Browse > Article

An analysis of ITI implants placed in korean patients  

Chang, Moon-Taek (Department of Periodontology, Institute of Oral Bio-Science, School of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science / v.32, no.2, 2002 , pp. 361-370 More about this Journal
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze various data of 120 non-submerged ITI implants placed in 64 korean adults. The data were retrieved from patients' charts and registered in the computer and coded for a statistical analysis. The results revealed that the most common type of edentulism was a distal extension case, and the largest number of implants were placed in the mandibular first molar position. Implants were placed more frequently in mandibular, posterior position than maxillary, anterior position, respectively. With respect to the implant diameter and length, an implant with 4.1mm in diameter and more than 10mm in length was the most common. Since a molar position was the most prevalent position for implant placement in korean patients, clinicians should be careful about implant diameter which can resist a strong occlusal force expected in the molar position. In addition, the distance to the mandibular canal and the floor of maxillary sinus should be considered to avoid possible damages, such as nerve injury and sinus perforation in selecting a proper implant length.
Keywords
non-submerged; dental implant; implant diameter; implant length;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Hammerle CH, Lang NP.Single stage surgery combining transmucosal implant placement with guided bone regeneration and bioresorbable materials. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 Feb;12(1):9-18   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Randow K, Ericsson I, Nilner K, Petersson A, Glantz PO. Immediate functional loading of Branemark dental implants. An 18-month clinical follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1999 Feb;10(1):8-15   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Roccuzzo M, Bunino M, Prioglio F, Bianchi SD. Early loading of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) implants: a prospective split-mouth comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001 Dec;12(6):572-8   DOI   PUBMED
4 Scacchi M. The development of the ITI DENTAL IMPLANT SYSTEM. Part 1: A review of the literature. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11 Suppl 1:8-21   DOI
5 Eckert SE, Parein A, Myshin HL, Padilla JL. Validation of dental implant systems through a review of literature supplied by system manufacturers. J Prosthet Dent. 1997 Mar;77(3):271-9   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Behneke A, Behneke N, d'Hoedt B.The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of ITI solid-screw implants in partially edentulous patients: a 5-year follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Sep-Oct;15(5):633-45   PUBMED
7 Levine RA, Clem DS 3rd, Wilson TG Jr, Higginbottom F, Solnit G. Multicenter retrospective analysis of the ITI implant system used for single-tooth replacements: results of loading for 2 or more years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999 Jul-Aug;14(4):516-20   PUBMED
8 Albrektsson, T., Zarb, G., Worthington, P.& Eriksson, A.R.(1986) The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants Summer;1(1):11-25
9 Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981 Dec;10(6):387-416   DOI   PUBMED
10 Yacker MJ, Klein M.The effect of irrigation on osteotomy depth and bur diameter. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996 Sep-Oct;11(5):634-638   PUBMED
11 Jemt T, Lekholm U, Adell R. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: a preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989 Fall;4(3):211-217   PUBMED
12 Merz BR, Hunenbart S, Belser UC. Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection: an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000 Jul-Aug;15(4):519-526   PUBMED
13 Li D, Ferguson SJ, Beutler T, Cochran DL, Sittig C, Hirt HP, Buser D. Biomechanical comparison of the sandblasted and acid-etched and the machined and acid-etched titanium surface for dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002 May;60(2):325-332   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Iyer S, Weiss C, Mehta A. Effects of drill speed on heat production and the rate and quality of bone formation in dental implant osteotomies. Part I: Relationship between drill speed and heat production. Int J Prosthodont. 1997 Sep-Oct;10(5):411-414   PUBMED
15 van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Naert I. Survival and success rates with oral endosseous implants. In: Lang NP, Karring T, Lindhe J. eds. Proceedings of the 3rd European Workshop on Periodontology Implant dentistry 1999;242-254. Berlin: Quintessence Publ. Co
16 Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T, Wennstrom J, Lindhe J. The peri-implant hard and soft tissues at different implant systems. A comparative study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996 Sep;7(3):212-219.9   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Lekholm, U. & Jemt, T. (1989) Principles for single tooth replacement. In: Albrektsson, T.& Zarb, G.A. eds. The Branemark Osseointegrated Implant, 117-126. Chicago:Quintessence
18 Brocard D, Barthet P, Baysse E, Duffort JF, Eller P, Justumus P, Marin P, Oscaby F, Simonet T, Benque E, Brunel G. A multicenter report on 1,022 consecutively placed ITI implants: a 7-year longitudinal study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Sep-Oct;15(5):691-700   PUBMED
19 Eckert SE, Meraw SJ, Weaver AL, Lohse CM. Early experience with Wide-Platform Mk II implants. Part I: Implant survival. Part II: Evaluation of risk factors involving implant survival. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001 Mar-Apr;16(2):208-216   PUBMED
20 Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Jemt T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990 Winter;5(4):347-359   PUBMED
21 Ivanoff CJ, Grondahl K, Sennerby L, Bergstrom C, Lekholm U. Influence of variations in implant diameters: a 3- to 5-year retrospective clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999 Mar-Apr;14(2):173-180   PUBMED
22 Cooper L, Felton DA, Kugelberg CF, Ellner S, Chaffee N, Molina AL, Moriarty JD, Paquette D, Palmqvist U. A multicenter 12-month evaluation of single-tooth implants restored 3 weeks after 1-stage surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:182-192
23 Jemt T. Modified single and short-span restorations supported by osseointegrated fixtures in the partially edentulous jaw. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:243-247   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Zarb, G.A. & Albrektsson, T. (1998) Consensus report: Towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants. International Journal of Prosthodontics 11: 385-386, 389
25 Schroeder A, van der Zypen E, Stich H, Sutter F. The reactions of bone, connective tissue, and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium-sprayed surfaces. J Maxillofac Surg. 1981 Feb;9(1):15-25   DOI   PUBMED
26 Belser, U.C., Buser, D., Hess, D., Schmid, B., Bernard, J-P. & Lang, N.P. (1998) Aesthetic implant restorations in partially edentulous patients - a critical appraisal. Periodontology 2000 17: 132-150   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Norton MR. An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997 Aug;8(4):290-298   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
28 Buser D, von Arx T, ten Bruggenkate C, Weingart D. Basic surgical principles with ITI implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11 Suppl 1:59-68   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Buser, D., Belser, U.C.& Lang, N.P.(1998) The original one-stage dental implant system and its clinical application. Periodontol 2000 Jun;17:106-18   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Buser, D., Mericske-Stern, R., Bernard, J.P., Behneke, A., Behneke, N., Hirt, H.P., Belser, U.C.& Lang, N.P. (1997) Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1:8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 8(3):161-72   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Esposito M, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. In search of truth: the role of systematic reviews and meta-analyses for assessing the effectiveness of rehabilitation with oral implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2001;3(2):62-78   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Witter DJ, Allen PF, Wilson NH, Kayser AF. Dentists' attitudes to the shortened dental arch concept. J Oral Rehabil. 1997 Feb;24(2):143-7   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Scacchi M, Merz BR, Schar AR. The development of the ITI DENTAL IMPLANT SYSTEM. Part 2: 1998-2000: Steps into the next millennium. Clin Oral Implants Res.2000;11 Suppl 1:22-32   DOI