Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2011.41.2.86

Cumulative survival rate of Astra Tech implants: a retrospective analysis  

Kim, Jung-Soo (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Sohn, Joo-Yeon (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Park, Jung-Chul (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Jung, Ui-Won (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Kim, Chang-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Lee, Jae-Hoon (Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Shim, June-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Lee, Keun-Woo (Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Publication Information
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science / v.41, no.2, 2011 , pp. 86-91 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the short-term predictability and reliability of Astra Tech implants according to the demographical distribution of patients and condition of implant sites and location of implants. Methods: Among patients treated with Astra Tech implant (Astra Tech AB) in the Department of Periodontology at the Dental Hospital of Yonsei University of College of Dentisry and K Dental Clinic from May 2004 to March 2009, 195 implants in 98 patients which had been restored more than 6 months ago were reviewed in this study. Following data were reviewed from patient charts and implants success rate was examined: 1) patient type and implant location, 2) bone status at the implant site, 3) diameter and length of the placed implants, 4) presence or absence of bone augmentation and types of the augmentation. Results: The results from this study are as follows: 1) most implants were placed in the molar area, especially 1st molar area of maxilla, 2) most implants were placed at $D_2$ and $D_3$ bone type, 3) most implants were placed in areas of B and C bone quantity, 4) autogenous and alloplastic bone graft and artificial membrane were used for placement of 74 implants. Conclusions: Short-term survival rate of Astra Tech implants was 100%.
Keywords
KDental implantation; Humans; Retrospective studies; Survival rate;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 3  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Hansson S, Norton M. The relation between surface roughness and interfacial shear strength for bone-anchored implants. A mathematical model. J Biomech 1999;32:829-36.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Buser D, Brägger U, Lang NP, Nyman S. Regeneration and enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990;1:22-32.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Kemppainen P, Eskola S, Ylipaavalniemi P. A comparative prospective clinical study of two single-tooth implants: a preliminary report of 102 implants. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:382-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Palmer RM, Palmer PJ, Smith BJ. A 5-year prospective study of Astra single tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:179-82.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-70.   DOI
6 Harder S, Dimaczek B, Açil Y, Terheyden H, Freitag-Wolf S, Kern M. Molecular leakage at implant-abutment connection--in vitro investigation of tightness of internal conical implant-abutment connections against endotoxin penetration. Clin Oral Investig 2010;14:427-32.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Shin DH, Cho KS, Park KH, Moon IS. An 1 year prospective comparative study evaluating the effect of microthread on the maintenance of marginal bone level. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2003;33:349-58.   DOI
8 Yoo HS, So SS, Han DH, Cho KS, Moon IS. The comparison between 2 wide implants and 3 regular implants in mandibular posterior area. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2002;32:577-88.   DOI
9 Hong SJ, Paik JW, Kim CS, Choi SH, Lee KW, Chai JK, et al. The study of implant patient's type and implant distribution. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2002;32:539-54.   DOI
10 Norton MR. Assessment of cold welding properties of the internal conical interface of two commercially available implant systems. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:159-66.   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Palmer RM, Smith BJ, Palmer PJ, Floyd PD. A prospective study of Astra single tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:173-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Penarrocha M, Carrillo C, Boronat A, Martí E. Early loading of 642 Defcon implants: 1-year follow-up. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:2317-20.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Lee DW, Choi YS, Park KH, Kim CS, Moon IS. Effect of microthread on the maintenance of marginal bone level: a 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:465-70.   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Davarpanah M, Martinez H, Etienne D, Zabalegui I, Mattout P, Chiche F, et al. A prospective multicenter evaluation of 1,583 3i implants: 1- to 5-year data. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:820-8.
15 Cochran DL. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces. J Periodontol 1999;70:1523-39.   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Li DH, Liu BL, Zou JC, Xu KW. Improvement of osseointegration of titanium dental implants by a modified sandblasting surface treatment: an in vivo interfacial biomechanics study. Implant Dent 1999;8:289-94.   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Persson LG, Lindhe J. Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:448-55.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Rosenlicht JL. SwissPlus Implant System, part 1: surgical aspects and intersystem comparisons. Implant Dent 2002;11:144-53.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Finne K, Rompen E, Toljanic J. Clinical evaluation of a prospective multicenter study on 1-piece implants. part 1: marginal bone level evaluation after 1 year of follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:226-34.
20 van Steenberghe D, De Mars G, Quirynen M, Jacobs R, Naert I. A prospective split-mouth comparative study of two screw-shaped self-tapping pure titanium implant systems. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:202-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Schliephake H, Neukam FW, Wichmann M. Survival analysis of endosseous implants in bone grafts used for the treatment of severe alveolar ridge atrophy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55:1227-33.   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Misch CE, Misch-Dietsh F, Silc J, Barboza E, Cianciola LJ, Kazor C. Posterior implant single-tooth replacement and status of adjacent teeth during a 10-year period: a retrospective report. J Periodontol 2008;79:2378-82.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Becktor JP, Isaksson S, Sennerby L. Survival analysis of endosseous implants in grafted and nongrafted edentulous maxillae. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:107-15.
24 Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990;1:33-40.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
26 Carr AB, Choi YG, Eckert SE, Desjardins RP. Retrospective cohort study of the clinical performance of 1-stage dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:399-405.
27 Lekholm U, Grondahl K, Jemt T. Outcome of oral implant treatment in partially edentulous jaws followed 20 years in clinical function. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006;8:178-86.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Collaert B, De Bruyn H. Comparison of Branemark fixture integration and short-term survival using one-stage or two-stage surgery in completely and partially edentulous mandibles. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9:131-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Schnitman PA, Shulman LB. Recommendations of the consensus development conference on dental implants. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;98:373-7.   DOI
30 Smith DE, Zarb GA. Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:567-72.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Smith DC. Future directions for research on materials and design of dental implants. J Dent Educ 1988;52:815-20.
32 Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, Weingart D, Taylor TM, Bernard JP, et al. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:144-53.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Atwood DA. Postextraction changes in the adult mandible as illustrated by microradiographs of midsagittal sections and serial cephalometric roentgenograms. J Prosthet Dent 1963;13:810-24.   DOI
34 Branemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago; Quintensence 1985: p.199-209.
35 Chiarenza AR. Retrospective observations on the influence of bone type in determining the nature of bone implant interface. Int J Oral Implantol 1989;6:43-8.
36 Tatum OH Jr, Lebowitz MS. Anatomic considerations for dental implants. J Oral Implantol 1991;17:16-21.
37 Martinez H, Davarpanah M, Missika P, Celletti R, Lazzara R. Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:423-32.   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Norton MR. A short-term clinical evaluation of immediately restored maxillary TiOblast single-tooth implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:274-81.
39 Baier RE, Meenaghan MA, Hartman LC, Wirth JE, Flynn HE, Meyer AE, et al. Implant surface characteristics and tissue interaction. J Oral Implantol 1988;13:594-606.