Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2015.45.3.120

Microgrooves on titanium surface affect peri-implant cell adhesion and soft tissue sealing; an in vitro and in vivo study  

Lee, Hyo-Jung (Department of Periodontology, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
Lee, Jaden (Department of Oral Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina College of Dental Medicine)
Lee, Jung-Tae (Department of Periodontology, Section of Dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
Hong, Ji-Soo (Department of Oral Pathology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry)
Lim, Bum-Soon (Department of Dental Biomaterials, Seoul National University School of Dentistry)
Park, Hee-Jung (Department of Public Health Sciences, Korea University)
Kim, Young-Kwang (Department of General Dentistry, Boston University School of Dental Medicine)
Kim, Tae-Il (Department of Periodontology, Seoul National University School of Dentistry)
Publication Information
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science / v.45, no.3, 2015 , pp. 120-126 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: With the significance of stable adhesion of alveolar bone and peri-implant soft tissue on the surface of titanium for successful dental implantation procedure, the purpose of this study was to apply microgrooves on the titanium surface and investigate their effects on peri-implant cells and tissues. Methods: Three types of commercially pure titanium discs were prepared; machined-surface discs (A), sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA)-treated discs (B), SLA and microgroove-formed discs (C). After surface topography of the discs was examined by confocal laser scanning electron microscopy, water contact angle and surface energy were measured. Human gingival fibroblasts (hGFs) and murine osteoblastic cells (MC3T3-E1) were seeded onto the titanium discs for immunofluorescence assay of adhesion proteins. Commercially pure titanium implants with microgrooves on the coronal microthreads design were inserted into the edentulous mandible of beagle dogs. After 2 weeks and 6 weeks of implant insertion, the animal subjects were euthanized to confirm peri-implant tissue healing pattern in histologic specimens. Results: Group C presented the lowest water contact angle ($62.89{\pm}5.66{\theta}$), highest surface energy ($45{\pm}1.2mN/m$), and highest surface roughness ($Ra=22.351{\pm}2.766{\mu}m$). The expression of adhesion molecules of hGFs and MC3T30E1 cells was prominent in group C. Titanium implants with microgrooves on the coronal portion showed firm adhesion to peri-implant soft tissue. Conclusions: Microgrooves on the titanium surface promoted the adhesion of gingival fibroblasts and osteoblastic cells, as well as favorable peri-implant soft tissue sealing.
Keywords
Cell adhesion; Dental implants; Titanium; Wound healing;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Branemark PI, Adell R, Albrektsson T, Lekholm U, Lundkvist S, Rockler B. Osseointegrated titanium fixtures in the treatment of edentulousness. Biomaterials 1983;4:25-8.   DOI
2 Cochran DL, Hermann JS, Schenk RK, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Biologic width around titanium implants. A histometric analysis of the implanto-gingival junction around unloaded and loaded nonsubmerged implants in the canine mandible. J Periodontol 1997;68:186-98.   DOI
3 Hermann JS, Buser D, Schenk RK, Higginbottom FL, Cochran DL. Biologic width around titanium implants. A physiologically formed and stable dimension over time. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11: 1-11.   DOI
4 Geurs NC, Vassilopoulos PJ, Reddy MS. Soft tissue considerations in implant site development. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2010;22:387-405, vi-vii.   DOI
5 Abrahamsson I, Zitzmann NU, Berglundh T, Linder E, Wennerberg A, Lindhe J. The mucosal attachment to titanium implants with different surface characteristics: an experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29:448-55.   DOI
6 Huh JB, Rheu GB, Kim YS, Jeong CM, Lee JY, Shin SW. Influence of Implant transmucosal design on early peri-implant tissue responses in beagle dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:962-8.   DOI
7 Owens DK, Wendt RC. Estimation of surface free energy of polymers. J Appl Polym Sci 1969;13:1741-7.   DOI
8 Bachle M, Kohal RJ. A systematic review of the influence of different titanium surfaces on proliferation, differentiation and protein synthesis of osteoblast-like MG63 cells. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:683-92.   DOI
9 Cooper LF, Zhou Y, Takebe J, Guo J, Abron A, Holmen A, et al. Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants. Biomaterials 2006;27:926-36.   DOI
10 Kim MJ, Choi MU, Kim CW. Activation of phospholipase D1 by surface roughness of titanium in MG63 osteoblast-like cell. Biomaterials 2006;27:5502-11.   DOI
11 Marinucci L, Balloni S, Becchetti E, Belcastro S, Guerra M, Calvitti M, et al. Effect of titanium surface roughness on human osteoblast proliferation and gene expression in vitro. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:719-25.
12 Chehroudi B, Gould TR, Brunette DM. The role of connective tissue in inhibiting epithelial downgrowth on titanium-coated percutaneous implants. J Biomed Mater Res 1992;26:493-515.   DOI
13 Sader MS, Balduino A, Soares GD, Borojevic R. Effect of three distinct treatments of titanium surface on osteoblast attachment, proliferation, and differentiation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16: 667-75.   DOI
14 Ruggeri A, Franchi M, Marini N, Trisi P, Piatelli A. Supracrestal circular collagen fiber network around osseointegrated nonsubmerged titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:169-75.   DOI
15 Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS, Medina R, Schenk RK, Buser D, et al. Peri-implant inflammation defined by the implant-abutment interface. J Dent Res 2006;85:473-8.   DOI
16 Linkevicius T, Apse P. Biologic width around implants. An evidence-based review. Stomatologija 2008;10:27-35.
17 Gargiulo AW, Wentz FM, Orban B. Dimensions and relations of dentogingival junction in humans. J Periodontol 1961;32:261-7.   DOI