, J.Y. Annealing control primer system for identification of differentially expressed genes on agarose gels. Biotechniques 36, 424-426, 428, 430 (2004)
13 Singh, N.P., Stephens, R.E. & Schneider, E.L. Modifications of alkaline microgel electrophoresis for sensitive detection of DNA damage. Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 66, 23-28 (1994)   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Ma, T.H. & Harris, M.M. Review of the genotoxicity of formaldehyde. Mutat. Res. 196, 37-59 (1988)   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Swenberg, J.A. et al. Non-linear biological responses to formaldehyde and their implications for carcinogenic risk assessment. Carcinogenesis 4, 945-952 (1983)   DOI   ScienceOn
16 IARC. Formaldehyde. In: IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans, wood dust and formaldehyde, Vol. 62, 217-362 (1995)
17 Tice, R.R. et al. Single cell gel/comet assay: guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 35, 206-221 (2000)   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Zeng, F. & Schultz, R.M. Gene expression in mouse oocytes and preimplantation embryos: Use of suppression subtractive hybridization to identify oocyte- and embryo-specific genes. Bio. Reprod. 68, 31-39 (2003)   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Quievryn, G. & Zhitkovich, A. Loss of DNA-protein crosslinks from formaldehyde-exposed cells occurs through spontaneous hydrolysis and an active repair process linked to proteosome function. Carcinogenesis 21, 1573-1580 (2000)   DOI
20 Conolly, R.B. et al. Biologically motivated computational modeling of formaldehyde carcinogenicity in the F344 rat. Toxicol. Sci. 75, 432-447 (2003)   DOI
21 Mohan, M., Ryder, S., Claypool, P.L., Geisert, R.D. & Malayer, J.R. Analysis of gene expression in the bovine blastocyst produced in vitro using suppression- subtractive hybridization. Biol. Reprod. 67, 447- 453 (2002)   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Morgan, K.T., Gross, E.A. & Patterson, D.L. Distribution, progression, and recovery of acute formaldehyde- induced inhibition of nasal mucociliary function in F-344 rats. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 86, 448-456 (1986a).   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Merk, O. & Speit, G. Significance of formaldehydeinduced DNA-protein crosslinks for mutagenesis. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 32, 260-268 (1998)   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Wantke, F., Demmer, C.M., Tappler, P., Gotz, M. & Jarisch, R. Exposure to gaseous formaldehyde induces IgE-mediated sensitization to formaldehyde in schoolchildren. Clin. Exp. Allergy 26, 276-280 (1996)   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Weisel, C.P. Assessing exposure to air toxics relative to asthma. Environ. Health Perspect. 110, 527-537 (2002)   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Speit, G. & Merk, O. Evaluation of mutagenic effects of formaldehyde in vitro: detection of crosslinks and mutations in mouse lymphoma cells. Mutagenesis 17, 183-187 (2002)   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Hodgson, M. Indoor environmental exposures and symptoms. Environ. Health Perspect. 110, 663-667 (2002)   DOI
28 Conaway, C.C., Whysner, J., Verna, L.K. & Williams, G.M. Formaldehyde mechanistic data and risk assessment: endogenous protection from DNA adduct formation. Pharmacol. Ther. 71, 29-55 (1996)   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Ryu, J.C., Kim, H.J., Seo, Y.R. & Kim, K.R. Single Cell Gel Electrophoresis (Comet Assay) to detect DNA damage and Apoptosis in cell level. Environ. Mutagen & Carcinogen. 17, 71-77 (1997)   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Sakamoto, T., Doi, S. & Torii, S. Effects of formaldehyde, as an indoor pollutant, on the airway. Allergol. Int. 48, 151- 160 (1999)   DOI
31 Morgan, K. & Monticello, T.M. Formaldehyde toxicity: respiratory epithelial injury and repair. In Biology, Toxicology, and Carcinogenesis of Respiratory Epithelium. (ed. D. a. N. Thomaseen, P), pp. 155-171, Hemisphere, New York (1990)
32 Grammer, L.C., Harris, K.E. & Shaughnessy, M.A. Clinical and immunologic evaluation of 37 workers exposed to gaseous formaldehyde. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 86, 177-181 (1990)   DOI
33 Morgan, K.T., Jiang, X.Z., Starr, T.B. & Kerns, W.D. More precise localization of nasal tumors associated with chronic exposure of F-344 rats to formaldehyde gas. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 82, 264-71 (1986b)   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Hendrick, D.J. & Lane, D.J. Occupational formalin asthma. Br. J. Ind. Med. 34, 11-18 (1977)
35 Kim, C.W. et al. Occupational asthma due to formaldehyde. Yonsei Med. J. 42, 440-445 (2001)   DOI
36 Singh, N.P., McCoy, M.T., Tice, R.R. & Schneider, E.L. A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp. Cell Res. 175, 184-191 (1988)   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Kerns, W.D., Pavkov, K.L., Donofrio, D.J., Gralla, E.J. & Swenberg, J.A. Carcinogenicity of formaldehyde in rats and mice after long-term inhalation exposure. Cancer Res. 43, 4382-4392 (1983)
38 Monticello, T.M. et al. Correlation of regional and nonlinear formaldehyde-induced nasal cancer with proliferating populations of cells. Cancer Res. 56, 1012-1022 (1996)
39 Salkie, M.L. The prevalence of atopy and hypersensitivity to formaldehyde in pathologists. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 115, 614-616 (1991)