Browse > Article

Clinical, histologic, and histometric evaluation of implants with microthreaded crest module and SLA surface  

Moon, Sang-Kwon (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Pang, Eun-Kyoung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Kim, Chang-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Cho, Kyoo-Sung (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University)
Chai, Jung-Kiu (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Kim, Chong-Kwan (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University)
Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Brain Korea 21 Project for Medical Science, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science / v.34, no.1, 2004 , pp. 127-138 More about this Journal
Abstract
Background: Crestal bone loss known as saucerization is a frequently observed phenomenon. Recent studies have shown that implants with micothreaded crest module reduced the force concentration in the crestal region thus resulting in no or reduced crestal bone loss. This study presents a clinical, histologic, and histometric evaluation of implants with microthreaded crest module and SLA surface. Methods: The implants were placed in the mandible of 5 beagle dogs weighing 10-15kg. Four premolars were bilaterally extracted 8 weeks prior to implant placement. Mucoperiosteal flap was elevated and drilling with increasing diameter was performed under saline irrigation. After countersinking 2 implants were placed in each side resulting in 4 implants per dog. Healing period of 8 weeks was allowed before sacrificing the animals. Histologic preparation was performed for histologic and histometric analysis. Bone to implant contact as well as percentage of bone area inside threads were measured. T-test was used for statistical analysis with pvalue p<0.05. Results: 1. Healing was uneventful without any cover screw exposure. New bone formation around the implants was observed without any inflammatory infiltration. 2. Bone to implant contact in the microthread and thread were 43.90 ${\pm}$ 20.30 %, and 53.19 ${\pm}$ 20.97 % respectively. The overall bone to implant contact was 48.54 ${\pm}$ 20.95 %. 3. Percentage of bone area inside threads were 54.43 ${\pm}$ 10.39 %, and 38.44 ${\pm}$ 16.44 % for the microthread and thread respectively. There was statistically significant difference(p<0.05). The overall percentage of bone area inside threads was 46.67 ${\pm}$ 15.68 %.
Keywords
Bone to implant contact; Percentage of bone area inside threads; Microthread; Crest module; SLA surface.;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark P-I. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 10(6): 387-416, 1981
2 Henry PJ, Tolman DE, Bolender CH. The Applicability of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: Three years of a prospective multicenter study. Quintessence Int. 24: 123-129, 1993
3 Cochran DL, Simpson J, Weber H-P, Buser D. Attachment and growth of periodental cells on smooth and rough titanium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 9: 289-297, 1994
4 Buser D, Weber HP, Lang NP. Tissue integration of non-submerged implants. 1-year results of a prospective study with 100 ITI hollow-cylinder and hollw-screw implants. Clin Oral Implant Res 1: 33-40, 1990
5 Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm V. Eary failures in 4,641 consecutively placed Branemark dental implants. A study from stage I surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implnats 6: 142-146, 1991
6 Paolo Trisi, Richard Lazzara, Alberto rebaudi, Walter Rao, Tiziano testori, Stephan S. Porter. Bone-implnat contact on machined and dual acid-etched surfaces after 2months of healing in the human maxilla. J Periodontol 74: 945-56, 2003
7 Hansson S. A conical implant-abutment interface at the level of the marginal bone improves the distribution of stress in the supporting bone. Clin Oral Implant Res 14: 286-293, 2003
8 Adell R, Ericksson B, Lekholm U, Branemark P-I. A long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 5: 347-359, 1990
9 Branemark P-I, Svensson B, van Steenberghe D. Ten-year survival rates of fixed prostheses on four or six implants ad modum $Br{\"{a}}nemark$ in full edentulism. Clin Oral Impl Res 6: 227-231, 1995
10 Albreksson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1: 11-25, 1986
11 Paul PB. Implants and components: entering the new millenium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15: 76-94, 2000
12 Persson LG, Araujo M, Berglundh T, Grondahl K, Lindhe J. Resolution of periimplantitis following treatment. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implant Res 10: 151-203,1999
13 Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, et al, Marginal tissue reactions at osseointegrated titanium fixtures. (I) A 3-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 15: 39-52,1986
14 Guo EX. Mechanical properties of cortical bone and cancellous bone tissue. In: Cowin SC, ed Bone Mechanics Handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press 10/1-23, 2001
15 Persson LG, Berglundh T, Sennerby L, Lindhe J. Re-osseointegration after treatment of peri-implantitis at different implant surfaces. Clin Oral Implant Res 12: 595-603, 2001
16 Wetzel AC, Vlassis J, Hammerle CHF, Lang NP. Attempts to obtain re-osseointegration following experimental peri-implantitis in dogs. Clin Oral Implant Res 10: 111-119, 1999
17 Albrektsson T, Johansson C. Quantified bone tissue reactions to various metallic materials with reference to the so-called osseointegration concept. In: Davies JE, ed. The Bone-biomaterial Interface. Toronto: University of Toronto Press 357-363, 1991
18 Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 25: 889-902, 1991
19 Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP, Cochran DL, Nolte LP. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13: 611-619, 1998
20 Oh TJ, Yoon JK, Misch CE, Wang HL. The causes of early implant bone loss: Myth or science? J Periodontol 73: 322-333, 2002
21 Khang W, Hawley CW, Feldman S, Gunsolly JC. Preliminary results of a dual center study evaluating rough surface and smooth surface implant [abstract]. J Periodontol 71: 1202-1203, 2000.
22 Jemt T, Lekholm U, Grondahl K. A 3-year follow up study of early single implant restoration ad modum <$Br{\"{a}}nemark$. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 10: 341-349, 1990
23 Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to unloadeed and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 40: 1-11, 1998
24 Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: A 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 62: 2-4, 1991
25 Smith D, Zarb G. Criteria for success of osseointegrated endossous implants. J Prosthet Dent 62: 567-572, 1989
26 Ganeles J. Early loading with the ITI SLA surface as a predictable, routine procedure. J Indiana Dent Assoc 3: 15-16, 2002
27 Martin JY, Schwartz TW, Hummert DM, Schraub J, Boyan BD. Effect of titanium surface roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein systhesis of human osteoblast-like cells. J Biomed Mater Res 29: 389-401, 1995
28 Binon PP. Implants and components: Entering the new millennium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15: 76-94, 2000
29 Piatelli A, Manzon L, Scarano A, Paolantonio M, Piatelli M. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis of the bone response to machined and sandblasted titanium implants: An experimental study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 13: 805-810, 1998
30 Kitoh M, Matsushida Y, Yamane S, Ikeda H, Suetsugu T. The stress distribution of the hydroxyapatite implant under the vertical load by the two-dimensional finite element method. J Oral Implantology 14: 65-72, 1988
31 Schwarz MS. Mechanical complications of dental implants. Clin Oral Implant Res 8: 156-158, 2000
32 van Steenberghe D, Bolender C, Herrmann I, Linden U. The applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: A prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 5: 272-282, 1990
33 Weber HP, Buser D, Fiorellini JP, Williams RC. Radiographic evaluation of crestal one levels adjacent to nonsubmerged titanium implants. Clin Oral Implant Res 3: 181-188, 1992
34 Norton MR. Marginal bone levels at single tooth implants with a conical fixture design. The influence of surface macro- and microstructure. Clin Oral Implant Res 9: 91-99, 1998
35 Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Osseointegration: A requiem for the periodontal ligament? [guest editorial]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 11: 88-91, 1991.
36 Cox JF, Zarb GA. The longitudinal clinical efficacy of osseointegrated dental implants: A 3-year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2: 91-100, 1987
37 Wilke HJ, Claes L, Steinemann SG. The influence of various titanium surfaces on the interface shear strength between implants and bone. In: Hemke G, Soltesz U, Lee AJC eds. Clinical Implant Materials, Vol. 9: Advance in Biomaterials, 309-314. Amsterdam: Elsvier Science Publishers
38 Bragger U, Hafeli U, Huber B, Hammerle CH, Lang NP. Evaluation of postsurgical crestal bone levels adjacent to non-submerged titanium implants. Clin Oral Implant Res 9: 218-2244, 1998
39 Meijer HJA, Starmans FJM, Steen WHA, Bosman F. A three-dimensional, finite element analysis of bone around dental implants in an edentulous human mandible. Archives in Oral Biology 38: 491-496, 1993
40 Branemark P-I. Introduction to osseointegration. In: Branemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (eds). Tissue-Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence 11-76, 1985
41 Hansson S. The implant neck: smooth or provide with retention elements. Clin Oral Implant Res 10: 394-405, 1999