Browse > Article

Histomorphometric evaluation of the implant designed by shape optimization technique  

Kwon, Hyuk-Rak (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Moon, Sang-Kwon (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Shim, Joon-sung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
Ahn, Sei-young (Solco Bio-medical Engineering Institute)
Lee, Hun (Solco Bio-medical Engineering Institute)
Kim, Han-Sung (Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yonsei University.)
Choi, Seong-ho (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Brain Korea 21project for Medical Science, Yonsei University)
Kim, Chong-Kwan (Department of Periodontology, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Brain Korea 21project for Medical Science, Yonsei University)
Publication Information
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science / v.34, no.1, 2004 , pp. 35-48 More about this Journal
Abstract
Since the occlusal loading is transmitted to the surrounding bone, the success of an implant treatment is closely related to the distribution of the stress on the implant. The finite element analysis method is often used in order to produce a model for dispersion of stress. Assessment of the success of the implant is usually based on the degree of osseointegration which is a bone and implant surface interface. Implant used in this research was designed through the method of shape optimization after the stress on implant was anaylzed by the finite element analysis method. This study was pertinently assessed by a clinical, histologic, histomorphometric analysis after the shape optimized implant was installed on beagle dog tibia. The results are as follows 1. It clinically showed a good result without mobility and imflammatory reaction. 2. Implant was supported by dense bone and bone remodeling showed on the surrounding area of the implant 3. The average percentage of bone-implant contact was 58.1%.The percentage of bone density was 57.6%. Having above results, shape optimized implant showed the pertinence through clinical and histologic aspects. However, to use the shape optimized implant, the further experiment is required for finding problems, improvement.
Keywords
Stress; Finite element analysis; Shape optimization; Bone Implant Contact; Bone density;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Branemark P-I, Breine U, Adell R, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intraosseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969; 3: 81-100   DOI
2 Lewinstein I, Banks-sills L, Eliasi R. Finite element analysis of a new system(IL) for supporting an implant-retained cantilever prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995 May-Jun; 10(3): 355-66   PUBMED
3 del Valle V, Faulkner G, Wolfaardt J. Craniofacial osseointegrated implant-induced strain distribute numerical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997 Mar-Apr; 12(2): 200-10   PUBMED
4 Meijer, HJA, starmans FJM, Steen WHA & Bosman F. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of bone around dental implants in an edentulous human mandible. Archives of Oral Biology 1993; 38: 491-196   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Teixeria ER, Sato Y, Akagawa Y, Shindoi N. A comparative evaluation of mandibular finite element models with different lengths and elements for implants biomechanics. J Oral Rebabil 1998 Apr; 25(4): 299-303   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Mattheck, C., and Burkhardt, S., 'A New Method of Structural Shape Optimization Based on Biological Growth,' International Journal of Fatigue 1990; 12(3): 185-190
7 Eriksson RA, Albrektsson T:Temperature threshlod levels for heat-induced bone tissue injury: A vital micorscopic study in the rabbit. J Prosthet Dent 1983; 50: 101-7   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Robert RW, Smith, Zilberman Y, Mozsary PG, Smith R. Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants. Am J orthod 1984; 86: 95-111   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Ericsson I, Nilson H, Lindh, Nilner K, Randow K. immedeate functional loading of Branema가 single tooth implants. An 18month follow-up study. Clin Oral Implans Res 2001; 11: 26-33
10 Albrektsson T, Johansson C. Quantified bone tissue reactions to various metallic materials with reference to the so-called osseointegration concept. In: Davies JE, ed. The Bone-biomaterial Interface. Toronto: University of Toronto Press 1991; 357-363
11 Buser, D., Schenk, RK.,Steinmann, S. Fiorellini, P., Fox, CH. & Stich, H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium iplants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. Journal of Biomedical Materials Reserch 1991; 25: 889-902
12 Abrahamsson, I., Berglundh, T., Moon IS & Lindhe, J. Peri-implat tissue at submerged and non-submerged titanium implants. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 1989; 26: 600-607
13 Albrektsson T. Zarb G. Worthington P. Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J. Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; summer: 1(1): 11-25
14 Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm V. Eary failures in 4,641 consecutively placed $Br{\"{a}}nemark$ dental implants. A study from stage I surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implnats 1991; 6: 142-146
15 Holmes DC, Grigsby WR, Goel VK, Keller JC. Comparison of stress transmission in the IMZ implant system polyoxymethylene or titanium intramobile element: a finite element stress anaylsis. Jin J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992 Winter; 7(4): 450-8
16 Paolo Trisi, Richard Lazzara, Alberto rebau야, Walter Rao, Tiziano testori, Stephan S. Porter. Bone-implnat contact on machined and dual acid-etched surfaces after 2months of healing in the human maxilla. J Periodontol 2003; 74: 945-56   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Weinberg, LA. The biomechanics of force distribution in implant-supported prostheses. Internatonal Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1993; 8: 19-27
18 Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Osseointegration: A requiem for the periodontal ligament? [guest editorial]. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1991; 11: 88-91.
19 Brunski JB. Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface. Clin Mater 1992; 10(3): 153-201   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
20 Reilly DT, Burstein AH. The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. J. Biomech 1975; 8(6): 393-405   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Abrahamsson, I., Berglundh, T., Moon IS & Lindhe, J. Peri-implat tissue at submerged and non-submerged titanium implants. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 1989; 26: 600-607
22 Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of $Br{\"{a}}nemark$ fixtures in type IV bone: A 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991; 62: 2-4   DOI   PUBMED
23 Dixon, D.L., Breeding, L.C., Peter Sadler, J. & Mckay, M.L. Comparison of screw loosening, rotation, and deflection among three implant designs. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1995; 74, 270-278
24 김한성, 이상업, 조남효, 고재영, 박상수, 이훈, 안세영, 심준성, 이철영, 문홍석, '치과용 임프란트의 형상과 계면 응력의 상관관계' 대한정밀공학회 2002; 춘계: 128-131
25 Schroeder A, Pohler O, Sutler F. Tissue reaction to an implant of a titanium hollow cylinder with a titanium surface spray layer. SSO Schwiez Monatoschr Zahneilkd 1976 Jul; 86(7): 713-27
26 Wennerberg A, Ektessabi A, Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Andersson B. A 1-year follow-up of implants of differing surface roughness placed in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997; 12: 486-494   PUBMED
27 Skalak R. Biomechanical consideration in osseointegrated prostheses. J. Prosthet Dent 1983 jun; 49(6): 843-848
28 Zienkiewicz, OC., and Campbell, JS., 'Shape Optimization and Sequential Linear Programming,' in R. H. Gallagher and O.C. Zienkiewiczt(ed.), Optimum Structural Design Theory and Application 1973; 109-126
29 Johansson, CB. & Albrectsson, T. A removal torque and histomorphometric study of commercially pure nobium and titanium implant in rabbit bone. Clinical Oral Implants Research 1991; 2: 24-29   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Adell, R., Lekholm, U., Rockler, B., Branemark, P. Lindhe, J., Eriksson, B. & Sbordone, L. Marginal tissue reactions at osseintegrated titanium fixtures. A 3-years longitudinal prospective study. International journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 1986; 15: 39-52
31 Thomsen, P., Ericsson LE. Titanium impalnts in rabbit knee joints. Acta OrtopScand; 1987; 58: 256-269
32 Weinlaender M, Kenney EB, Lekovic V, et al: Histomorphometry of bone apposition around three types ofdental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg, in press
33 CHUN HY, CHEONG SY, HAN JH, HEO SJ, CHUNG SJ, RHYU IC, CHOI YC, BAIKHK, KU Y, .KIM. MH. Evaluation of design parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite elements. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2002; 29: 565-574
34 Holmgren EP, Seckinger RJ, Kilgren LM, Manle F. Evaluating Parameters of osseointergrated dental implants using finite elements analysis - a two - dimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. J. Oral Implantoly 1998; 24(2):80-8   DOI   ScienceOn
35 M. Quirynen, I. Naert, D. van Steenberghe: Fixture design and overload influence marginal boneloss and fixture success in the $Br{\"{a}}nemark$ system. Clin Oral Impl Res 1992; 3: 104-111
36 Buser, D., Mericske-Stern, R., Bernard, JP., Behneke, A,. Behneke, N., Hirt, HP., Belser, UC. & Lang, NP. Longterm evaluation of nonsubmerged ITI implants Part1:8year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clinical Oral Implants Reserch 1997; 8: 161-172
37 Meijer GJ, Starmans FJ, De Petter C, van Blictenswijk CA. The influence of a flexible coating on the bone stress around dental implants. J Oral Rehabil 1995 Feb; 22(2):105-11   DOI   ScienceOn
38 이상업, 김한성, 조남효, 고재영, 박상수, 심준성, 문홍석, 유용석, '치과용 임플란트의 형상에 대한 매개변수 해석', 제26회 대한의용생체공학회 춘계, 2002