Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2020.50.3.197

Histological comparison of different compressive forces on particulate grafts during alveolar ridge preservation: a prospective proof-of-concept study  

Lee, Sung-Jo (Department of Periodontology, Sejong Dental Hospital, Dankook University College of Dentistry)
Kang, Dae-Young (Department of Periodontology, Dankook University College of Dentistry)
Cho, In-Woo (Department of Periodontology, Dankook University College of Dentistry)
Shin, Hyun-Seung (Department of Periodontology, Dankook University College of Dentistry)
Shin, Seung-Il (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Fischer, Kai R. (Clinic of Conservative & Preventive Dentistry, Division of Periodontology & Peri-implant Diseases, University of Zurich)
Park, Jung-Chul (Department of Periodontology, Dankook University College of Dentistry)
Publication Information
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science / v.50, no.3, 2020 , pp. 197-206 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine the impact of different compressive forces on deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) particles covered by native bilayer collagen membrane (NBCM) during alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) in the molar area, and to identify any histomorphometric and clinical differences according to the compressive force applied. Methods: Sockets were filled with DBBM after tooth extraction, and different compressive forces (30 N and 5 N, respectively) were applied to the graft material in the test (30 N) and control (5 N) groups. The DBBM in both groups was covered with NBCM in a double-layered fashion. A crossed horizontal mattress suture (hidden X) was then made. A core biopsy was performed using a trephine bur without flap elevation at the implant placement site for histomorphometric evaluations after 4 months. The change of the marginal bone level was measured using radiography. Results: Twelve patients completed the study. The histomorphometric analysis demonstrated that the mean ratios of the areas of new bone, residual graft material, and soft tissue and the implant stability quotient did not differ significantly between the groups (P>0.05). However, the mean size of the residual graft material showed a significant intergroup difference (P<0.05). Conclusions: The application of 2 compressive forces (5 N, 30 N) on particulate DBBM grafts during open-healing ARP in the posterior area led to comparable new bone formation, implant feasibility and peri-implant bone level.
Keywords
Alveolar bone grafting; Alveolar ridge augmentation; Bone substitutes; Histology; Tooth extraction;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Vail TB, Trotter GW, Powers BE. Equine demineralized bone matrix: relationship between particle size and osteoinduction. Vet Surg 1994;23:386-95.   DOI
2 Lee JS, Cha JK, Kim CS. Alveolar ridge regeneration of damaged extraction sockets using deproteinized porcine versus bovine bone minerals: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2018;20:729-37.   DOI
3 Bornstein MM, Hart CN, Halbritter SA, Morton D, Buser D. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009;11:338-47.   DOI
4 Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25.
5 Park JC, Koo KT, Lim HC. The hidden X suture: a technical note on a novel suture technique for alveolar ridge preservation. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2016;46:415-25.   DOI
6 Choi HK, Cho HY, Lee SJ, Cho IW, Shin HS, Koo KT, et al. Alveolar ridge preservation with an open-healing approach using single-layer or double-layer coverage with collagen membranes. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2017;47:372-80.   DOI
7 Cho HY, Suh CW, Duong HP, Lee SJ, Cho IW, Shin HS, et al. Alveolar ridge preservation of maxillary molars for implant placement without sinus lift surgery: case series. J Korean Acad Oral Maxillofac Implantol 2018;22:220-35.   DOI
8 Cho IW, Park JC, Shin HS. A comparison of different compressive forces on graft materials during alveolar ridge preservation. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2017;47:51-63.   DOI
9 Cha JK, Song YW, Park SH, Jung RE, Jung UW, Thoma DS. Alveolar ridge preservation in the posterior maxilla reduces vertical dimensional change: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2019;30:515-23.   DOI
10 Lim HC, Shin HS, Cho IW, Koo KT, Park JC. Ridge preservation in molar extraction sites with an open-healing approach: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol 2019;46:1144-54.   DOI
11 McGuire MK, Nunn ME. Prognosis versus actual outcome. III. The effectiveness of clinical parameters in accurately predicting tooth survival. J Periodontol 1996;67:666-74.   DOI
12 Cardaropoli D, Cardaropoli G. Preservation of the postextraction alveolar ridge: a clinical and histologic study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:469-77.
13 Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Gaveglio L, Cardaropoli G. Socket preservation using bovine bone mineral and collagen membrane: a randomized controlled clinical trial with histologic analysis. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2012;32:421-30.
14 Iasella JM, Greenwell H, Miller RL, Hill M, Drisko C, Bohra AA, et al. Ridge preservation with freeze-dried bone allograft and a collagen membrane compared to extraction alone for implant site development: a clinical and histologic study in humans. J Periodontol 2003;74:990-9.   DOI
15 Yildirim M, Spiekermann H, Biesterfeld S, Edelhoff D. Maxillary sinus augmentation using xenogenic bone substitute material Bio-Oss in combination with venous blood. A histologic and histomorphometric study in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:217-29.   DOI