Browse > Article

Retrospective Study of Success Rate of the $XiVE^{(R)}$ Implant;Early evaluation of clinical performance  

Park, Jin-Woo (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science / v.35, no.1, 2005 , pp. 65-76 More about this Journal
Abstract
This retrospective study evaluates the clinical performance of the recently introduced $XiVE^{(R)}$ implant(Dentsply-Friadent) with a new macro-design to improve primary stability. A total of 208 $XiVE^{(R)}$ implants (101 in the maxilla and 107 in the mandible) were placed in 71 patients. The average age of the patients was 49 years. Of the 208 implants, 190 (91.3%) were posterior implants and 82 (39.4%) were placed in compromised sites (grafted sites). Clinical and radiographic evaluation were made at second stage surgery for exposure and after functional loading. 192 implants in 64 patients were evaluated at exposure and 146 implants in 50 patients were loaded (average 170 days-loading) and evaluated after functional loading. Of 192 implants available for evaluation before loading, 3 implants failed (early failure) ; 1 before exposure, 1 at exposure and 1 during prosthetic procedure. 2 implants were in the maxilla and 1 was in the mandible. The success rate before loading was 98.4%. After functional loading, no implant failure was occurred in 146 implants evaluated during this period (100% interval success rate). This preliminary data with a new implant showed excellent success rate although the majority of implants evaluated in this study were placed in the posterior region of the jaw and compromised sites.
Keywords
$XiVE^{(R)}$ implant; success rate; primary stability; retrospective study;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Henry PJ, Laney WR, Jemt T, et al, Osseointegrated implantsfor single-tooth replacement : A prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:450-455   PUBMED
2 Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL & Buser D. Bone response to loaded and unloaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface, a histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40: 1-11   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Buchs AU, Hahn J, Vassos DM. Interim clinical study report: A threaded, hydroxyapatite-coated implant-five-year post-restoration safety and efficacy. Oral Implantol 1995;21:266-274   PUBMED
4 Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture desing and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Branemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:104-111   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM, et al, The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched(SLA) surface. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:144-153   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone and fixture success in the Branemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:104-111   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Zarb GA. A prosthodontist's perception of osseointegration. In: Worthington P, Branemark P-I(eds). Adavanced Osseointegration Surgery. Application in the maxillofacial region : Quintessence 1992:13
8 Echert SE, Meraw SJ, Weaver AL, Lohse CM. Early experience with Wide-platform MK II implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:208-216   PUBMED
9 Cavicchia F, Bravi F & Petrelli G. Localized augmentation of the maxillary sinus floor through a coronal approach for the placement of implants. Int J Perio Rest Dentistry 2001;5:475-485
10 Branemark P-I, Adell R, Breine D, et al, Intraosseous anchorage of dental prosthesis. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3:81-100   DOI
11 Schwartz Z, Martin JY, Dean DD, et al, Effect of titanium surface roughness on chondrocyte proliferation, matrix production and differentiation depends upon the state of cell maturation J Biomed Mater Res 1996;30:145-155   DOI   ScienceOn
12 DeLeonardis D, Garg AK, Pecora GE. Osseointegration of rough acid-etched titanium implants : 5-year follow-up of 100 minimatic implants Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;14:384-391
13 Jemt T. Failure and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Branemark implants in edentulous jaws. A study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual check-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:270-276   PUBMED
14 Martinez H, Davarpanah M, Missika P, Celletti R & Lazzara R. Optimal implant stabilization in low density bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:423-432   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Rosenquist JB, Grenthe B. Immediate placement of implants into extraction sockets : Implant survival. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 1996;11:205-209
16 Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1:11-25   PUBMED
17 Callen DP, Hahn J, Hebel K, et al, Retospective multicenter study of an anodized, tapered, diminishing thread implant : success rate at exposure. Implant Dent 2000;9:329-336   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Gorman LM, Lambert PM, Morris HF, Ochi S, Winkler S. The effect of smoking on implant survival at second-stage surgery : DICRG Interim Report No.5 Dental Implant Clinical Research Group. Implant Dent 1994;3:165-168
19 Sennerby L, Thomsen P & Ericson L. A morphometric and biomechanic comparison of titanium implants inserted in rabbit cortical and cancellous bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:62-71   PUBMED
20 Ivanoff CJ, Sennerby L & Lekholm U. Influence of initial implant mobility on the integration of titanium implants. An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:120-127   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Friberg B, Nilson H, Olsson M & Palmquist C. MK II : the self-tapping Branemark implant. 5year result of a prospective 3-center study. Clin Oral Implant Res 1997;8:279-285   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Toffler M. Osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation : a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:266-273
23 Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants : The Toronto study. Part I : Surgical results. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:451-457   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: The osteotome technique. Compen Contin Educ Dent 1994;15:152-160
25 Ivanoff C-J, Grondahl K, Bergstrom C, Lekholm U & Branemark P-I. Influence of bicortical or monocortical anchorage on maxillary implant stability. A 15-year retrospectiv study of Branemark system implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:103-110
26 Lambert PM, Morris HF, Ochi S. The influence of smoking on 3-year clinical success of osseointe-grated dental implants Ann Periodontol 2000;5:79-89   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Sullivan DY, Sherwood RL, Collins TA & Krogh PH. The reverse-torque test : a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:179-185   PUBMED
28 Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U. Thomsen p. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants, (I) Success criteria and epidemiology. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:527-551   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm D, Branemark P-I & Jemt T. A long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the totally edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:347-359   PUBMED
30 Truhlar RS, Orenstein IH, Monis HF & Ochi S. Distribution of bone quality in patients receiving endosseous dental implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;55(Suppl. 5):38-45
31 Deporter DA, Todescan R, Watson PA, et al, Use of the endopore dental implant to restore single teeth in the maxilla : protocol and early results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:263-272   PUBMED
32 Cochran DL. A comparision of endosseous dental implant surfaces: state of the art review. J Periodontol 1999;70:1523-1539   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
33 Branemark P-I. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Deporter D, Todescan R, Caudry S. Simplifying management of the posterior maxilla using short, porous-surfaced dental implants and simultaneous indirect sinus elevation. Int J Periodontics Reconstrutive Dent 2000;20:476-485
35 Davarpanah M, Martinez H, Celletti R, et al. Osseotite implant : 3-year prospective multicenter evaluation. Clin Impl Dent & Relat Res 2001;3:111-118   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone : A 5 year analysis. J Periodontol 1991;62:2-4   DOI   PUBMED