Browse > Article

Radiographic evaluation of alveolar bone profile of maxillary anterior teeth in Korean young adult  

Seo, Hyo-Seok (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dan-Kook University)
Chung, Chin-Hyung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dan-Kook University)
Lim, Sung-Bin (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dan-Kook University)
Hong, Ki-Seok (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Dan-Kook University)
Publication Information
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science / v.36, no.2, 2006 , pp. 461-471 More about this Journal
Abstract
In order to achieve a satisfactory esthetic result of periodontal surgery or implant in maxillary anterior area, periodontists must be aware of normal alveolar bone anatomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship of alveolar bone morphology to tooth shape and form. 78(mean age : 25 yrs) periodontally healthy volunteers participated in this study. Two maxillary central incisor and one lateral incisor were selected to study. With minimal local anesthesia, gutta-percha cone inserted to labial gingival sulcus of selected teeth just after bone sounding with periodontal probe. Metal ball (4mm diameter) attached to palatal fossa of central incisor. Then, periapical radiograph was taken according to long cone paralleling technique. After film scan, labial alveolar bone profile reproduced along interproximal bone and apical ends of gutta-percha cones on computer screen. By utilizing computer program, the distance from height of interproximal bone to the labial bone crest in central incisor-central incisor and central incisor-lateral incisor area was measured and converted to real distance by using vertical length of metal ball on film. After measuring crown length & width of central incisor, the 10 individuals ranked lowest GW/L ratio (crown width/length ratio) and the 10 ranked highest were selected as having a long-narrow(group N), or a short-wide(group W) form of the central incisors. Means of the distance from height of interproximal bone to the labial bone crest of group N, W were calculated and compared by means of independent t-test. The results were as follows: 1. Mean distance from the height of the interproximal bone to the labial bone crest was $3.5{\pm}0.7mm$ between two central incisor, and $2.8{\pm}0.6mm$ between central and lateral incisor. 2. Mean GW/L ratio of group N was 0.57, and group W was 0.8. Mean distance from the height of the interproximal bone to the labial bone crest of group N was higher than group W in both measured area(measurements of group N, W were $3.9{\pm0.2mm$ and $3.5{\pm}0.2mm$ between two central incisor, $3.0{\pm}0.2mm$ and $2.8{\pm}0.2mm$ between central and lateral incisor), but there were no statistically significant differences when the groups were compared. Within the limits of the present study, there was a tendency that subjects with long-narrow teeth have more scalloped alveolar bone profile than subjects with short-wide teeth in upper anterior area, but no statistically significant differences were found.
Keywords
alveolar bone profile; interproximal bone; maxillary anterior teeth;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Kois J : Altering gingival levels: The restorative connection. Part 1: Biologic variables. J Esthet Dent 6: 3-9, 1994   DOI
2 Spear FM : Restorative considerations in combined orthodontic implant therapy. Orthodontic applications of osseointegrated implants, Quintessence: 121-132, 2000
3 Salama H, Salama MA, Li T, Garber DA, Adar P : Treatment planning 2000: an esthetically oriented revision on the original implant protocol. J Fsthet Dent 9: 55-67, 1997   DOI
4 Tarnow DP, Eskow RN : Preservation of implant esthetics: soft tissue and restorative considerations. J Esthet Dent 8: 12-19, 1996   DOI
5 Salama H, Salama M : The role of orthodontic extrusive remodeling in the enhancement of soft and hard tissue profiles prior to implant placement: a systematic approach to the management of extraction site defects. Int J Perio Resto Dent 13: 313-333, 1993
6 정민영, 임성빈, 정진형 : 상악 전치부 치은선의 평균치에 관한 연구. 대한치주과학회지 34: 19-28, 2004
7 Volchansky A, Cleaton-Jones P : Clinical crown height(length)-a review of published measurements. J Clin Periodontol 28: 1085-1090, 2001   DOI
8 Wilson TG Jr, Buser D : Advances in the use of guided tissue regeneration for localized ridge augmentation in combination with dental implants. Tex Dent J 17: 140-149, 1997
9 Saadoun AP, Landsberg CJ : Classifications and times sequence of different approaches to implant insertion after tooth extraction. Pract Periodont Rest Dent 8: 933-944, 1997
10 Culpepper WD, Mitchel PS, Blass MS : Anesthetic factors in anterior tooth restorations. J Prosthet Dent 30: 576-582, 1973
11 O'Connor TW, Biggs N : Interproximal craters. J Periodontol 35: 46-57, 1964
12 Ochsenbein C, Ross S : A reevaluation of osseous surgery. In: Dental Clinics of North America, WB Saunders Co: 87-102, 1969
13 Mathews TG : The anatomy of a smile. J Prosthet Dent 39: 128-134, 1978   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Olsson M, Lindhe J : Periodontal characteristics in individuals with varying form of the upper central incisiors. J Clin Periodontol 18: 78-82, 1991   DOI
15 Misch CM : The extracted tooth pontic-provisional replacement during bone graft and implant healing. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 10: 711-718, 1998
16 Newman HN : Attrition, eruption, and the periodontium. J Dent Res 78: 730-734, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Smukler H, Castellucci F, Capri D : The role of the implant housing in obtaining aesthetics: Generation of peri-implant gingivae and papillae-Part 1. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 15: 141-149, 2003
18 Salama H, Salama MA, Garber DA, Adar P : Developing optimal peri-implant papillae within the esthetic zone: guided soft tissue augmentation. J Esthet Dent 7: 125-129, 1995   DOI
19 Tarnow DP : Considerations for single-unit esthetic implant restorations. Compendium Cant Educ Dent 16: 778-788, 1995
20 Meyenberg KH, Imoberdorf MJ : The aesthetic challenges of single tooth replacement: a comparison of treatment alternatives. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 9: 727-735, 1997
21 M ller HP, Eger T : Masticatory mucosa and periodontal phenotype : A review. Int J Perio Rest Dent 22: 172-183, 2002
22 Saadoun AP, LeGall M, Touati B : Selection and ideal tridimensional implant position for soft tissue aesthetics. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 11: 1063-1072, 1999
23 M ller HP, Heinecke A, Schaller N, Eger T : Masticatory mucosa in subjects with different periodontal phenotypes. J Clin Periodontol 27: 621-626, 2000   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Olsson M, Lindhe J, Marinello CP : On the relationship between crown form and clinical features of the gingiva in adolescents. J Clin Periodontol 20: 570-577, 1993   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Chiche GJ, Pinault A : Smile rejuvenation: a methodic approach. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 5: 37-44, 1993
26 Smith BGN, Knight JK : An index for measuring the wear of teeth. Brit Dent J 156: 435-438, 1984   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Weisgold A : Contours of the full crown resotration. Alpha Omegan 70: 77-89, 1977
28 Spear FM : Maintenance of the interdental papilla following anterior tooth removal. Pract Periodont Aeshet Dent 11: 21-28, 1999
29 Landsberg CJ, Bichacho N : A modified surgical/prosthetic approach for optimal single implant supported crown. part I - the socket seal surgery. Pract Periodont Aesthet Dent 6: 11-17. 1994
30 Hirschfield I : A study of skulls in the American Museum of Natural History in relation to periodontal disease. J Dent Res 5: 251-265, 1923
31 Becker W, Ochsenbein C, Tibbetts L, Becker BE : Alveolar bone anatomic profiles as measured from dry skulls. J Clin Periodontol 24: 727-731, 1997   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Landsberg CJ : Socket seal surgery combined with immediate implant placement: A novel approach for single-tooth replacement. 17: 140-149, 1997
33 Sterrett JD, Oliver T, Robinson F, Fortson W, Knaak B, Russell CM : Width/length ratios of normal clinical crowns of the maxillary anterior dentition in man. J Clin Periodontol 26: 153-157, 1999   DOI   ScienceOn