1 |
Osborne-Smith KL, Burke FJ, Wilson NH. The aetiology of the non-carious cervical lesion. Int Dent J 1999;49: 139-143
DOI
PUBMED
|
2 |
Hong FL, Nu ZY, Xie XM. Clinical classification and therapeutic design of dental cervical abrasion. Gerodontics 1988;4:101-103
PUBMED
|
3 |
Borcic J, Anic I, Urek MM, Ferreri S. The prevalence of non-carious cervical lesion in permanent dentition. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:117-123
DOI
PUBMED
ScienceOn
|
4 |
Tyas MJ. The class V lesion - aetiology and restoration. Aust Dent J 1995;40(3): 197 -170
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
Cuenin M, Clem B. Periodontal and restorative treatment of class V lesion. Gen Dent 1993;41 :252-254
PUBMED
|
6 |
Willershausen B, Kottgen C, Ernst CPo The influence of restorative materials on marginal gingiva. Eur J Med Res 2001;6:433-439
PUBMED
|
7 |
Goerzo I, Newman HN, Strahan 10. Amalgam restorations, plaque removal and periodontal health. J Clin Periodontol 1979;6:98-105
DOI
PUBMED
|
8 |
Laurell L, Rylander H, Pettersson B. The effect of different levels of polishing of amalgam restorations on the plaque retention and gingival inflammation. Swcd Dent J 1983:7:45-53
|
9 |
Donachie MA, Walls A W. Assessment of tooth wear in an ageing population. J Dent 1995;23:157-164
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
Levitch LC, Bader JD, Shugars DA, Heymann HO. Non-carious cervical lesions. J Dent 1994;22:195-207
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
Piotrowski BT, Gillette WB, Hancock EB. Examining the prevalence and characteristics of abfraction like cervical lesions in a population of U.S. verterans. J Am Dent Assoc 2001; 132; 1694-1701
DOI
PUBMED
|
12 |
Aw TC, Lepe X, Johnson GH, Mancl L. Characteristics of noncarious cervical lesions. A clinical investigation. J Am Dent Assoc 2002; 133 :725-733
DOI
PUBMED
|
13 |
Paolantonio M, D'ercole S, Perinetti G et al. Clinical and microbiological effcct of different restorative materials on the periodontal tissue adjacent to subgingival class V restorations. J Clin eriodontol 2004;31 :200-207
DOI
ScienceOn
|
14 |
Sangnes G, Gjermo P. Prevalence of oral soft tissue and hard tissue lesions related to mechanical tooth cleansing procedures. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1976;4:77-83
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
Grippo JO. Noncarious cervical lesions: The decision to ignore or restore. J Esthet Dent 1992;4:55-64
DOI
PUBMED
|
16 |
Jansson L, Blomster S, Forsgardh A et al. lnteractory effect between marginal plaque and subgingival proximal restorations on periodontal pocket depth. Swed Dent J 1997;21: 77-83
PUBMED
|
17 |
Blank LW. Caffesse RG, Charbeneau GT. The gingival response to well-finished composite resin restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:626-632
DOI
ScienceOn
|
18 |
Bader JD, McClure F, Scurria MS, Shugars DA, Heymann HO. Case-control study of non carious cervical lesions. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996;24:286-291
PUBMED
|
19 |
Larato DC. Influence of a composite resin restoration on the gingiva. J Prosthet Dent 1972;28:402-404
DOI
PUBMED
ScienceOn
|
20 |
Litonjua LA, Andreana S, Bush PJ, Tobias TS. Noncarious cervical lesions and abfractions; are-revaluation. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:845-850
DOI
PUBMED
|
21 |
Schatzle M, Lang NP, Anerud A et al. The influence of margins of restorations on the periodontal tissues over 26 ycrs. J Clin Periodontol 2000;27:57-64
|
22 |
Seibert J, Lindhe J. Esthetics and periodontal therapy. In: Linde J. Textbook of clinical periodontology. 2nd edition: Copenhagen: Munksgaard; 1989:477-514
|
23 |
van Dijken JW, Sjostrom S, Wing K. The effect of different types of composite resin filling on marginal gingiva. J Clin Periodontol 1987;14:185-189
DOI
PUBMED
|