Browse > Article

The effect of conditioning by Tetracycline-Hcl on implant surface;The SEM study and. surface roughness measurements : RBM surface  

Lim, Hae-Soo (Department of Periodontology and Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Park, Joon-Bong (Department of Periodontology and Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Kwon, Young-Hyuk (Department of Periodontology and Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Herr, Yeek (Department of Periodontology and Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Chung, Jong-Hyuk (Department of Periodontology and Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Publication Information
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science / v.37, no.3, 2007 , pp. 585-597 More about this Journal
Abstract
The present study was performed to evaluate the effect of Tetracycline-HCI and Saline on the change of implant surface microstructure and surface roughness according to application time. Implants with resorbable blasting media surface were utilized. Before test all 13 implants were measured surface roughness. Among them, 6 implants were rubbed with 50mg/ml Tetracycline-HCl solution and other 6 implants with saline for $\frac{1}{2}$min., 1min., $1\frac{1}{2}$min., 2min., $2\frac{1}{2}$min and 3min. Then, specimens were processed for scanning electron microscopic observation and surface roughness after test. The results of this study were as follows. 1. Control group showed a few irregular, rough, uneven surface with crater-like depression. 2. The test group with Tetracycline-HCl conditioning showed an altered surface when Tetracycline-HCl was applied for 30secs, and showed a various surface alteration as application times go on. 3. The test group with Saline conditioning showed no significant surface differences and surface roughness. 4. The significant increase of Ra value was showed when Tetracycline-HCl was applied for 30secs. In conclusion, the 50mg/ml Tetracycline-HCl must not be applied for the RBM surface implant for surface treatment.
Keywords
tetracycline-HCi; REM implant surface; surface roughness;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Branemark P-I. Introduction to osseointegration. In: Branemark P-I Zarb G, Albreksson T(eds). Tissue integrated prostheses: Osseointegration m clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence book. 1995:11-76
2 Albrektsson T, Isidor F, Consensus report of session IV. In: Lang NP & Karring T. eds. Proceeding of the 1st European Workshop on Periodontology, London: Quintessence Books, 1994;365-369.
3 Roos-Jansaker AM, Renvert S, Egelberg J. Treatment of peri-implant infections: A literature review. J Clin Periodontal 2003;6:467-485
4 Zablotsky MH, Diedrich DL, Meffert RM. Detoxification of endotoxin contaminated titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated surfaces utilizing various chemotherapeutic and mechanical modalities, Implant Dent 1992: 2: 154-158
5 Dortbudak O. Haas R, Bernhart T. Mailath-Pokorny G. Lethal photo-sensitization for decontamination of implant surfaces in the treatment of peri-rimplamitis Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 2: 104-108
6 Schou S, Rergludh T. Lang NP. Surgical treatment of peri-implants, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19:110-149
7 Hurzeler MB. Quinones CR, Schupbach P, Morrison EC, Caffesse RG. Treatment of peri-implantitis using guided bone regeneration and bone grafts, alone or in combination, in beagle dogs. Part II: Histologic finding. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997:12:168-175
8 Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, et al, Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants, A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;7:889-902
9 Binon PP, Implants and components: entering the new millennium. lnt J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000; 15: 76-94
10 Wong M, Eulenberger J, Schenk R, Hunziker E. Effect of surface topology on the osseointegration of implant materials in trabecular bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29;1567-1575   DOI
11 Persson LG, Ericsson I, Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Guided bone regeneration in the treatment of periimplantitis and replacement of implant components, An experimental study in the dog. J Clin Periodontal 2001;28: 258-263   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Nancy EM et al. Complaications of Dental Implants: Identification, Frequency & Associated Risk Factors, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:848-855
13 Behneke A. Behneke N, d'Hoedt B, Treatment of peri-implantitis defects with autogenous bone grafts: Six-month to 3-year results of a prospective study in 17 patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 2000:15: 125-138
14 Quirynen M, Naert I, Van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Branemark system, Clin Oral Implants Res 1992;3:104-111   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Andrea Mombelli, Microbiology & Antimicrobial therapy of peri-implantitis, Periodontology 2000 2002;28:177-189   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Meffert RM, Langer B, Fritz ME. Dental implants: A review. J Periodontal 1992:63: 859-870   DOI
17 R. M. Meffert Periodontitis vs, Peri-implantitis: The same disease? The same treatment Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1996;7:278-291   DOI
18 Esposito M. Hirsch J. Lekholm U. Thomsen P, Differential diagnosis and treatment strategies for biologic complications and failing oral implants: A review of the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;4:473-490
19 Krozer A, Hall J, Ericsson I. Chemical treatment of machined titanium surfaces An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;3: 201-211
20 Albrektsson T. Dahle E. Enbom L. Osseointegrated oral implant, A Swedish multicenter study of 8, 139 Consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J Periodontol, 1988:59:287-296   DOI   PUBMED
21 Rimondini L, Fare S, Brambilla E, et al, The effect of surface roughness on early in vivo plaque colonization on titanium, J Periodontal 1997;6:556-62
22 Mombelli A, Van Oosten MAC. Schurch EJ, Lang NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbial Immunol 1987:2:115-151
23 Mayer TM, Hawley CE, Gunsolley JC, Feldman S. The single tooth implant: A viable alternative for single tooth replacement. J Periodontol 2002:73:687-693   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Dennison DK Huerzeler MB, Quinones C, Caffesse RG. Contaminated implant surfaces: An in vitro comparison of implant surface coating and treatment modalities for decontamination, J Periodontol 1994;10: 942-948
25 Thomson-Neal D, Evans GH, Meffert RM. Effects of various prophylactic treatments on titanium, sapphire. and hydroxyapatite-coated implants: All SEM study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1989: 4: 300-311
26 Persson LG, Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Sennerby L. Re-osseointegration after treatment of peri-implantitis at different implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog, Clin Oral Implants Res 2001:6: 595-603
27 Trisi P, Marcato C. Todisco M. Bone-to-implant apposition with machined and MTX microtextured implant surfaces in human sinus wafts, Int J Periodonitcs Restorative Dent 2003;28:427-437
28 Albrektsson TO, Johansson CB, Senncrby L, Biological aspects of implant dentistry: Osseointegration, Periodontol 2000 1994;4: 58-73   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL. Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible, J Biomed Mater Res 1998:1:1-11   DOI
30 Isidor F. Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1996;7:143-152   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Krozor A, Hall J, Ericsson I. Chemical treatment of machined titanium surfaces All in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;3:204-211
32 Somerrnan MJ, Foster RA.. Vorsteg GM, Progebin K Wynn RL. Effects of minocycline all fibroblast attachment and spreading. J Periodontal Res 1988:2:154-159
33 Hurzeler MB. Quinones CR, Morrison EC, Caffesse RG, Treatment of peri-implantitis using guided bone regeneration and bone grafts, alone or in combination, in beagle dogs. Part 1: Clinical findings and histologic observations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;4:474-484
34 Hickey JS, O'Neal RB, Scheidt MJ, et al, Microbiologic characterization of ligature induced peri -implantitis in the microswine model. J Periodontal 1991;62:518-55:3
35 Jovanovic SA. Kenney EB, Carranza EA. Donath K. The regenerative potential of plaque induced peri-implant bone defects treated by a submerged membrane technique: An experimental study, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993:8:13-18   PUBMED
36 Mombelli A, Lang NP. The diagnosis and treatment of peri-implantitis. Periodontal 2000 1998:17:63-76   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Wittrig EE, Zablotsky MH, Layman RM, Fibroblastic growth and attachment on hydroxyapatite-coated titanium surface following the use of various detoxification modalities: Part I, Non-contaminated hydroxyapatite, Implant Dent 1992:1:189-194   DOI
38 Chairay JP, Boulekbache H, Jean A, Sayer A, Bouchard P, Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of the effect of an air-abrasive system on dental implants: A comparative in vitro study between machined and plasma-sprayed titanium surfaces. J Periodontol 1997:68: 1215-1222   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
39 Baron M, Haas R, Dortbudak O, Watzek G. Experimentally induced peri-rimplantitis: A review of different. treatment methods described in the literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000:4:533-44
40 Meffert RM, How to treat ailing and failing implants. Implant Dent 1992;1:25-33   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn