Browse > Article

Perception of maxillary anterior esthetics by dental professionals and lay people and topographical tooth-gingiva interface  

An, Ki-Yeon (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Lee, Ju-Youn (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Kim, Sung-Jo (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Choi, Jeom-Il (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science / v.36, no.4, 2006 , pp. 817-827 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose : This study was designed 1) to compare the perception of dental professionals and lay people with respect to minor variations in maxillary anterior tooth size and alignment and their relation to the surrounding soft tissues, and 2) to evaluate the normal tooth-gingiva topographical relationships in periodontally healthy young subjects, Materials and methods : Maxillary anterior teeth were intentionally diagrammed in varying degree of deviation with respect to one of three common anterior esthetic discrepancies including variations in crown length, shape of gingival margin, and length of interproximal contact, 17 images were generated to be preferentially selected by 2 groups consisting of dental professionals and lay people (total of 740). Smiling photographs of 120 dental students who had healthy periodontium were taken and the photographic images were analyzed to be classified as 17 kinds of altered image groups. Results : The results demonstrated noticeable difference between the varying levels of discrepancy. Both group preferred gingival margin of lateral incisor to be 0.5mm lower than that of central incisor. Lay people preferred the gingival margin shape that has 2/9 horizontal component of the crown width, while dental professionals preferred the gingival margin shape that has 1/9 horizontal component of the crown width. Lay people preferred longer length of the interproximal contact (two thirds of the crown length), whereas dental professionals preferred shorter length of the interproximal contact (half of the crown length). Photographic analysis of normal esthetic gingival topography revealed 2/9 horizontal component and short length of the interproximal contact which was of the hybrid nature of the preferences shared by lay people and dental professionals. Conclusion: The results of this study show that dental professionals and lay people demonstrated significant difference in their preference of dental esthetic components, which may then influence the decision making process by dental professionals with respect to designing the anterior esthetic gingival line.
Keywords
gingival esthetic line; gingival topography; tooth alignment;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Kokich VO Jr., Kiyak HA., Shapiro PA Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. J Esthet Dent 1999;11:311-324   DOI
2 Katz RV. Relationships between eight orthodontic indices and an oral self-image satisfaction scale. Am J Orthod 1978;73: 328-334   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Ahmad I. Geometric considerations in anterior dental aesthetics restorative principles. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1998;10:813-822
4 Graber LW., Lucker LW. Dental esthetic self-evaluation and satisfaction. Am J Orthod 1980;77:163-173   DOI   ScienceOn
5 우이형. 전치부 심미적 보철에 관하여. 대한치주과학회지 1991;29:746-751
6 Kurt M.A, Rolf G.B., Thomas McKinney Tooth shape preferences in an esthetic smile. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005;128:458-465   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Chalifoux PR. Perception of esthetics : factors that affect smile design. J Esthet Dent 1996;8: 189-192   DOI
8 Kurth J., Kokich VG. Open gingival embrasures after orthodontic treatment in adults : prevalence and etiology. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;120:116-123   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Burden DJ., Pine CM. Self-perception of malocclusion among adolescents. Community Dent Health 1995:12:89-92
10 Moskowitz ME., Nayyar A. Determinants of dental esthetics : A rationale for smile analysis and treatment. Compendium Continuing Education Dentistry 1995;16: 1164-1186
11 Brisman AS. Esthetics: a comparison of dentists' and patients' concepts. J Am Dent Assoc. 1980;100:345-352   DOI
12 Flores-Mir C.,Silva E., Barriga MI., Lagravere MO., Major PW, Lay person's perception of smile aesthetics in dental and facial views. J Ortho 2004;31:204-209   DOI   ScienceOn
13 정민영, 임성빔, 정진형. 상악 전치부 치은선의 평균치에 관한 연구. 대한치주과학회지 2004; 34(1):19-28
14 Kokich VG. Esthetics : The orthodonticperiodontic restorative connection Semin Orthod 1996;2:21-30
15 LaVacca MI., Tarnow DP., Cisneros GJ. Interdental papilla length and the perception of aesthetics. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2005;17:405-412
16 Miller CJ. The smile line as a guide to anterior esthetics. Dent Clin North Am 1989;33:157-164
17 Johnston DC., Burden DJ., Stevenson MR. The influence of dental to facial midline discrepancies on dental attractiveness ratings. Eur J Orthod 1999;21:517-522   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Espeland LV. , Stenvik A. Perception of personal dental appearance in young adults : relationship between occlusion, awareness and satisfaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:234-241   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Vallittu PK., Vallitu ASJ., Lassila VP. Dental aesthetics : a survey of attitudes in different groups of patients. J Dent 1996; 24:335-338   DOI   ScienceOn