Clinical and radiographic evaluation of implants with dual-microthread: 1-year study |
Kwon, Mi-A
(Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
Kim, Yong-Deok (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) Jeong, Chang-Mo (Department of Prosthodintics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) Lee, Ju-Youn (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) |
1 | Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U et aL Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses, I. Experimental studies, Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3 :81-100 DOI PUBMED |
2 | Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Coulthard P et aL A 5-year follow- up comparative analysis of the efficacy of various osseointegrated dental implant systems: A systematic review of randomized controlled clinical trials, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:557-568 PUBMED |
3 | Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. Tissue characteristics at microthreaded implants: An experimental study in dogs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2006;8:107-113 DOI ScienceOn |
4 | Schroeder A, van del' Zypen E, Stich H, Sutter F. The reactions of bone, connective tissue, and epithelium to endosteal implants with titanium-sprayed surfaces. J Maxillofac Surg 1981 ;9: 15-25 DOI ScienceOn |
5 | Broggini N, McManus LM, Hermann JS et al. Peri-implant inflammation defined by the implant-abutment interface. J Dent Res 2006;85:473-478 DOI ScienceOn |
6 | Quirynen M, Bollen CM, Eyssen H, van Steenberghe D. 36 Microbial penetration along the implant components of the Branemark system. an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:239-244 DOI ScienceOn |
7 | Alomrani AN, Hermann JS, Jones AA, et al. The etIeet of a machined collar on coronal hard tissue around titanium implants: A radiographic study in the canine mandible. lnt J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005;20:677-686 |
8 | Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D, Jacobs R et al. The reliability of pocket probing around scre,v-type implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2:186-192 DOI ScienceOn |
9 | Palmer RM, Palmer PJ, Smith RJ. A 5-year prospective study of Astra single tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000; II : 179-182 DOI PUBMED ScienceOn |
10 | Engquist B, Astrand P, Dahlgren S, et a!. Marginal bone reaction to oral implants: A prospective comparative study of Astra tech and Branemark system implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:30-37 DOI ScienceOn |
11 | Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Branemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3: I 04-111 DOI ScienceOn |
12 | Oh TJ, YOOIl J, Misch CE, Wang HL. The causes of early implant bone loss: Myth or science? J Periodontol 2002;73: 322-333 DOI ScienceOn |
13 | Chang M, Wennstrom JL, adman P, Andersson B. Implant supported single-tooth replacements compared to contralateral natural teeth. Crown and soft tissue dimensions. Clin Oral implants Res 1999; I0: 185-194 DOI ScienceOn |
14 | Bengazi F, Wennstrom JL, Lekholm U. Recession of the soft tissue margin at oral implants. A 2-year longitudinal prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:303-310 DOI ScienceOn |
15 | Astrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S et al. Astra tech and Branemark system implants: A 5-year prospective study of marginal bOlle reactions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004; 15: 413-420 DOI ScienceOn |
16 | Mombelli A, van Oosten MA, Schurch E,Jr, Land NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol 1987;2: 145-151 DOI ScienceOn |
17 | Jung YC, Han CH, Lee KW. A I-year radiographic evaluation of marginal bone around dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; II :811-818 PUBMED |
18 | Adell R, Lekholll1 U, RockIer 13, et al. Marginal tissue reactions at osseo integrated titanium fixtures (I). A 3-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1986; 15:39-52 DOI PUBMED ScienceOn |
19 | Mombelli A, Lang NP. Clinical parameters for the evaluation of dental implants. Periodontol 2000 1994;4:81-86 DOI ScienceOn |
20 | Engquist B, Nilson H, Astrand P. Single-tooth replacement by osseointegrated branemark implants. A retrospective study of 82 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1995;6: 238-245 DOI ScienceOn |
21 | Engquist B, Astrand P, Dahlgren S et al. Marginal bone reaction to oral implants: A prospective comparative study of astra tech and branemark system implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:30-37 DOI ScienceOn |
22 | Valderhaug J, Birkeland JM. Periodontal conditions in patients 5 years following insertion of fixed prostheses. Pocket depth and loss of attachment. J Oral Rehabil 1976;3:237-243 DOI PUBMED |
23 | Astrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, et al. Astra tech and branemark system implants: A prospective 5-year comparative study. results after one year. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 1999; 1: 17-26 DOI ScienceOn |
24 | Schou S, Holmstrup P, Hjorting-Hansell E, Lang NP. Plaque-induced marginal tissue reactions of osseointegrated oral implants: A review of the literature. Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:149-161 DOI ScienceOn |
25 | Berglundh T, Persson L, Klinge B. A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29 Suppl 3:197-212; discussion 232-233 DOI ScienceOn |
26 | Lee DW, Choi YS, Park KH et al. Effect of microthread on the maintenance of marginal bone level: A 3-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18:465-470 DOI ScienceOn |
27 | Cochran DL, Hermann JS, Schenk RK et al. Biologic width around titanium implants. A histomctric analysis of the implanto-gingival junction around unloaded and loaded non submerged implants in the canine mandible. Periodontol 1997;68: 186-198 DOI ScienceOn |
28 | Hansson S. The implant neck: Smooth or provided with retention elements. A biomechanical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999; 10:394-405 DOI PUBMED ScienceOn |
29 | Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: A review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986;1:11-25 |