Histological response of anodized titanium implant
![]() |
Lim, Svetlana
(Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
Heo, Seong-Joo (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) Han, Chong-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University, Yongdong Severance Hospital) Kim, Tae-II (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) Seo, Yang-Jo (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) Ku, Young (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) Chung, Kyoung-Uk (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) Chung, Chong-Pyoung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) Han, Soo-Boo (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) Rhyu, In-Chul (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) |
1 | Parr GR. Gardner LK, Toth RW. Titanium: The mystery metal of implant dentistry. Dental materials aspects. The journal of prosthetic dentistry. 1985:54(3): 410-414 DOI ScienceOn |
2 | Larsson C. Thomsen P, Aronsson BO, Rodahl M, Lausmaa J, Kasemo B, Ericson LE. Bone response to surface-modified titanium response to machined and electropolished implants with different oxide thicknesses. Biomaterials 1996: 17(6): 605-615 DOI ScienceOn |
3 | Moberg LE. Kondell PA. Sagulin GB, Bolin A. Heimdahl A. Gynther GW. Branemark System and ITI Dental Implant System for treatment of mandibular edentulism. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2001: 12: 450-461. DOI ScienceOn |
4 | Klokkevold PR. Nishimura RD, Adachi M, Caputo A. Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997: 8: 442-447 DOI ScienceOn |
5 | Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: A histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998: 40: 1-11 DOI ScienceOn |
6 | Li D. Ferguson SJ, Beutler T, Cochran DL, Sittig C, Hirt HP, Buser D. Biomechanical comparison of the sandblasted and acid-etched and the machined and acid-etched titanium surface for dental implants. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002; 60: 325-332 DOI ScienceOn |
7 | Ericsson I, Johansson CB, Bystedt H, Norton MR. A histomorphometric evaluation of bone-to-implant contact on machine-prepared and roughened titanium dentalimplants. Clin Oral Impl Res 1994; 5: 202-206 DOI ScienceOn |
8 | Glauser R, Portmann M, Ruhstaller P, Lundgren AK. Hammerle C. Gottlow J. Stability measurements of immediately loaded machined and oxidized implants in the posterior maxillal A comparative clinical study using resonance frequency analysis). Applied Osseointegration Research. 2001: 2(1): 27-29 |
9 | Son WW, Zhu XL, Shin HI. Ong JL, Kim KH. In vivo histological response to anodized and anodized /hydrothermally treated titanium implants. J Biomed Mater Res Part B; 2003; Appl Biomater 66B: 520-525 |
10 | Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Linghe J. Anchorage of titanium implants with different surface characteristics: An experimental study in rabbits. Clin Impl Dent and Relat Res 2000; 2(3): 120-128 DOI ScienceOn |
11 | Li DH, Liu BL, Zou JC, Xu KW. Improvement of osseointegration of titanium dental implants by a modified sandblasting surface treatment: An in vivo interfacial biomechanics study. Implant Dent 1999:8: 289-294 DOI PUBMED ScienceOn |
12 |
Mustafa K, Wroblewski J, Hultenby K, Silva Lopez B, Arvidson K. Effects of titanium surfaces blasted with |
13 | Davies JE. Machanisms of endosseous integtation. Int J Prosthodont 1998: 11: 391-401 PUBMED |
14 | Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL, Hoffmann B, Lussi A. Steinemann SG. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 2004; 87(3) :529-533 |
15 | Olsson M, Urde G, Andersen JB, Sennerby L. Early loading of maxillary fixed cross-arch dental prostheses supported by six or eight oxidized titanium implants: Results after 1 year of loading, case series. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2003: 5(1) Suppl: 81-87 DOI ScienceOn |
16 |
Ivanoff CJ, Hallgren C, Widmark G, Sennerby L, Wennerberg A. Histologic evaluation of the bone integration of |
17 | Liang B, Fujibayashi S, Neo M, Taumra J, Kim HM, Uchida M, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Hisological and mechanical investigation of the bone-bonding ability of anodically oxidized titanium in rabbits. Biomaterials 2003: 24: 4959-4966 DOI ScienceOn |
18 | Glauser R, Lundgren AK, Gottlow J, Sennerby L, Portmann M, Ruhstaller P, Hammerle C. Immediate occlusal loading of Branemark TiUnite implants placed predominantly in soft bone: 1-year results of a prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2003: 5 (1) Suppl: 47-56 PUBMED |
19 | Rocci A. Martignoni M, Sennerby L. Gottlow J. Immediate loading of a Branemark System implant with the TiUnite surface. Histological evaluation after 9 months. Applied Osseointegration Research 2002: 3(1): 25-28 |
20 | Salata L. Rasmusson L, Novaes A. Papalexiou V, Sennerby L. The influence of anodic oxidation on implant integration and stability in bone defects. An RFA study in the dog mandible. Applied Osseointegration Research 2002: 3(1): 32-34 |
21 | Sykaras N, Lacopino AM, Marker VA. Triplett RG, Woody RD. Implant materials, designs, and surface topographies: their effect on osseointegration. A literature review. Int J Maxillofac Implants 2000; 15: 675-690 |
22 | Letic-Gavrilovic A. Scandurra R. Abe K. Genetic potential of interfacial guided osteogenesis in implant devices. Dental Materials Journal. 2000: 19(2): 99-132 DOI PUBMED ScienceOn |
23 | Giavaresi G, Fini M. Cigada A. Chiesa R. Rondelli G, Rimondini L, Torricelli P, Aldini NN, Giardino R. Mechanical and histomorphometric evaluations of titanium implants with different surface treatments inserted in sheep cortical bone. Biomaterials 2003: 24: 1583-1594 DOI ScienceOn |
24 | Degidi M, Petrone G, Iezzi G. Piattelli A. Histologic evaluation of a human immediately loaded titanium implant with a porous anodized surface. Clin Impl Dent Relat Res 2002: 4(2): 110-114 DOI ScienceOn |
25 | Glauser R, Gottlow J. Lundgren AK, Sennerby L, Portmann M, Ruhstaller P. Hammerle C. Immediate occlusal loading of Branemark Mk IV TiUnite implant placed in bone quality type 4. Applied Osseointegration Research 2002: 3(1): 22-24 |
26 |
Onur MA. Cehreli MC, Tas Z, Sahin S. Effect of machined/turned, |
27 | Friberg B. Billstrom C. Preliminary results of a prospective multicenter clinical study on TiUnite implants. Applied Osseointegration Research 2002: 3(1): 29-31 |
28 | Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, Roser K. Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Oxidized implants and their influence on the bone response. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine. 2001; 12: 1025-1031 DOI ScienceOn |
29 | Sul YT, Johansson CB, Kang Y, Jeon DG, Albrektsson T. Bone reactions to oxidized titanium implants with electrochemical anion sulphuric acid and phosphoric acid incorporation. Clin Impl Dent Relat Res 2002: 4(2): 78-87 DOI ScienceOn |
30 | Ivanoff CJ. Widmark G. Johansson C, Wennerberg A. Histologic evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titanium micro-implants in human jawbone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003: 18: 341-348 |
31 | Sul YT. The significance of the surface properties of oxidized titanium to the bone response: special emphasis on potential biochemical bonding of oxidized titanium implant. Biomaterials 2003; 24: 3893-3907 DOI PUBMED ScienceOn |
32 | Rocci A. Martignoni M, Burgos PM, Gottlow J, Sennerby L. Histology of retrieved immediately and early loaded oxidized implants: light microscopic observations after 5 to 9 months of loading in the posterior mandible. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 2003; 5(Suppl 1): 88-98 DOI ScienceOn |
![]() |