Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2004180209

Diverse patterns of bone regeneration in rabbit calvarial defects depending on the type of collagen membrane  

Hong, Inpyo (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute of Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Khalid, Alharthi Waleed (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute of Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Pae, Hyung-Chul (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute of Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Song, Young Woo (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute of Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Cha, Jae-Kook (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute of Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Lee, Jung-Seok (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute of Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Paik, Jeong-Won (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute of Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute of Periodontal Regeneration, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Publication Information
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science / v.51, no.1, 2021 , pp. 40-52 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: Various crosslinking methods have been introduced to increase the longevity of collagen membranes. The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the degradation and bone regeneration patterns of 3 collagen membranes. Methods: Four 8-mm-diameter circular bone defects were created in the calvaria of 10 rabbits. In each rabbit, each defect was randomly allocated to 1) the sham control group, 2) the non-crosslinked collagen sponge (NS) group, 3) the chemically crosslinked collagen membrane (CCM) group, or 4) the biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP)-supplemented ultraviolet (UV)-crosslinked collagen membrane (UVM) group. Each defect was covered with the allocated membrane without any graft material. Rabbits were sacrificed at either 2 or 8 weeks post-surgery, and radiographic and histologic analyses were done. Results: New bone formed underneath the membrane in defects in the CCM and UVM groups, with a distinctive new bone formation pattern, while new bone formed from the base of the defect in the NS and control groups. The CCM maintained its shape until 8 weeks, while the UVM and NS were fully degraded at 8 weeks; simultaneously, sustained inflammatory infiltration was found in the margin of the CCM, while it was absent in the UVM. In conclusion, the CCM showed longer longevity than the UVM, but was accompanied by higher levels of inflammation. Conclusions: Both the CCM and UVM showed distinctive patterns of enhancement in new bone formation in the early phase. UV crosslinking can be a biocompatible alternative to chemical crosslinking.
Keywords
Bone regeneration; Collagen; Ultraviolet rays;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Salvi GE, Monje A, Tomasi C. Long-term biological complications of dental implants placed either in pristine or in augmented sites: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29 Suppl 16:294-310.   DOI
2 Owens KW, Yukna RA. Collagen membrane resorption in dogs: a comparative study. Implant Dent 2001;10:49-58.   DOI
3 Jorge-Herrero E, Fernandez P, Turnay J, Olmo N, Calero P, Garcia R, et al. Influence of different chemical cross-linking treatments on the properties of bovine pericardium and collagen. Biomaterials 1999;20:539-45.   DOI
4 An YZ, Heo YK, Lee JS, Jung UW, Choi SH. Dehydrothermally cross-linked collagen membrane with a bone graft improves bone regeneration in a rat calvarial defect model. Materials (Basel) 2017;10:927.   DOI
5 Park JY, Jung IH, Kim YK, Lim HC, Lee JS, Jung UW, et al. Guided bone regeneration using 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC)-cross-linked type-I collagen membrane with biphasic calcium phosphate at rabbit calvarial defects. Biomater Res 2015;19:15.   DOI
6 Bunyaratavej P, Wang HL. Collagen membranes: a review. J Periodontol 2001;72:215-29.   DOI
7 Sorushanova A, Delgado LM, Wu Z, Shologu N, Kshirsagar A, Raghunath R, et al. The collagen suprafamily: from biosynthesis to advanced biomaterial development. Adv Mater 2019;31:e1801651.
8 Davidenko N, Bax DV, Schuster CF, Farndale RW, Hamaia SW, Best SM, et al. Optimisation of UV irradiation as a binding site conserving method for crosslinking collagen-based scaffolds. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2016;27:14.   DOI
9 Benic GI, Hammerle CH. Horizontal bone augmentation by means of guided bone regeneration. Periodontol 2000 2014;66:13-40.   DOI
10 Hong I, Khalid AW, Pae HC, Cha JK, Lee JS, Paik JW, et al. Distinctive bone regeneration of calvarial defects using biphasic calcium phosphate supplemented ultraviolet-crosslinked collagen membrane. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2020;50:14-27.   DOI
11 Retzepi M, Donos N. Guided bone regeneration: biological principle and therapeutic applications. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:567-76.   DOI
12 Charulatha V, Rajaram A. Influence of different crosslinking treatments on the physical properties of collagen membranes. Biomaterials 2003;24:759-67.   DOI
13 Elgali I, Omar O, Dahlin C, Thomsen P. Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited. Eur J Oral Sci 2017;125:315-37.   DOI
14 Song JH, Kim HE, Kim HW. Collagen-apatite nanocomposite membranes for guided bone regeneration. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007;83:248-57.   DOI
15 Lee DW, Kim KT, Joo YS, Yoo MK, Yu JA, Ryu JJ. The role of two different collagen membranes for dehiscence defect around implants in humans. J Oral Implantol 2015;41:445-8.   DOI
16 Sanz M, Dahlin C, Apatzidou D, Artzi Z, Bozic D, Calciolari E, et al. Biomaterials and regenerative technologies used in bone regeneration in the craniomaxillofacial region: consensus report of group 2 of the 15th European Workshop on Periodontology on Bone Regeneration. J Clin Periodontol 2019;46 Suppl 21:82-91.   DOI
17 Becker J, Al-Nawas B, Klein MO, Schliephake H, Terheyden H, Schwarz F. Use of a new cross-linked collagen membrane for the treatment of dehiscence-type defects at titanium implants: a prospective, randomized-controlled double-blinded clinical multicenter study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:742-9.   DOI
18 Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol 2010;8:e1000412.   DOI
19 Delgado LM, Bayon Y, Pandit A, Zeugolis DI. To cross-link or not to cross-link? Cross-linking associated foreign body response of collagen-based devices. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2015;21:298-313.   DOI
20 Jimenez Garcia J, Berghezan S, Carames JMM, Dard MM, Marques DNS. Effect of cross-linked vs noncross-linked collagen membranes on bone: a systematic review. J Periodontal Res 2017;52:955-64.   DOI
21 Omar O, Elgali I, Dahlin C, Thomsen P. Barrier membranes: more than the barrier effect? J Clin Periodontol 2019;46 Suppl 21:103-23.   DOI
22 Schwarz F, Rothamel D, Herten M, Wustefeld M, Sager M, Ferrari D, et al. Immunohistochemical characterization of guided bone regeneration at a dehiscence-type defect using different barrier membranes: an experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:402-15.   DOI
23 Taguchi Y, Amizuka N, Nakadate M, Ohnishi H, Fujii N, Oda K, et al. A histological evaluation for guided bone regeneration induced by a collagenous membrane. Biomaterials 2005;26:6158-66.   DOI
24 Turri A, Elgali I, Vazirisani F, Johansson A, Emanuelsson L, Dahlin C, et al. Guided bone regeneration is promoted by the molecular events in the membrane compartment. Biomaterials 2016;84:167-83.   DOI
25 Rothamel D, Benner M, Fienitz T, Happe A, Kreppel M, Nickenig HJ, et al. Biodegradation pattern and tissue integration of native and cross-linked porcine collagen soft tissue augmentation matrices - an experimental study in the rat. Head Face Med 2014;10:10.   DOI
26 Acevedo CA, Olguin Y, Briceno M, Forero JC, Osses N, Diaz-Calderon P, et al. Design of a biodegradable UV-irradiated gelatin-chitosan/nanocomposed membrane with osteogenic ability for application in bone regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2019;99:875-86.   DOI
27 Sanz-Sanchez I, Ortiz-Vigon A, Sanz-Martin I, Figuero E, Sanz M. Effectiveness of lateral bone augmentation on the alveolar crest dimension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent Res 2015;94:128S-142S.   DOI