Effect of initial placement level and wall thickness on maintenance of the marginal bone level in implants with a conical implant-abutment interface: a 5-year retrospective study |
Yoo, Jaehyun
(Department of Periodontology, Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital, Yonsei University College of Dentistry)
Moon, Ik-Sang (Department of Periodontology, Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) Yun, Jeong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, Institute of Oral Bioscience, Chonbuk National University School of Dentistry) Chung, Chooryung (Department of Orthodontics, Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) Huh, Jong-Ki (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) Lee, Dong-Won (Department of Periodontology, Gangnam Severance Dental Hospital, Yonsei University College of Dentistry) |
1 | Oh TJ, Yoon J, Misch CE, Wang HL. The causes of early implant bone loss: myth or science? J Periodontol 2002;73:322-33. DOI |
2 | Hansson S. A conical implant-abutment interface at the level of the marginal bone improves the distribution of stresses in the supporting bone. An axisymmetric finite element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:286-93. DOI |
3 | Hansson S. The implant neck: smooth or provided with retention elements. A biomechanical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:394-405. DOI |
4 | Mailth G, Stoiber B, Watzek G, Matejka M. Bone resorption at the entry of osseointegrated implants--a biomechanical phenomenon. Finite element study. Z Stomatol 1989;86:207-16. |
5 | Qian L, Todo M, Matsushita Y, Koyano K. Effects of implant diameter, insertion depth, and loading angle on stress/strain fields in implant/jawbone systems: finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:877-86. |
6 | Froum SJ, Cho SC, Suzuki T, Yu P, Corby P, Khouly I. Epicrestal and subcrestal placement of platform-switched implants: 18 month-result of a randomized, controlled, split-mouth, prospective clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29:353-66. |
7 | Geramy A, Morgano SM. Finite element analysis of three designs of an implant-supported molar crown. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:434-40. DOI |
8 | Petrie CS, Williams JL. Comparative evaluation of implant designs: influence of diameter, length, and taper on strains in the alveolar crest. A three-dimensional finite-element analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:486-94. DOI |
9 | Geng JP, Tan KB, Liu GR. Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:585-98. DOI |
10 | Moriwaki H, Yamaguchi S, Nakano T, Yamanishi Y, Imazato S, Yatani H. Influence of implant length and diameter, bicortical anchorage, and sinus augmentation on bone stress distribution: three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016;31:e84-91. DOI |
11 | Schwarz F, Alcoforado G, Nelson K, Schaer A, Taylor T, Beuer F, et al. Impact of implant-abutment connection, positioning of the machined collar/microgap, and platform switching on crestal bone level changes. Camlog Foundation Consensus Report. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:1301-3. DOI |
12 | Moergel M, Rocha S, Messias A, Nicolau P, Guerra F, Wagner W. Radiographic evaluation of conical tapered platform-switched implants in the posterior mandible: 1-year results of a two-center prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2016;27:686-93. DOI |