Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2017.47.6.372

Alveolar ridge preservation with an open-healing approach using single-layer or double-layer coverage with collagen membranes  

Choi, Ho-Keun (Department of Periodontology, Dankook University College of Dentistry)
Cho, Hag-Yeon (Department of Periodontology, Dankook University College of Dentistry)
Lee, Sung-Jo (Department of Periodontology, Dankook University College of Dentistry)
Cho, In-Woo (Department of Periodontology, Dankook University College of Dentistry)
Shin, Hyun-Seung (Department of Periodontology, Dankook University College of Dentistry)
Koo, Ki-Tae (Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry)
Lim, Hyun-Chang (Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich)
Park, Jung-Chul (Department of Periodontology, Dankook University College of Dentistry)
Publication Information
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science / v.47, no.6, 2017 , pp. 372-380 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this prospective pilot study was to compare alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) procedures with open-healing approach using a single-layer and a double-layer coverage with collagen membranes using radiographic and clinical analyses. Methods: Eleven molars from 9 healthy patients requiring extraction of the maxillary or mandibular posterior teeth were included and allocated into 2 groups. After tooth extraction, deproteinized bovine bone mineral mixed with 10% collagen was grafted into the socket and covered either with a double-layer of resorbable non-cross-linked collagen membranes (DL group, n=6) or with a single-layer (SL group, n=5). Primary closure was not obtained. Cone-beam computed tomography images were taken immediately after the ARP procedure and after a healing period of 4 months before implant placement. Radiographic measurements were made of the width and height changes of the alveolar ridge. Results: All sites healed without any complications, and dental implants were placed at all operated sites with acceptable initial stability. The measurements showed that the reductions in width at the level 1 mm apical from the alveolar crest (including the bone graft) were $-1.7{\pm}0.5mm$ in the SL group and $-1.8{\pm}0.4mm$ in the DL group, and the horizontal changes in the other areas were also similar in the DL and SL groups. The reductions in height were also comparable between groups. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, single-layer and double-layer coverage with collagen membranes after ARP failed to show substantial differences in the preservation of horizontal or vertical dimensions or in clinical healing. Thus, both approaches seem to be suitable for open-healing ridge preservation procedures.
Keywords
Alveolar process; Bone regeneration; Cone-beam computed tomography; Tooth extraction;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following tooth extraction with and without flap elevation: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:545-9.
2 Roccuzzo M, Gaudioso L, Bunino M, Dalmasso P. Long-term stability of soft tissues following alveolar ridge preservation: 10-year results of a prospective study around nonsubmerged implants. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2014;34:795-804.   DOI
3 Mardas N, Chadha V, Donos N. Alveolar ridge preservation with guided bone regeneration and a synthetic bone substitute or a bovine-derived xenograft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:688-98.   DOI
4 Engler-Hamm D, Cheung WS, Yen A, Stark PC, Griffin T. Ridge preservation using a composite bone graft and a bioabsorbable membrane with and without primary wound closure: a comparative clinical trial. J Periodontol 2011;82:377-87.   DOI
5 Pellegrini G, Rasperini G, Obot G, Farronato D, Dellavia C. Soft tissue healing in alveolar socket preservation technique: histologic evaluations. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2014;34:531-9.   DOI
6 Barone A, Toti P, Piattelli A, Iezzi G, Derchi G, Covani U. Extraction socket healing in humans after ridge preservation techniques: comparison between flapless and flapped procedures in a randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol 2014;85:14-23.   DOI
7 Park JC, Koo KT, Lim HC. The hidden X suture: a technical note on a novel suture technique for alveolar ridge preservation. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2016;46:415-25.   DOI
8 Cho IW, Park JC, Shin HS. A comparison of different compressive forces on graft materials during alveolar ridge preservation. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2017;47:51-63.   DOI
9 Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19 Suppl:43-61.
10 von Arx T, Buser D. Horizontal ridge augmentation using autogenous block grafts and the guided bone regeneration technique with collagen membranes: a clinical study with 42 patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 2006;17:359-66.   DOI
11 Kim SH, Kim DY, Kim KH, Ku Y, Rhyu IC, Lee YM. The efficacy of a double-layer collagen membrane technique for overlaying block grafts in a rabbit calvarium model. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:1124-32.   DOI
12 Zitzmann NU, Naef R, Scharer P. Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with Bio-Oss for guided bone regeneration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:844-52.
13 Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:212-8.   DOI
14 Tallgren A. The continuing reduction of the residual alveolar ridges in complete denture wearers: a mixed-longitudinal study covering 25 years. J Prosthet Dent 1972;27:120-32.   DOI
15 Atwood DA. Reduction of residual ridges: a major oral disease entity. J Prosthet Dent 1971;26:266-79.   DOI
16 Schropp L, Wenzel A, Kostopoulos L, Karring T. Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction: a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2003;23:313-23.
17 Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, Lang NP. A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23 Suppl 5:1-21.
18 Kentros GA, Filler SJ, Rothstein SS. Six month evaluation of particulate Durapatite in extraction sockets for the preservation of the alveolar ridge. Implantologist 1985;3:53-62.
19 Cohen ES. Ridge enhancement and socket preservation utilizing the subepithelial connective tissue graft: a case report. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995;7:53-8.
20 Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE. The application of deproteinized bovine bone mineral for ridge preservation prior to implantation. Clinical and histological observations in a case report. J Periodontol 1998;69:1062-7.   DOI
21 Cardaropoli D, Cardaropoli G. Preservation of the postextraction alveolar ridge: a clinical and histologic study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2008;28:469-77.