Browse > Article

The effect of non-resorbable barrier membrane on the change of buccal and lingual alveolar bone in immediate implant placement into periapically infected extraction sockets  

Shin, Seung-Yun (Department of Periodontics, The Institute of Oral Health Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Yang, Seung-Min (Department of Periodontics, The Institute of Oral Health Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Kye, Seung-Beom (Department of Periodontics, The Institute of Oral Health Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science / v.39, no.1, 2009 , pp. 71-76 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: Many researches showed loss of alveolar bone in fresh extraction socket and even in case of immediate implant placement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of non-resorbable barrier membrane on the change of buccal and lingual alveolar bone in immediate implant placement into periapically infected extraction sockets. Materials and methods: Immediate implants were placed into artificially induced periapical lesion of mandibular premolars after complete debridement using buccal bone defect made by a 6mm trephine bur in 4 mongrel dogs. Before flap repositioning, a non-resorbable barrier membrane was placed on the buccal defect in the experimental group. No membrane was placed in the control group. In 12 weeks after placement, the dogs were sacrificed and undecalcified histologic specimens were prepared. The vertical distance from the smooth-rough surface interface(SRI) to gingiva, 1st bone contact and bone crest were measured in buccal and lingual side. The horizontal thicknesses of gingiva and bone at 0, 1, 2 and 3mm below SRI were measured. Results: The buccal bone was resorbed more than lingual bone in both groups and there was statistical significance(p<0.05). The distances from SRI to 1st bone contact were $2.45{\pm}2.35\;mm$ in experimental group and $4.49{\pm}3.10\;mm$ in control group. In all vertical level, lingual bone was thicker than buccal bone(p<0.05). Conclusion: Buccal bone was reduced more than lingual bone in immediate implant placement into periapically infected extraction sockets. Placement of non-resorbable barrier membrane reduced the buccal bone resorption. However there was no statistical significance.
Keywords
Immediate implant; Non-resorbable membrane; 1st bone contact; Bone loss; Periapical surgery;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Cardaropoli G, Araujo M, Lindhe J. Dynamics of bone tissue formation in tooth extraction sites. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 2003;30:809-818   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Nevins M, Camelo M, De Paoli S et al. A study of the fate of the buccal wall of extraction sockets of teeth with prominent roots. lnt J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2006;26:19-29
3 Antoun H, Sitbon JM, Martinez H, Missika P. A prospective randomized study comparing two techniques of bone augmentation: onlay graft alone or associated with a membrane. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:632-639   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Polansky RA, lakse N, Wegscheider W A. Evaluation of implants placed with barrier membranes. A restrospective follow-up study up to five years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:274-280   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Paolantonio M, Dolci M, Scarano A et al. Immediate implantation in fresh extraction sockets. A controlled clinical and histological study in man. J Periodontol 2001;72: 1560-1571
6 Chang SW, Shin SY, Hong JR et al. Immediate implant placement into infected and noninfected extraction sockets: a pilot study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:197-203   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Fickl S, Zuhr 0, Wachtel H, Bolz W, Huerzeler MB. Hard tissue alterations after socket preservation: an experimental study in the beagle dog. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19: 1111-1118   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Carlsson GE, Thilander H, Hedegard B. Histologic changes in the upper alveolar process after extractions with or without insertion of an immediate full denture. Acta Odontol Scand 1967;25:21-43   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Seibert JS, Salama H. Alveolar ridge preservation and reconstruction. Periodontol 2000 1996; 11 :69-84   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
10 Araujo MG, Sukekava F, Wennstrom lL, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following implant placement in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 2005;32:645-652   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol 2004;31 :820-828   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Bahat 0, Deeb C, Golden T, Komarnyckij O. Preservation of ridges utilizing hydroxyapatite. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1987;7:34-41   PUBMED
13 Park J, Kwon Y, Park J et al. The effect of human demineralized freeze-dried xenograft on vertical bone formation in beagle dogs. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2008;38:75-82   과학기술학회마을