Browse > Article

A Retrospective study of the type of patients, the distribution of implant and the survival rate of $Xive^{(R)}$ implant  

Myung, Woo-Chun (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Lee, Jung-Seok (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Chae, Gyung-Joon (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Jung, Ui-Won (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Kim, Chang-Sung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Cho, Kyoo-Sung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Chai, Jung-Kiu (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Kim, Chong-Kwan (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Choi, Seong-Ho (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science / v.37, no.3, 2007 , pp. 523-534 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study is an analysis of types of patients and distribution of implant site and survival rate of $Xive^{(R)}$ implant. The following results on patient type, implant distribution and survival rate were compiled from 324 implant cases of 140 patients treated at the periodontal dept. of Yonsei University Hospital and G dental clinic between February 2003 and April 2006. 1. There are no dissimilarities between men and women, with patients in their 30, 40, 50s accounting for 80% of patients and accounted for 82% of implant treatments; the largest share of patients and implant treatments. 2. Mn, posterior area. accounted for 57% of implant treatments followed by Mx. posterior area(29%), Mx, anterior area(8%) and Mn, anterior area(6%). 3. Partial edentulous patients treated by single crown and bridge-type prosthesis accounted for 96% and fully edentulous patient accounted for the remaining 4%. 4. The major cause of tooth loss is periodontal disease, followed by dental canes, trauma and congenital missing. 5, The distribution of bone quality for maxillae was 54,2% for type III, followed by 30.8% for type II, 15% for type IV and 0% for type I. As for mandible, the distribution was 63% for type II, followed by 34% for type III, 2,5% for type I and 0,5% for type IV. 6. The distribution of bone quantity for maxillae was 55% for type C, followed by 35% for type B, 8% for type D and 2% for type A. As for mandible, the distribution was 60% for type B, followed by 32% for type C, 7% for type A and 0% for type D. 7. The majority of implants were those of 9.5-13 mm in length(95%) and regular diameter in width(82%). 8. The total survival rate was 98%. The survival rate was 97% in the maxillae region and 99% in the mandible region. 9. The survival rate in type I was 83%, in type II was 99%, in type III was 97% and in type IV was 100%. As for the bone quantity, the survival rate in type A and D(100%) was most, followed by type B(99%) and type C(96%). The results showed that $Xive^{(R)}$ implant could be used satisfactorily compare for the other implant system. But we most to approach carefully in certain extreme condition especially with poor bone quality and quantity.
Keywords
$Xive^{(R)}$ implant; Patient type; Implant distribution; Survival rate;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 6  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Branemark PI, Brein U, Johansson B. et al, Regeneration of bone marrow. A clinical and experimental study following removal of bone marrow by curettage, Acta. Anat 1964;59: 1-46   DOI
2 Ericsson I, Nilson H, Lindh T, Nilner K, Randow K. Imediato functional loading of Branemark single tooth implants, An 18 months' clinical pilot follow-up study, clin, oral Impl, res 2000:110:26-33
3 Lekholm U, Zarb G, Branemark PI, Tissue integrated prostheses Osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago. Quintensence 1985;199-209
4 Stephen W, Use of the Frialit-2 Implant system in Private Practice: A Clinical report, lnt J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 4:552-555
5 Atwood DA, Postextraction changes in the adult mandible as illustrated by micro-radiographs of midsagital sections and serial cephalometric roentgenograms, J pros-thet Dent 1963;13:810-824   DOI
6 Branemark PI, Brein U, Adell R, Hansson B, -O, Ohlsson A, Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses, I, Experimental studies. Scandinavian Jounal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 1969;3:81-100   DOI
7 장인권, 정의원, 김창성 등. 하악에 식립된 Xive implant 환자의 분포 및 식립부 유형과 생존율. 대한치주과학회지 2005;35:437-448
8 유호선, 소성수, 한동후, 조규성, 문익상. 하악대구치부위의 고정성 보철물에서 2개의 장폭경과 3개의 표준 임플란트의 비교. 대한치주과학회지 2002:32:577-587
9 Gomez-Roman G, Kruppenbacher M, Weber H, Schulte W. immediate Postextraction Implant Placement with Root-Analog Stepped Implants: surgical procedure and Statistical outcome After 6 Years, Int J Oral Maxillofac implants 2001:4:503-513
10 Henny PH, Laney W,R. Jemt T, Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement: a prospective 5 years multicenter study. lnt J Oral Maxillofac Implant 1996; 11: 450-455
11 홍성재, 백정원, 김창성 등. 임플란트 환자의 유형 및 분포에 대한 연구. 대한치주과학회지 2002: 32: 539-554
12 박지은, 윤정호, 정의원 등. 임플란트 환자의 분포 및 식립부 유형. 대한치주과학회지 2004;34:819-836
13 Lekholm U, Gunne J, Henry P, at al Survival of the Branemark Implant in Partially Edentulous Jaws:A 10-Year Prospective Multicenter Study, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999:14:639-645   PUBMED
14 Collaert B, De Bruyn H. Comparison of Branemark fixture intergration and shortterm survival using one-stage or twostage surgery in completely and partially edentulous mandible S, Clin oral Impl Res 1998;9:131 -135   DOI   ScienceOn
15 D, Buser, U Brugger, N.D.Lang, S. Nyman, Regeneration and enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue regeneration, Clin Oral Impl Res 1990;1:22-32   DOI   ScienceOn
16 채경준, 정의원, 김창성 등. 상악에 식립된 Frialit-2 임플란트의 성공률에 대한 후향적 연구. 대한치주과학회지 2005;35:449-459
17 Schnitman, Ten-year results for Branemark implants immediately loaded with fixed prosthesis implant placement, Int .J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:495-503
18 Degidi M, Piattelli A, Comparative analysis study of 702 dental implants subjected to immediate nonfunctional loading to traditional healing periods with a follow-up of up to 24 months, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005:20:99-107
19 Degidi M. Piattelli A. Parallel Screw Cylinder Implants: Comparative Analysis Between Immediate Loading and Two-Stage Healing of 1005 Dental Implants with a 2-Year Follow Up. Clinical Implant dentistry and Related Research, 2006:8: 151-160   DOI   ScienceOn
20 이항빈, 백정원, 김창성 등. 하악 제 1,2 대구치를 대체하는 단일 임플란트 간의 성공률 비교. 대한치주과학회지 2004;34: 101-111