Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2017.47.1.51

A comparison of different compressive forces on graft materials during alveolar ridge preservation  

Cho, In-Woo (Department of Periodontology, Dankook University College of Dentistry)
Park, Jung-Chul (Department of Periodontology, Dankook University College of Dentistry)
Shin, Hyun-Seung (Department of Periodontology, Dankook University College of Dentistry)
Publication Information
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science / v.47, no.1, 2017 , pp. 51-63 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: Following tooth extraction, alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) can maintain the dimensions of ridge height and width. Although previous studies have demonstrated the effects of ARP, few if any studies have investigated the compressive force applied during grafting. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of different compressive forces on the graft materials during ARP. Methods: After tooth extraction, sockets were filled with deproteinized bovine bone mineral with 10% porcine collagen and covered by a resorbable collagen membrane in a double-layered fashion. The graft materials were compressed using a force of 5 N in the test group (n=12) and a force of 30 N in the control group (n=12). A hidden X suture was performed to secure the graft without primary closure. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed immediately after grafting and 4 months later, just before implant surgery. Tissue samples were retrieved using a trephine bur from the grafted sites during implant surgery for histologic and histomorphometric evaluations. Periotest values (PTVs) were measured to assess the initial stability of the dental implants. Results: Four patients dropped out from the control group and 20 patients finished the study. Both groups healed without any complications. The CBCT measurements showed that the ridge volume was comparably preserved vertically and horizontally in both groups (P>0.05). Histomorphometric analysis demonstrated that the ratio of new bone formation was significantly greater in the test group (P<0.05). The PTVs showed no significant differences between the 2 groups (P>0.05). Conclusions: The application of a greater compressive force on biomaterials during ARP significantly enhanced new bone formation while preserving the horizontal and vertical dimensions of the alveolar ridge. Further studies are required to identity the optimal compressive force for ARP.
Keywords
Alveolar bone grafting; Alveolar ridge augmentation; Histology; Tooth extraction;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:212-8.   DOI
2 Cardaropoli G, Araujo M, Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2003;30:809-18.   DOI
3 Devlin H, Sloan P. Early bone healing events in the human extraction socket. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;31:641-5.   DOI
4 Trombelli L, Farina R, Marzola A, Bozzi L, Liljenberg B, Lindhe J. Modeling and remodeling of human extraction sockets. J Clin Periodontol 2008;35:630-9.   DOI
5 Ten Heggeler JM, Slot DE, Van der Weijden GA. Effect of socket preservation therapies following tooth extraction in non-molar regions in humans: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:779-88.   DOI
6 Buser D, Dahlin C, Schenk RK. Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry. Chicago (IL): Quintessence; 1994.
7 Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Coulthard P, Worthington HV. The efficacy of various bone augmentation procedures for dental implants: a Cochrane systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:696-710.
8 Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Polyzos IP, Felice P, Worthington HV. Timing of implant placement after tooth extraction: immediate, immediate-delayed or delayed implants? A Cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol 2010;3:189-205.
9 Nyman S, Lang NP, Buser D, Bragger U. Bone regeneration adjacent to titanium dental implants using guided tissue regeneration: a report of two cases. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:9-14.
10 Mayfield L. Immediate, delayed and late submerged and transmucosal implants. Proceedings of the 3rd European Workshop on Periodontology: Implant Dentistry; 1999 Jan 30-Feb 3; Thurgau, Switzerland. Berlin: Quintessenz; 1999.
11 Evans CD, Chen ST. Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:73-80.
12 Waasdorp JA, Evian CI, Mandracchia M. Immediate placement of implants into infected sites: a systematic review of the literature. J Periodontol 2010;81:801-8.   DOI
13 Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Ridge preservation with the use of Bio-Oss collagen: a 6-month study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:433-40.   DOI
14 Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Gaveglio L, Cardaropoli G. Socket preservation using bovine bone mineral and collagen membrane: a randomized controlled clinical trial with histologic analysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2012;32:421-30.
15 Vignoletti F, Matesanz P, Rodrigo D, Figuero E, Martin C, Sanz M. Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23 Suppl 5:22-38.
16 Avila-Ortiz G, Elangovan S, Kramer KW, Blanchette D, Dawson DV. Effect of alveolar ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2014;93:950-8.   DOI
17 Delgado-Ruiz R, Romanos GE, Alexandre Gerhke S, Gomez-Moreno G, Mate-Sanchez de Val JE, Calvo-Guirado JL. Biological effects of compressive forces exerted on particulate bone grafts during socket preservation: animal study. Clin Oral Implants Res. Forthcoming 2016.
18 Mardas N, Trullenque-Eriksson A, MacBeth N, Petrie A, Donos N. Does ridge preservation following tooth extraction improve implant treatment outcomes: a systematic review: Group 4: therapeutic concepts & methods. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26 Suppl 11:180-201.
19 Romanos GE, Delgado-Ruiz RA, Gomez-Moreno G, Lopez-Lopez PJ, Mate Sanchez de Val JE, Calvo-Guirado JL. Role of mechanical compression on bone regeneration around a particulate bone graft material: an experimental study in rabbit calvaria. Clin Oral Implants Res. Forthcoming 2015.
20 Krauser JT, Schetritt A. Implant site development: socket preservation. In: Sonick M, Hwang D, editors. Implant site development. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012. p.121-35.
21 Park JC, Koo KT, Lim HC. The hidden X suture: a technical note on a novel suture technique for alveolar ridge preservation. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2016;46:415-25.   DOI
22 Kim SH, Kim DY, Kim KH, Ku Y, Rhyu IC, Lee YM. The efficacy of a double-layer collagen membrane technique for overlaying block grafts in a rabbit calvarium model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1124-32.   DOI
23 Kozlovsky A, Aboodi G, Moses O, Tal H, Artzi Z, Weinreb M, et al. Bio-degradation of a resorbable collagen membrane (Bio-$Gide^{(R)}$) applied in a double-layer technique in rats. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1116-23.   DOI
24 Kim DM, De Angelis N, Camelo M, Nevins ML, Schupbach P, Nevins M. Ridge preservation with and without primary wound closure: a case series. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2013;33:71-8.   DOI
25 Jung RE, Philipp A, Annen BM, Signorelli L, Thoma DS, Hammerle CH, et al. Radiographic evaluation of different techniques for ridge preservation after tooth extraction: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2013;40:90-8.   DOI
26 Lindhe J, Cecchinato D, Donati M, Tomasi C, Liljenberg B. Ridge preservation with the use of deproteinized bovine bone mineral. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:786-90.   DOI
27 Engler-Hamm D, Cheung WS, Yen A, Stark PC, Griffin T. Ridge preservation using a composite bone graft and a bioabsorbable membrane with and without primary wound closure: a comparative clinical trial. J Periodontol 2011;82:377-87.   DOI
28 Yildirim M, Spiekermann H, Biesterfeld S, Edelhoff D. Maxillary sinus augmentation using xenogenic bone substitute material Bio-Oss in combination with venous blood. A histologic and histomorphometric study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:217-29.   DOI
29 McKenzie JA, Silva MJ. Comparing histological, vascular and molecular responses associated with woven and lamellar bone formation induced by mechanical loading in the rat ulna. Bone 2011;48:250-8.   DOI
30 Carmagnola D, Adriaens P, Berglundh T. Healing of human extraction sockets filled with Bio-Oss. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:137-43.   DOI
31 Zitzmann NU, Scharer P, Marinello CP, Schupbach P, Berglundh T. Alveolar ridge augmentation with Bio-Oss: a histologic study in humans. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2001;21:288-95.
32 Lotke PA, Carolan GF, Puri N. Technique for impaction bone grafting of large bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006;21:57-60.   DOI
33 Araujo M, Linder E, Wennstrom J, Lindhe J. The influence of Bio-Oss Collagen on healing of an extraction socket: an experimental study in the dog. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:123-35.
34 Park JY, Koo KT, Kim TI, Seol YJ, Lee YM, Ku Y, et al. Socket preservation using deproteinized horse-derived bone mineral. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2010;40:227-31.   DOI
35 Sennerby L, Meredith N. Implant stability measurements using resonance frequency analysis: biological and biomechanical aspects and clinical implications. Periodontol 2000 2008;47:51-66.   DOI