Browse > Article

Retrospective study on ITI SLA (sand-blasted, large-grit, acid-etched) implant for mandibular posterior single tooth replacement  

Lee, Seung-Mun (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Reasearch Institute for Periodontal Regeneration)
Chae, Gyung-Joon (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Reasearch Institute for Periodontal Regeneration)
Jung, Ui-Won (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Reasearch Institute for Periodontal Regeneration)
Kim, Chang-Sung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Reasearch Institute for Periodontal Regeneration)
Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Reasearch Institute for Periodontal Regeneration)
Cho, Kyoo-Sung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Reasearch Institute for Periodontal Regeneration)
Kim, Chong-Kwan (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Reasearch Institute for Periodontal Regeneration)
Chai, Jung-Kyu (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Reasearch Institute for Periodontal Regeneration)
Publication Information
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science / v.36, no.3, 2006 , pp. 661-671 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate cumulative survival rate (CSR, %) of mandibular posterior single tooth implants replaced with ITI SLA (sand-blasted, large-grit, acid-etched) implant system and compare the CSR between first and second molar. The findings from the results were as follows; 1. Total of 158 implants were inserted into 147 patients. 68 patients were males, 79 patients were females and their mean age was 47.8 years. 98 implants were placed in first molar area and 60 implants were placed in second molar area. In terms of diameter, implants with wide diameter over 4.8mm dominated (91.1%). Implants with length over lOmm were used (96.2%). 2, In the two cases, there was a slight transient numbness which recovered within 1-2 months. Nine SynOcta screw type abutments demonstrated screw loosening, There were ten cases of crown fallen-out from decementation. 3. Only one failed out of 158 implants. The CSR was 99.4%. The CSRs for first molar and second molar were 99% and 100%, respectively. From the results, it was concluded that single tooth replacement implant in the mandibular posterior area, might be considered as the effective treatment modality comparable to the conventional crown and bridge.
Keywords
Single tooth replacement; ITI SLA; cumulative survival rate; retrospective study;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ekfeldt A, Carlsson GE & Borjesson G. Clinical evaluation of single-tooth restorations supported by osseointegrated im plants: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:179-183
2 Andersson B, Odman P, Carlsson L, Branemark PI. A new Branemark single tooth abutment: handling and early clinical experiences. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7(1):105-111
3 Andersson B. Implants for single-tooth replacement. A clinical and experimental study on the Branemark CeraOne System. Review Swed Dent J Suppl, 1995;108:1-41
4 Simon RL, Single implant-supported molar and premolar crowns: A ten-year retrospective clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:517-521   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Quinlan P, Nummikoski P, Schenk R et al, Immediate and early loading of SLA ITI single-tooth implants: an in vivo study, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20(3): 360-370
6 Wennstrom JL, Ekestubbe A, Grondahl K, Karlsson S, Lindhe J. Implant-supported single-tooth restorations: a 5-year prospective study. J Clin Periodontol, 2005; 32(6):567-574   DOI   ScienceOn
7 유호선, 소성수, 한동후, 조규성, 문익상. 하악 대구치부위의 고정성 보철물에서 2 개의 장폭경과 3개의 표준 임프란트의 비교. 대한치주과학회지 2002;32:577-588
8 Jemt T, Lekholm D, Grondahl K. 3-year followup study of early single implant restorations ad modum Branemark. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1990;10:340-349
9 Fugazzotto PA, Beagle JR, Ganeles J et al, Success and failure rates of 9 mm or shorter implants in the replacement of missing maxillary molars when restored with individual crowns: preliminary results oto 84 months in function. A retrospective study. J Periodontol 2004 Feb;75(2):327-332   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Lindh T, Gunne J, Tillberg A, Molin M. A rreta-analysis of implants in partial dentulism. Clin Oral Implants Res 1998;9: 80-90   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Andersson B, Odman P, Carlsson GE. A study of 184 consecutive patients referred for single-tooth replacement. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6(4) :232-237   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Palmer RM, Smith BJ, Palmer PJ, Floyd PD. A prospective study of Astra single tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:173-179   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm D, Thomsen P, Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants, (II). Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 1998; 106:721-764   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Kregzde M. A method of selecting the best implant prosthesis design option using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:662-673
15 Becker W, Becker BE. Replacement of maxillary and mandibular molars with single endosseous implant restorations: A retrospective study. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74:51-55   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP et al, Long-term evaluation of nonsubmerged ITl implants. Part 1: 8-year life Table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-172   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Griffin TJ, Cheung WS. The use of short, wide implants in posterior areas with reduced bone height: a retrospective investigation. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:139-144   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Polizzi G, Rangert B, Lekholm D, Gualini F, Lindstrom H. Branemark system wide platform implants for single molar replacement: clinical evaluation of prospective and retrospective materials, Clin Implant Dent Relat Res, 2000;2:61-69   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Buser D, Weber HP, Br gger D & Balsiger C. Tissue integration of one-stage ITI implants: 3-year results of a longitudinal study with hollow-cylinder and hollow- screw implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6: 405-412
20 Palmer RM, Palmer PJ, Smith BJ. A 5-year prospective study of Astra single tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11: 179-182.   DOI
21 Chaushu G, Chaushu S, Tzohar A, Dayan D, Immediate loading of single-tooth implants: Immediate versus nonimmediate implantation, A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:267-272
22 Schroeder A, Pohler O, Sutter F. Gewebsreaktion auf ein Titan-Hohlzylinderimplantat mit Titan-Spritzschichtoberflachs. Schweizer Monatsschrift fur Zahnheilkunde 1976;86: 713-727.
23 Schwartz-Arad D, Samet N, Samet N. Single tooth replacement of missing molars: a retrospective study of 78 implants, J Periodontol, 1999;70:449-454   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Laney WR, Jemt T, Harris D et al, Osseointegrated implants for single-tooth replacement: progress report from a multicenter prospective study after 3 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:49-54
25 Wyatt CC, Zarb GA, Treatment outcomes of patients with implant-supported fixed partial prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:204-211
26 Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R et al Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg suppl, 1977;16:1-132
27 Jemt T. Modified single and short-span restorations supported by osseointegrated fixtures in the partially edentulous jaw. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:243-247   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Lekholm D, Zarb GA, Br nemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue-integrated prostheses. Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago. Quintessence 1985:199-209
29 이항빈, 백정원, 김창성 등. 하악 제 1, 2 대구치를 대체하는 단일 임프란트 간의 성공률 비교. 대한치주과학회지 2004;34:101-111
30 Cooper L, Felton DA, Kugelberg CF, et al, A multicenter 12 month evaluation of single- tooth implants restored 3 weeks after 1-rstage surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001:16:182-192
31 Henry PJ, Laney WR, Jemt T et al, Osseointegrated implants for single-tooth replacement: a prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:450-455
32 Haas R, Mensdorff-Pouilly N, Mailath G, Watzek G. Branemark single tooth implants: a preliminary report of 76 implants. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:274-9   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Petropoulos VC, Wolfinger GJ, Balshi TJ. Complications of mandibular molar replacement with a single implant: a case report. J Can Dent Assoc. 2004;70:238-242
34 Ivanoff CJ, Grondahl K, Sennerby L, Bergstrom C, Lekholm U. Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 670 5-year retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:173-180
35 Gibbard LL, Zarb G. A 5-year prospective study of implant-supported single-tooth replacements. J Can Dent Assoc 2002;68: 110-6
36 Schmitt A & Zarb G.A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants for single-tooth replacement. Int J Prosth 1993;6:197-202
37 Fartash B, Arvidson K. Long-term evaluation of single crystal sapphire implants as abutments in fixed prosthodontics. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:58-67   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Brugenakte C et al, The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13: 144-153   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Friberg B, Ekestubbe A, Sennerby L. Clinical outcome of Branemark System Implants of various diameters: a retro-spective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:671-7
40 Scheller H, Urgell JP, Kultje C et al, A 5-year multicenter study on implant- supported single crown restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:212-218
41 Avivi-Arber L, Zarb GA, Clinical effectiveness of implant-supported single-tooth replacement: the Toronto Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:311-21