Browse > Article

Effect of deproteinized bovine bone mineral on cell proliferation in the procedure of guided bone regeneration  

In, Young-Mi (Department of Periodontology, Kyung Hee University)
Kwon, Young-Hyuk (Department of Periodontology, Kyung Hee University)
Park, Joon-Bong (Department of Periodontology, Kyung Hee University)
Herr, Yeek (Department of Periodontology, Kyung Hee University)
Publication Information
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science / v.34, no.3, 2004 , pp. 683-698 More about this Journal
Abstract
One of the bone substitutes now in routine use, deproteinized bovine bone mineral(DBBM), is regarded as resorbable and osteoconductive, but some studies refute this. The present study was performed to evaluate the effects of DBBM on guided bone regeneration using titanium membrane on the calvaria of rabbit. At 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks after surgery, the animal was scrificed. Non-decalcified specimens were produced for histologic analysis. The results of this study were as follows : 1. Titanium membrane was biocompatible and capable of space-maintaining, but there was ingrowth of soft tissue through the pore of titanium membrane. 2. There was no resorption or reduction of DBBM with time. 3. Some of the DBBM particles were combined with newly formed bone. But, apart from host bone, a great part of the particles were surrounded by connective tissue. 4. The bone formation was slight vertically and restricted to superficial area of host bone. Whithin the above results, DBBM dose not appear to contribute to bone formation. DBBM may disturb the migration and proliferation of mesenchymal cell derived from host bone and increase the growth of connective tissue. Therefore, careful caution is needed on selection of bone graft material and surgical protocol at guided bone regeneration for implant placement.
Keywords
deproteinized borine bone mineral; GBR;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Bragger U, Hammerle CHF, Lang NP. Immediate transmucosal implants using the principle of guided tissue regenera- tion. II. A cross-sectional studty com- paring the clinical outcome 1 year after immediate to standard implant place- ment. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997;7:268- 276
2 Lang NP, Hammerle CHF, Bragger U, Lehmann B, Nyman SR. Guided tissue regeneration in jaw bone defects prior to implant placement. Clin Oral Impl Res 1994;5:92-97   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Lundgren AK. Lundgren D, Taylor A. Influence of barrier occlusiveness on guided bone augmentation. An experi- mental study in the rat. Clin Oral Impl Res 1998;9:251-260
4 Gross J. Bone grafting material for dental appli-cation: A practical guide. Compendium 1997;18:1013-1036
5 Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Healing around implants placed in bone defects treated with Bio-Oss. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997;8: 117-124   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Skoglund A, Hising P, Young C. A clinical and histologic examination in humans of the osseous response to implanted natural bone mineral. Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp 1997;12:194-199
7 Artzi Z, Tal H, Dayan D. Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets. Part 2. Histochemical observations at 9 months. J Periodon-tol 2001;72:152-159
8 Schmid J, Hammerle CHF, Fluckiger L, Gogolewski S, Winkler JR, Rahn B, Lang NP. Blood filled spaces with and without filler mate-rials in guided bone regeneration. A compara-tive experi- mental study in the rabbit using bioresorbable membranes. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997;875-81
9 Lekholm U, Ericsson I, Adell R, Slots J. The con-dition of the soft tissues at tooth and fixture abutments supporting fixed bridges. J Clin Periodontol 1986;13:558 -562   DOI   PUBMED
10 Reddi AH, Weintroub S, Muthukumaran N. Biologic principles of bone induction. Orthop Clin North Am 1987;18:207-212   PUBMED
11 Storgard-Jensen S, Aaboe M, Pinholt EM, Hjorting-Hansen E, Melsen F, Ruyter IE. Tissue reaction and material characteristics of four bone substitutes, Int J Oral Msxillofac Imp 1996;11:55-66
12 Schlegel AK, Donath K. Bio-$Oss^{\circledR}$ a resorbable bone substitute? J Long Term Effect Med Imp 1998;8:201-209
13 Spector M. Anorganic bovine bone and ceramic analogs of bone mineral as implants to facilitate bone regeneration. Clin Plastic Surg 1994;21:437-444
14 Fugazzotto PA. GBR using bovine bone matrix and resorbable and nonresorbable membrane. Part 1: Histologic results. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 2003;23: 361-369
15 von Arx T, Kurt B. Implant placement and simultaneous ridge augmentation using autoge-nous bone and a micro titanium mesh: a prospective clinical study with 20 implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 1999;10:24-33   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Dahlin C, Linde A, Gottlow J, Nyman S. Healing of bone defects by guided tissue regeneration. plastic Reconst Sur 1988;81:672-677   DOI   ScienceOn
17 von Arx T, Hardt N, Wallkamm B. The TIME technique: A new method for localized alveolar ridge augmentation prior to placement of dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;11:387-394
18 Young C, Sandstedt P, Skoglund A. A compara-tive study of anorganic xenogenic bone and autogenous bone implants for bone regenera-tion in rabbits. Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp 1999;1472-76
19 Schenk RK, Buser D, Hardwick WR, Dahlin C. Healing pattern of bone regeneration in mem-brane-protected defects: A histologic study in the canine mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp 1994;9:13-20
20 Jovanovic SA, Nevins M. Bone for- mation utiliz-ing titanium-reinforced barrier membranes. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1995;15:57-69
21 Rodan GA. Introduction to bone biology. Bone 1992;13(suppl 1):83-86
22 Jarch M. Calcium Phosphate ceramics as hard tissue prosthetics. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1982;157:259-278
23 Buser D, Bragger U, Land NP, Nyman S. Regeneration and enlargement of jaw bone using guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Impl Res 1990;1:22-32   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Pinholt EM, Bang G, Haanaes HR, Alveolar ridge augmentation in rats by Bio-Oss. Scan J Den Res 1991;99: 154-161
25 Burchardt H. The biology of bone graft repair. Clin Orthop Rel Res 1983;174: 28-42
26 Sandberg E, Dahlin C, Linde A. Bone regenera-tion by the osteopromotive technique using bioabsorbable mem- branes. An experimental study in rats. Int J Oral Mexillofac Surg 1993;51:1106 -1114   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Proussaefs P, Lozada J, Kleinman A, Rohrer MD, McMillan PJ. The use of titanium mesh in con-junction with autogenous bone graft and inor-ganic bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss) for loca-lized alveolar ridge augmentation: A human study. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 2003;23:185-195
28 Stavropoulos A, Kostopoulos L, Nyen- gaard, Karring T. Deproteinized bovine bone (Bio-Oss) and bioactive glass (Biogran) arrest bone forma-tion when used as an adjunct to guided tissue regeneration(GTR). An experimental study in the rat. J Clin Periodontol 2003;30:636-643   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the gen-esis and growth of tissues: Part II. The influence of rate and frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop 1989;239:263-285
30 Becker W, Becker B, Handelsman M, Ochsenbein C, Albrektsson T. Guided tissue regeneration for implant placed into extraction sockets: A study in dogs. J Petiodontol 1991;62:703-709   DOI
31 Boyne PJ. Restoration of osseous defects in max-illofacial casualties. J Am Dent Assoc 1969;78:767-776   DOI   PUBMED
32 Gongloff RK, Cole M, Whitlow W, Boyne JP. Titanium mesh and particulate cancellous bone and marrow grafts to augment the maxillary ridge. Int J Oral Mexillofac Surg 1986;15:263-268   DOI   ScienceOn
33 Artzi Z, Dayan D, Alpern Y, Nem- covsky CE. Vertical ridge augmentation using xenogenic material supported by a configured titanium mesh: clinicohi- stopathologic and histochemical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp 2003;18:440-446
34 Peetz M. Characterization of xenogenic bone material. In: Boyne PJ. Osseous reconstructon of the maxilla and the mandible: Surgical tech-niques using titanium mesh and bone mineral. 1st ed. Chicago, Berlin, London, Tokyo, Sao Paulo, Moscow, Prague and Warsaw: Quintessence Publishing Co.; 1997:87-100
35 Hallman M, Lundgren S, Sennerby L. Histologic analysis of clinical biopsies taken 6 months and 3 years after maxillary sinus floor augmentation with 80% bovine hydroxyapatite and 20% auto-genous bone mixed with fibrin glue. Clin Imp Dent Rel Res 2002;3:87-96
36 Carmagnola D, Adriaens P, Berglundh T. Healing of human extraction sockets filled with Bio-Oss. Coo Oral Impl Res 2003;14:137-143   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Boyne PJ, Cole MD, Stringer D, Shafqat JP. A technique for osseous restoration of deficient edentulous maxillary ridges. J Oral Mexillofac Sur 1985;43:87-91   DOI   ScienceOn
38 Klinge B, Alberius P, Isaksson S, Jonsson J. Osseous response to implanted natural bone mineral and synthetic hydroxylapatite ceramic in the repair of experimental skull bone defects. J Oral Maxillofac Sur 1992;50: 241-249   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Carmagnola D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. The effect of a fibrin glue on the integration of Bio-Oss with bone tissue. An experimental study in labrador dogs. J Clin Periodontal 2002;29:377-383   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE. The application of deproteinized bovine bone mineral for ridge preservation prior to implanta- tion. Clinical and histological observa- tions in a case report. J Periodontol 1998;69:1062-1067   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
41 Berglundh T, Lindhe J, Jonsson K, Ericsson I. The topography of the vascular systems in the periodontal and peri-implant tissues in the dog. J Clin Periodontol 1994;21:189-193   DOI   ScienceOn
42 Hammerle CHF, Olah AJ, Schmid J, Fluckiger L, Winkler JR, Gogolowski S, Lang NP. The biolog-ical effect of deproteinized bovine bone on bone ne- oformation on the rabbit skull. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997;8:198-207   DOI   ScienceOn
43 Araujo M, Carmagnola D, Berglundh T, Thilander B, Lindhe J. Orthodontic movement in bone defects augmented with Bio-Oss, An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontal 2001;28:73-80   DOI   ScienceOn
44 Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: Part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft tissue preserva-tion. Clin Orthop 1989;238:249-281
45 Hurzeler MB, Quinones CR, Kirsh A, Gloker C, Schupbach P, Strub JR, Caffesse R. Maxillary sinus augmenta- tion using different grafting materials and dental implants in monkeys. Part I. Evaluation of anorganic bovine-derived bone matrix. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997;8:476-486
46 Valentini P, Bbensur D, Densari D, Graziani JN, Hammerle C. Histological evaluation and implantation procedure. A human case report. Clin Oral Impl Res 1998;9:59-64   DOI   ScienceOn
47 Weibrich G, Trettin R, Gnoth SH, et al, Analysis of the size of the specific surface area of bone regeneration mat- erials by gas adsorption. Mund-Kiefer Gesichts Chir 2000;1-5
48 Artzi Z, Nemcovsky CE, Tal H, Dayan D. Histopathological morphometric evaluation of 2 different hydroxyapatite- bone derivatives in sinus augmentation procedures: A comparative study in humans. J Periodontol 2001;72:911-920   DOI   ScienceOn
49 Karabuda D, Ozdemir O, Tosun T, Anil A, Oglac V. Histological and clinical evaluation of 3 differ-ent grafting materals for sinus lifting procedure based on 8 cases. J Periodontol 2001;72:1436-1442   DOI
50 Artzi Z, Tal H, Dayan D. Porous bovine bone mineral in healing of human extraction sockets. Part 1. Histomorp- hometric evaluation at 9 months. J Periodontol 2001;71:1015-1023
51 Piattelli M, Favero GA, Scarano A, Orsini G, Piattelli A. Bone reactions to anorganic bovine bone(Bio-Oss) used in sinus augmentation pro-cedure: A his- tologic long term of 20 cases in humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp 1999;14:835-840
52 Slotte C, Lundgren D. Augmentation of calvarial tissue using non-permeable silicone domes and bovine bone mineral. An experimental study in the rat. Cliri Oral Impl Res 1999;10:468-476   DOI   ScienceOn
53 Hammerle CHF, Schmid J, Olah AJ, Lang NP. A novel model stystem for the study of experimen-tal bone formation in humans. Clin Oral Impl Res 1996;7:38-47   DOI   ScienceOn
54 Wheeler SL, Holmes RE, Clahoun CJ. Six-year clinical and histologic study of sinus-lift grafts. Int J Oral Macillofac Imp 1996;11:26-34
55 Benezra Rosen V, Hobbs LW, Spector M. The ultrastructure of anorganic bovine bone and seclected synthetic hydroxyapatites used as bone graft substitute materials. Biomaterials 2002;23:921-928   DOI   ScienceOn
56 Dahlin C. Lekholm U, Becker W, Becker B, Higuchi K, Callens A, van Steenberghe D. Treatment of fenestra- tion and dehiscence bone defects around oral implants using the guided tissue regeneration technique: A prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Mexillofac Imp 1995;10:312-318
57 Wetzel AC, Stich H, Caffesse RG. Bone apposi-tion onto oral implants in the sinus area filled with different grafting materials. Clin Oral Impl Res 1995;6: 155-163   DOI   ScienceOn
58 Urist MR. Bone: Formation by aut- oinduction. Science 1965;150:893-899   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
59 Rodan GA. Mechanical loading, estrogen deficiency, and the coupling of bone formation to bone resorption: Comment. J Bone Miner Res 1991;6:527-530   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
60 Kostopoulos L & Karring T. Augmenta- tion of the rat mandible using guided tissue regeneration. Clin Oral Impl Res 1994;5:75-82   DOI   ScienceOn
61 Becker W, Schenk R, Higuchi K, Lekholm U, Becker BE. Variations in bone regereration adja-cent to implants augmented with barrier membranes alone or with demineralized freeze-dried bone or autologous grafts: A study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Imp 1995;10:143-154
62 Hammerle CHF, Schmid J, Lang NP, Olah AJ. Temporal dynamics of healing in rabbit cranial defects using guided bone regeneration. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:167-174   DOI   ScienceOn
63 이근혁. 골유도재생술시 그물형 티타늄막의 천공수가 골형성에 미치는 영향. 경희대학교 치과대학 치주과 교실 박사학위논문. 2003