Browse > Article

A comparative study for guided bone regeneration of silk fibroin nanomembrane(NanoGide-$S^{TM}$)  

Han, Dae-Hyun (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Dan Kook University)
Hong, Ki-Seok (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Dan Kook University)
Chung, Chin-Hyung (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Dan Kook University)
Yim, Sung-Bin (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Dan Kook University)
Publication Information
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science / v.38, no.3, 2008 , pp. 475-482 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the safety and efficiency of bone regenerative abilities of silk fibroin nanomembrane(Nanoguide-S) Material and Methods: The objects were 38 patients who had large defect at extraction sockets caused by chronic periodontitis and silk fibroin nano matrix were used on experimental group(N=19) and PLA/PLGA matrix were used on control group(N=19). The width, height, and length by crown-apical direction(socket depth) of defects were measured with the occlusal plane as a reference plane, and tooth axis direction, perpendicular to tooth axis direction were measured on radiographs at 3 months pre-operative, 3 months post-operative. Result: Tissue response to silk fibroin nano matrix and Biomesh were clinically satisfactory and complications such as swelling, exudation, ulceration and vesicles were not found except the ordinary discomfort of operated portion. 3 months later, the width, height, and length by crown-apical direction (socket depth) of defects were clinically improved in both groups with no significant difference. 3 months later radiolucency of tooth axis direction and perpendicular to tooth axis direction were all increased in both groups with no significant difference. Conclusion: By these results biodegradadable silk fibroin nano matrix was efficient in GBR on alveolar bone resorption caused by periodontitis compared to Biomesh.
Keywords
Silk fibroin nanomembrane; guided bone regeneration;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Melcher AH. On the repair potential of periodontal tissue. J Periodontol 1976;47:256-260   DOI   PUBMED
2 Gottlow J, Nyman S, Lindhe J, Karring T, Wennstrom J. New attachment formation in the human periodontium by guided tissue regeneration. Case reports. J Clin Periodontol 1986;13:604-616   DOI
3 Pontorieto R, Nyman S, Lindhe J, Rosenberg E, Sanavi F. Guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of furcation defects in man. J Clin Periodontol 1987;14:618-620   DOI
4 HurzelerMB, Quinones CR, Caffesse RG, Schupbach P, Morrison EC. Guided periodontal tissue regeneration in interproximal intrabony defects following treatment with a synthetic bioabsorbable barrier. J Periodontol 1997;68:489-497   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
5 Teparat T, Solt CW, Claman LJ, Beck FM. Clinical comparison of bioabsorbable barriers with non-resorbable barriers in guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of human intrabony defects. J Periodontol 1998;69:632-641   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
6 Nyman S, Gottlow J, Lindhe J, Karring T, Wennstrom J. New attachment formation by guided tissue regeneration. J Periodont Res 1987;22:252-254   DOI
7 Caffesse R, Smith BA, Duff B et al. Class II furcations treated by guided tissue regeneration in humans. Case reports. J Periodontol 1990;61:510-514   DOI   PUBMED
8 Cortellini P, Pini-Prato G, Tonetti MS. Periodontal regeneration of human intrabony defects with bioresorbable membranes. A controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol 1996;67:217-223   DOI   PUBMED
9 Pontoriero R, Lindhe J, Nyman S et al. Guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of furcation defects in mandibular molars. A clinical study of degree III involvements, J Clin Periodontol 1989;16:170-174   DOI
10 Jayaraman K, Kotaki M, Zhang Y, Mo X, Ramakrishna S. Recent advances in polymer nanofibers. Nanosci Nanotechnol 2004;4(1-2):52-65
11 Parodi R, Carusi G, Santarelli G et al. Guided tissue regeneration employing a collagen membrane in a human periodontal bone defect: A histologic evaluation. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1997;17:283-291
12 Caffesse RG, Mota LF, Quinones CR, Morrison EC. Clinical comparison of resorbable and nonresorbable barriers for guided periodontal tissue regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:747-752   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Gottlow J, Karring T. Maintenance of new attachment gained through guided tissue regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 1992;19:315-317   DOI
14 Quinones CR, Caton JG, Mota LF, Polson AM, Wagener CJ. Evaluation of synthetic biodegradable barriers to facilitate guided tissue regeneration. J Periodont Res 1990;69:275
15 Nyman S, Lindhe J, Karring T, Rylander H. New attachment following surgical treatment of human periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 1982;9:290-296   DOI
16 Pontoriero R, Lindhe J, Nyman S et al. Guided tissue regeneration in degree II furcation-involved mandibular molars. A clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 1988;15:247-254   DOI
17 Christgau M, Schmalz G, Wenzel A, Hiller KA. Periodontal regeneration of intrabony defects with resorbable and nonresorbable membranes: 30month results. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:17-27   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Quinones CR, Caton JG, Polson AM et al. Evaluation of synthetic biodegradable barriers to facilitate guided tissue regeneration in interproximal sites. J Periodontol 1991;62:86
19 Galgut P, Pitrola R, Waite I, Doyle C, Smith R. Histologic evaluation of biodegradable and non-degradable membrane placed transcutaneously in rats. J Clin Periodontol 1991;18: 581-586   DOI
20 Socransky SS, Haffajee AD, Goodson JM, Linde J. New concepts of destructive periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 1984;11:21-32   DOI
21 Hutmacher D, Hurzeler MB, Schliephake H. A review of material properties of biodegradable and bioresorbable polymers and devices for GTR and GBR applications. Int J Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:667-678
22 Weltman R, Trejo E, Morrison E, Caffesse R. Assessment of guided tissue regeneration procedures in intrabony defects with bioabsorbable and nonresorbable barriers. J Periodontol 1997;68:582-591   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
23 Byung Moo Min, Lim Jeong, Young Sik Nam et al. Formation of silk fibroin matrices with different texture and its cellular response to normal human keratinocytes. Biological Macromolecules 2004;34:223-230
24 Lekovic V, Kenney EB, Kovacevic K, Carranza Jr. Evaluation of guided tissue regeneration in class II furcation defects. A clinical re-entry study. J Periodontol 1989;60:694-698   DOI   PUBMED
25 Becker W, Becker B, Berg L et al. New attachment after treatment with root isolation and vertical osseous defects. Int J Periondontics Restorative Dent 1988;8:8-23
26 Wang HL, O'Neal RB, MacNeil LM. Regenerative treatment of periodontal of periodontal defect utilizing a bioresorbable collagen membrane. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 1992;4:35-41
27 Fleicher N, Waal HD, Bloom A. Regeneration of lost attachment apparatus in the dog using vicryl absorbable mesh(polyglactin910). Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1988;8:45-54
28 Eickholz P, Kim TS, Holle R. Guided tissue regeneration with nonresorbable barriers: 6 months results. J Clin Periodontol 1997;24:92-101   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Byung Moo Min, Gene Lee, So Hyun Kim et al. Electrospinning of silk fibroin nanofibers and its effect on the adhesion and spreading of normal human keratinocytes and fibroblasts in vitro. Biomaterials 2004;25(7-8):1289-1297   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Bhattarai SR, Bhattarai N, Yi HK et al. Novel biodegradable electrospun membrane: scaffold for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2004;25(13):2595-2602   DOI   ScienceOn