Browse > Article

The effect of early membrane exposure on exophytic bone formation using perforated titanium membrane  

Kim, Eun-Jung (Department of Periodontology and Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Herr, Yeek (Department of Periodontology and Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Kwon, Young-Hyuk (Department of Periodontology and Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Park, Joon-Bong (Department of Periodontology and Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Chung, Jong-Hyuk (Department of Periodontology and Institute of Oral Biology, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
Publication Information
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science / v.37, no.2, 2007 , pp. 237-249 More about this Journal
Abstract
This study was performed to evaluate the effect of membrane exposure on new bone formation when guided bone regeneration with perforated titanium membrane on atrophic alveolar ridge. The present study attempted to establish a GBR model for four adult beagle dog premolar. Intra-marrow penetration defects were created on the alveolar ridge(twelve weeks after extraction) on the mandibular premolar teeth in the beagle dogs. Space providing perforated titanium membrane with various graft material were implanted to provide for GBR. The graft material were demineralized bovine bone(DBB), Irradiated cancellous bone(ICB) and demineralized human bone powder(DFDB). The gingival flap were advanced to cover the membranes and sutured. Seven sites experienced wound failure within 2-3weeks postsurgery resulting in membrane exposure. The animals were euthanized at 4 weeks postsurgery for histologic and histometric analysis. The results of this study were as follows: 1. There was little new bone formation at 4 weeks postsurgery. irrespectively of membrane exposure. 2. There was significant relationship between membrane exposure and bone graft resorption(P<0.05), but no relation between membrane exposure and infiltrated connective tissue. 3. There was much bone graft resorption on DFDB than ICB and DBB. 4. The less exposure was on the perforated titanium membrane, the more dense infiltrated connective tissue was filled under the membrane when grafted with ICB and DBB. but there was no relationship between the rate of membrane exposure and the percentage of infiltrated connective tissue area and no relationship between the percentage of the area in the infiltrated connective tissue and in the residual bone graft. Within the above results, bone formation may be inhibited when membrane was exposed and ICB and DBB were more effective than DFDB as a bone graft material when guided bone regeneration.
Keywords
Exophytic bone formation; Membrane exposure; Graft material;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Dahlin C, Sennerby L, Lekholm U. Generation of new bone around titanium implants using a membrane technique: An experimental study in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:19-25   PUBMED
2 Ofter M, Sandu P, Zvi A. Healing of dehiscence-type defects in implants placed together with different barrier membranes: A comparative clinical study. Clin Oral Impl Res 2005;16:210-219   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Zitzmann NU, Naef R, Scharer P. Resorbable versus nonresorbable membranes in combination with Bio-Oss for guided bone regeneration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:844-852
4 Simion M, Baldoni M, Zaffe D. Jaw bone enlargement using immediate implant placement associated with a split-crest technique and guided tissue regeneration. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1992;12:462-473
5 Perikls P, Jaime L, Alejandro K. The use of titanium mesh in conjunction with autogenous bone graft and inorganic bovine bone mineral for localized alveolar ridge augmentation: A human study. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 2003;23:185-195
6 von Arx T, Hardt N, Wallkamm B. The TIME technique: A new method for localized alveolar ridge augmentation prior to placement of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:387-394
7 von Arx T, Kurt B. Implant placement and simultaneous ridge augmentation using autogenous bone and a micro titanium mesh: A prospective clinical study with 20 implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 1999;10:24-33   DOI   ScienceOn
8 van Steenberghe D, Johansson C, Quirynen M, Molly L, Albrektsson T. Bone augmentation by means of a stiff occlusive titanium barrier: A study in rabbits and humans. Clin Oral Impl Res 2003;14:63-71   DOI   ScienceOn
9 von Arx T, Cochran DL, Hermann JS, Schenk RK, Buser D. Lateral ridge augmentation using different bone fillers and barrier membrane application: A histologic and histometric pilot study in the mandible. Clin Oral Impl Res 2001;12:260-269   DOI
10 Nowzari H, Martin F, Slots J. Periodontal pathogens on polytetrafluoroethylene membrane for guided tissue regeneration inhibit healing. J. Clin Periodontol 1995;22:469-474   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Simion M, Tristi P, Piattelli A Vertical ridge augmentation using a membrane technique associated with osseointegrated implants. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1994; 14:167-180
12 Widmark G, Andersson B, Ivanof CJ. Mandibular bone graft in the anterior maxilla for single tooth implants: Presentation of a surgical method. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;26:106-109
13 De Sanctis M, Zucchelli G, Clauser C. Bacterial colonization of bioabsorbable barrier material and periodontal regeneration. J Periodontol 1996;67:1193-1200   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
14 Lekovic V, Kenney EB, Kovacevic K, Carranza FA Jr. Evaluation of guided tissue regeneration in class II furcation defects: A clinical re-entry study. J Periodontol 1989;60:694-698   DOI   PUBMED
15 Augthun M, Yildrium M, Spiekermann H, Biesterfeld S. Healing of bone defects in combination with immediate implants using the membrane technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:421-428
16 Mattout P, Mattout C. Conditions for success in guided tissue regeneration: Retrospective study on 376 implant site. J Periodontol 2000;71:1904-1909   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Simion M, Baldoni M, Rossi P, Zaffe D. A comparative study of the effectiveness of e-PTFE membranes with and without early exposure during the healing period. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1994;14:167-180
18 Boyne PJ, Cole MD, Stringer D, Shafqat JP. A technique for osseous restoration of deficient edentulous maxillary ridge. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1985;43:87-91   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Zucchelli G, De Sanctis M, Clauser C. Integrated connective tissue in bioabsorbable barrier membrane and periodontal regeneration. J Periodontol 1997;68: 996-1004   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
20 Martin L, Christof P, Evaluation of implants placed with barrier membranes: A retrospective follow-up study up to five years. Clin Oral Impl Res 2002;13:274-280   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Lazzara RJ. Immediate implant placement into extraction sites: Surgical and restorative advantages. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1989;9:333-343
22 Lorenzoni M, Pertl C, Polansky RA. Evaluation of implants placed with barrier membranes. Clin Oral Impl Res 2002;13: 274-280   DOI   ScienceOn
23 De Sanctis M, Zucchelli G, Clauser C. Bacterial colonization of barrier material and periodontal regeneration. J Periodontol 1996; 23: 1039-1046   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Kohal RJ, Mellas P, Hurzeler ME, et al, The effect of guided bone regeneration and grafting on implants placed into immediate extraction socket: An experimental study in dogs. J Periodontol 1998;69:927-937   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
25 Selvig KA, Kersten BG, Chamberlain AD. Regenerative surgery of intrabony periodontal defects using e-PTFE membranes: Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of retrieved membranes vs, clinical healing. J Periodontol 2002;63:974-978   DOI
26 Carlo T, Stefano PB. Treatment of peri-implant defects with the vertical ridge augmentation procedure: A patient report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:572-577
27 Marco D, Antonio S, Adriano P. Regeneration of the alveolar crest using titanium micromesh with autologous bone and a resorbable membrane. J of Oral Implantology 2003;2:86-90
28 Gher ME, Quintero G, Assad D, Monaco E. Bone grafting and guided bone regeneration for immediate dental implants in humans. J Periodontol 1994; 65: 881-891   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
29 Becker W, Becker BE, Berg L, Prichard J. New attachment after treatment with root isolation procedure: Report for treated class II furcation with vertical osseous defects. lnt J Periodont Rest Dent 1988;8: 9-21
30 Buser D, Dura K, Belser UC, Hirt HP, Berthold H. Localized ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration: Surgical procedure in the maxilla. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1993;13:29-45
31 Schenk RK. Bone regeneration: Biologic bias. Guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence 49-100
32 Scantlebury TV. A decade of technology development for guided tissue regeneration. J Periodontol 1993; 64: 1129-1137   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
33 von Arx T, Hardt N, Wallkamm B. Localized ridge augmentation using a micro-titanium mesh: A report on 27 implants followed from 1 to 3 years after functional loading. Clin Oral Impl Res 1998;9:123-130   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Yukna RA. Clinical human comparison of e-PTFE barrier membrane and freeze-dried dura mater allografts for guided tissue regeneration of lost periodontal support I: Mandibular class II furcations. J Periodontol 1992;63:431-442   DOI   PUBMED
35 Yoshinari N, Tohya T, Mori A. Inflammatory cell population and bacterial contamination of membranes used for guided tissue regenerative procedure. J Periodontol 1998;69:460-469   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
36 Jovanovic SA, Spiekermann H, Richter EJ. Bone regeneration around titanium dental implants in dehiscenced defect sites: A clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:233-245
37 Malchiodi N, Scarano A, Quaranta M, Piattelli A. Rigid fixation by means of titanium mesh in edentulous ridge expansion for horizontal ridge augmentation in the maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:701-705
38 Machtei EE. The effect of membrane exposure on the outcome of regenerative procedures in humans: A meta-analysis. J Periodontol 2001; 72: 512-516   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Nowzari H, Slots J. Microbiologic and clinical study of polytetrafluoroethylene membranes for guided bone regeneration around implants, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:67-73
40 Becker W, Dahlin C, Becker BE. The use of e-PTFE barrier membranes for bone promotion around titanium implants placed into extraction socket: A prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;14:48-61