Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2017.47.1.30

Comparisons of the diagnostic accuracies of optical coherence tomography, micro-computed tomography, and histology in periodontal disease: an ex vivo study  

Park, Jin-Young (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Chung, Jung-Ho (Intelligence R&D Laboratory, LG Electronics)
Lee, Jung-Seok (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Kim, Hee-Jin (Division of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Department of Oral Biology, Human Identification Research Center, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Jung, Ui-Won (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Publication Information
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science / v.47, no.1, 2017 , pp. 30-40 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a noninvasive diagnostic technique that may be useful for both qualitative and quantitative analyses of the periodontium. Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) is another noninvasive imaging technique capable of providing submicron spatial resolution. The purpose of this study was to present periodontal images obtained using ex vivo dental OCT and to compare OCT images with micro-CT images and histologic sections. Methods: Images of ex vivo canine periodontal structures were obtained using OCT. Biologic depth measurements made using OCT were compared to measurements made on histologic sections prepared from the same sites. Visual comparisons were made among OCT, micro-CT, and histologic sections to evaluate whether anatomical details were accurately revealed by OCT. Results: The periodontal tissue contour, gingival sulcus, and the presence of supragingival and subgingival calculus could be visualized using OCT. OCT was able to depict the surface topography of the dentogingival complex with higher resolution than micro-CT, but the imaging depth was typically limited to 1.2-1.5 mm. Biologic depth measurements made using OCT were a mean of 0.51 mm shallower than the histologic measurements. Conclusions: Dental OCT as used in this study was able to generate high-resolution, cross-sectional images of the superficial portions of periodontal structures. Improvements in imaging depth and the development of an intraoral sensor are likely to make OCT a useful technique for periodontal applications.
Keywords
Diagnosis; Histology; Optical coherence tomography; Periodontal diseases;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Brown LJ, Loe H. Prevalence, extent, severity and progression of periodontal disease. Periodontol 2000 1993;2:57-71.   DOI
2 Petersen PE. The World Oral Health Report 2003: continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century--the approach of the WHO Global Oral Health Programme. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003;31 Suppl 1:3-23.   DOI
3 Burt BResearch, Science and Therapy Committee of the American Academy of Periodontology. Position paper: epidemiology of periodontal diseases. J Periodontol 2005;76:1406-19.   DOI
4 Petersen PE, Ogawa H. The global burden of periodontal disease: towards integration with chronic disease prevention and control. Periodontol 2000 2012;60:15-39.   DOI
5 Armitage GCResearch, Science and Therapy Committee of the American Academy of Periodontology. Diagnosis of periodontal diseases. J Periodontol 2003;74:1237-47.   DOI
6 Pihlstrom BL. Measurement of attachment level in clinical trials: probing methods. J Periodontol 1992;63:1072-7.   DOI
7 Mayfield L, Bratthall G, Attstrom R. Periodontal probe precision using 4 different periodontal probes. J Clin Periodontol 1996;23:76-82.   DOI
8 Molander B, Ahlqwist M, Grondahl HG, Hollender L. Comparison of panoramic and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of caries and periapical pathology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1993;22:28-32.   DOI
9 Croucher PI, Garrahan NJ, Compston JE. Assessment of cancellous bone structure: comparison of strut analysis, trabecular bone pattern factor, and marrow space star volume. J Bone Miner Res 1996;11:955-61.
10 Jeffcoat MK, Wang IC, Reddy MS. Radiographic diagnosis in periodontics. Periodontol 2000 1995;7:54-68.   DOI
11 Otis LL, Colston BW Jr, Everett MJ, Nathel H. Dental optical coherence tomography: a comparison of two in vitro systems. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000;29:85-9.   DOI
12 Mota CC, Fernandes LO, Cimoes R, Gomes AS. Non-invasive periodontal probing through fourier-domain optical coherence tomography. J Periodontol 2015;86:1087-94.   DOI
13 Fried D, Glena RE, Featherstone JD, Seka W. Nature of light scattering in dental enamel and dentin at visible and near-infrared wavelengths. Appl Opt 1995;34:1278-85.   DOI
14 Feldchtein F, Gelikonov V, Iksanov R, Gelikonov G, Kuranov R, Sergeev A, et al. In vivo OCT imaging of hard and soft tissue of the oral cavity. Opt Express 1998;3:239-50.   DOI
15 Brezinski ME, Tearney GJ, Bouma BE, Izatt JA, Hee MR, Swanson EA, et al. Optical coherence tomography for optical biopsy. Properties and demonstration of vascular pathology. Circulation 1996;93:1206-13.   DOI