Browse > Article

Effect of embossed new dental pick on periodontitis  

Suk, Hun-Joo (Department of Periodontology, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Kim, Chong-Kwan (Department of Periodontology, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science / v.34, no.3, 2004 , pp. 563-572 More about this Journal
Abstract
Since bacterial plaque is known as the major cause of every oral disease, it is necessary to control plaque to maintain periodontal health. Although tooth brushing has been the typical method of plaque control, additional use of plaque control devices are necessary for cleansing interdental areas. Dental floss has been used for a long time as the additional plaque control device and proved to be effective. The newly developed embossed new dental pick is composed of elastic plastic material in form with its tip longer than other toothpick. In addition, as thickness of the tip gradually increases, it can be adapted easily with minimal trauma to interdental gingiva. The embossed tip can remove dental plaque easily, and the opposite end can approach lingual and palatal areas through triple angulation. Therefore, the authors studied the effect of embossed new dental pick and dental floss on periodontally involved 15 patient. The following results were obtained. 1. For embossed new dental pick, probing depth at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks were $3.6{\pm}0.6mm$, $3.4{\pm}0.5mm$, $3.2{\pm}0.5mm$, respectively, and $4.2{\pm}0.9mm$, $4.1{\pm}0.9mm$, $4.0{\pm}0.9mm$, respectivly for clinical attachment level. 2. In case of embossed new dental pick, bleeding on probing at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks were $43.0{\pm}4.4%$, $28.5{\pm}5.1%$, $22.2{\pm}5.6%$, respectively, and, at 1 week and 4 weeks, they were significantly different from that of dental floss. 3. Gingival index of toαhpick at baseline, 1 week, 4 weeks were $1.7{\pm}0.5$, $1.0{\pm}0.3$, $0.9{\pm}0.2$, respectively, and, $1.7{\pm}0.5$, $1.1{\pm}0.4$, $1.0{\pm}0.4$, respectively for plaque index, and $3.0{\pm}0.5$, $1.7{\pm}0.5$, $1.4{\pm}0.4$, respectively for proximal plaque index. proximal plaque index at 4 weeks was significantly different from that of dental floss. 4. The result of questionnaire showed that the two types of device were both satisfactory, however, embossed new dental pick had higher preference as well as satisfaction. As a result, embossed new dental pick is thought to be clinically effective for its simplicity and good accessibility.
Keywords
embossed new dental pick; plaque control; floss;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Theilade J.: Dental plaque & Dental calculus; In Lindhe J., Textbook of periodontology, 1983., Cophenhagen: Munksgaard
2 Grossman E., Reiter G., Sturzenberger O. P., Six month study of the effects of a chlorhexidine mouthrinse on gingivitis in adult, J. Periodont. Res. (Suppl), 16:33, 1986
3 Burgett F. G., Ash M. M., Comparative study of the pressure of brushing with three types of toothbrushes, J. Periodontol., 45:410, 1974
4 Vassiliki C., Mark F. T., Ubele V., Fridus A. W.: Comparision of different approaches of inter-dental oral hygiene : Interdental brush versus dental floss, J. Periodontol., 69: 759-764, 1998
5 Carter H. C., Gadbury A. C., Killoy W.: Comparision of the plaque removal efficacy of a new flossing aid(Quik $Floss^{\circledR}$) to finger flossing, J. Clin. Periodontol., 23:873-878, 1996
6 Schmid M., Balmelli O., Saxer U.: Plaque-removing effect of a toothbrush, dental floss and a toothpick, J. Clin. Periodontol., 3: 157-165, 1976
7 Loe H.: The gingival index, the plaque index and the retention index system, J. Periodontol., 38: 610, 1967
8 Sangnes G. B., Zachrisson B., Gjermo P.: Effectiveness of vertical and horizontal brushing in plaque removal, Journal of Dentistry for Children. 39: 94-97, 1972
9 Hine M. K.: The use of toothbrush in the treat-ment of periodontitis, J. A. D. A., 41: 158, 1950
10 정예진, 김창성, 서종진, 조규성, 채중규, 김종관, 최성호.: 치태제거 및 치은염증에 대한 실리콘 칫솔의 효과, 대한치주과학회지, 30 : 911-921, 2000
11 Hansen F., Gjermo P,. The plaque removing effect of Four toothbrushing methods, Scandinavian Journal of Dental Research, 79: 502-506, 1971
12 Max O. S., Oreste P. B., Ulrich P. S.: Plaque-removing effect of a toothbrush, dental floss, and a toothpick, J. Clin. Periodontol., 3: 157-165, 1976
13 Wolffe G. N.: An evaluation of proximal surface cleansing agents, J. Clin. Periodontol., 3: 148-156, 1976
14 Meitner S. W., Zander I. I., Polson A.: Identification of inflamed gingival surface, J. Clin. Periodontol., 6: 93-97, 1979
15 Gjermo P., Flotra L.: The Effect of different methods of interdental cleaning, J. Periodontal Res., 5: 230-236, 1970
16 Berodn J. K., Hornbrook H. H., Hayduk S. E.: An evaluation of 6 manual toothbrushes comparing their effectiveness in plaque removal, J. Periodontol., 45: 496, 1974
17 Bergenholtz A., Brithon J.: Plaque removal by dental floss or toothpick, J. Clin. Periodontol., 7: 516-524, 1980
18 Kiger R. D., Nylund K., Feller R. P.: A compari-sion of proximal plaque removal using floss and interdental brushes, J. Clin. Periodontol., 18: 681-684, 1991
19 Ainamo J.: Control of plaque by chemical agent, J. Clin. Periodontol., 4: 23, 1977
20 Ong G.: The effectiveness of 3 types of dental floss for interdental plaque removal, J. Clin. Periodontol., 17:463-466, 1990