Browse > Article

Multilateral analysis of $Renova^{(R)}$ implant placement and its Survival rate  

Yang, Jin-Hyuk (Department of Periodontology, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Kim, Sung-Tae (Department of Periodontology, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Jung, Ui-Won (Department of Periodontology, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Nam, Woong (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Jung, Young-Soo (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Shim, June-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Moon, Hong-Seok (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Lee, Keun-Woo (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Cho, Kyoo-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science / v.38, no.3, 2008 , pp. 413-428 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: Given the predictability of dental implant procedure from the studies of successful osseointegration, implant dentistry is often the treatment of choice to replace missing teeth in edentulous patient instead of the fixed prosthesis or removable denture. The $Renova^{(R)}$ dental implant has a RBM(Resorbable Blast Media) surface, internal hex prosthetic connection and a tapered design. At this study gives the analysis of the implant and the short term survival rate of the implant. Material and Methods: In this study, a multilateral analysis was performed on the subjects undergoing placement with $Renova^{(R)}$ implant between August 2006 and February 2008 in Yonsei University dental hospital. 96 implants were placed in 56 patients and they were surveyed for cumulative survival rate. Among them 78 implants in 44 patients were surveyed for the rest analyses. Result: 1. The cumulative survival rate was 96.88% of 96 implants in 56 patients. 2. The mean marginal bone loss was 0.803mm and the marginal bone loss in augmentation group has higher value than the marginal bone loss in non augmentation group. 3. The health scale for the implants were 87% in success group, 9% in satisfactory survival group, 1% in compromised survival group, and 3% in failure group. 4. Two implants placed in poor bone posterior area by 2-stage failed during prosthetic procedure. Conclusion: $Renova^{(R)}$ dental implant showed high cumulative survival rate in installation on partial edentulous ridge and could be a predictable implant system.
Keywords
$Renova^{(R)}$ implant; Cumulative survival rate; Health scale for dental implants; predictable implant system;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 8  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Tatum OH, Jr., Lebowitz MS. Anatomic considerations for dental implants. J Oral Implantol 1991;17:16-21   PUBMED
2 Baier RE, Meyer AE. Future directions in surface preparation of dental implants. J Dent Educ 1988;52:788-791   PUBMED
3 Misch CE. The implant quality scale: a clinical assessment of the health--disease continuum. Oral Health 1998;88: 15-20, 23-15; quiz 25-16   PUBMED
4 Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, et al. Implant Success, Survival, and Failure: The International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent 2008;17:5-15   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Cochran DL. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces. J Periodontol 1999;70:1523-1539   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Friberg B, Grondahl K, Lekholm U. A new self-tapping Branemark implant: clinical and radiographic evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:80-85   PUBMED
7 Rosenquist B, Grenthe B. Immediate placement of implants into extraction sockets: implant survival. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:205-209
8 Myung WC, Lee JS, Chae GJ, et al. Retrospective study of type of patients, the distribution of implant and the survival rate of Xive¬implant. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2007;37: 523-534   과학기술학회마을   DOI
9 Hong JY, Chae GJ, Jung UW, et al. Retrospective studies of dental implant placement at each intraoral site and situation. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2007;37:805-824   과학기술학회마을   DOI
10 Carr AB, Choi YG, Eckert SE, Desjardins RP. Retrospective cohort study of the clinical performance of 1-stage dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:399-405
11 Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollow-screw implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1990;1:33-40   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In:Brånemark P-I, Zarb G.A., Albrektsson T.(eds). Tissue-integrated prostheses:Osseointegration in clinical dentistry.Chicago:. Quintensence 1985:199-209
13 Cutler SJ, Ederer F. Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival. J Chronic Dis 1958;8:699-712   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Chuang SK, Tian L, Wei LJ, Dodson TB. Kaplan-Meier analysis of dental implant survival: a strategy for estimating survival with clustered observations. J Dent Res 2001;80:2016-2020   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Zinsli B, Sagesser T, Mericske E, Mericske-Stern R. Clinical evaluation of small-diameter ITI implants: a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:92-99
16 Nasatzky E, Gultchin J, Schwartz Z. [The role of surface roughness in promoting osteointegration]. Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim 2003;20:8-19, 98   PUBMED
17 Vehemente VA, Chuang SK, Daher S, et al. Risk factors affecting dental implant survival. J Oral Implantol 2002;28: 74-81   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Friberg B, Henningsson C, Jemt T. Rehabilitation of edentulous mandibles by means of turned Branemark System implants after one-stage surgery: a 1-year retrospective study of 152 patients. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7:1-9   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25
20 Chiarenza AR. Retrospective observations on the influence of bone type in determining the nature of bone implant interface. Int J Oral Implantol 1989;6:43-48   PUBMED
21 Nam Gy, Chang BS, Uhm HS. Retrspective analysis of several implants' success rate. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2003;33:37-47   DOI
22 Gerstman BB. Epidemiology Kept Simple: An Introduction to Classic and Moern Epidemiology. New York: Wiley-Liss 1998:183-225
23 Finne K, Rompen E, Toljanic J. Clinical evaluation of a prospective multicenter study on 1-piece implants. part 1: marginal bone level evaluation after 1 year of follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:226-234
24 Schnitman PA, Shulman LB. Recommendations of the consensus development conference on dental implants. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;98:373-377   DOI   PUBMED
25 Shin YK, Han CH, Heo SJ, et al. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone level around implants with different neck designs after 1 year. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:789-794
26 Chae GJ, Chung SM, Jung UW, et al. The analysis of short term success rate and healing patterns of implantiumⓇ implant. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2006;36:408-416   과학기술학회마을   DOI
27 Park JE, Kim TG, Jung UW, et al. Long-term evaluation of IMZ implants; Success and survival rate. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2005;35:1039-1052   DOI
28 Schliephake H, Neukam FW, Wichmann M. Survival analysis of endosseous implants in bone grafts used for the treatment of severe alveolar ridge atrophy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55:1227-1233; discussion 1233-1224   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Smith DC. Future directions for research on materials and design of dental implants. J Dent Educ 1988;52:815-820   PUBMED
30 Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compendium 1994;15:152, 154-156, 158 passim; quiz 162
31 Jang IK, Jung UW, Kim CS, et al. The distribution of Xive implant patients and the type of implant site and survival rate in mandible. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2005;35:437-438   DOI
32 Park JE, Yun JH, Jung UW, et al. The distribution of implant patients and the type of implant site. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2004;34:819-836   과학기술학회마을   DOI
33 Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, et al. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3:81-100   DOI
34 Jacob RF, Carr AB. Hierarchy of research design used to categorize the "strength of evidence" in answering clinical dental questions. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:137-152   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Penarrocha M, Carrillo C, Boronat A, Marti E. Early loading of 642 Defcon implants: 1-year follow-up. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;65:2317-2320   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Chae GJ, Jung UW, Kim CS, et al. Retrspective analysis of frialit-2$^{\circledR}$ implant system placed in maxilla. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2005;35:449-460   DOI
37 Smith DE, Zarb GA. Criteria for success of osseointegrated endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:567-572   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Ko SM, Lee JK, Eckert SE, Choi YG. Retrospective multicenter cohort study of the clinical performance of 2-stage implants in South Korean populations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:785-788
39 Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Dula K, Lang NP. Clinical experience with one-stage, non-submerged dental implants. Adv Dent Res 1999;13:153-161   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Coulthard P, et al. A 5-year follow-up comparative analysis of the efficacy of various osseointegrated dental implant systems: a systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:557-568