Browse > Article

The comparison between 2 wide implants and 3 regular implants in mandibular posterior area  

Yoo, Ho-Sun (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration)
So, Sung-Soo (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration)
Han, Dong-Hoo (Department of Prosthodontics, Department of Prosthodontics, Yonsei University)
Cho, Kyoo-Sung (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration)
Moon, Ik-Sang (Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University, Research Institute for Periodontal Regeneration)
Publication Information
Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science / v.32, no.3, 2002 , pp. 577-588 More about this Journal
Abstract
Osseointegrated implants have been established as the standard treatment modality for full/partial edentulous patients since the 1960's, and the long term results for full edentulous patients have proven to be successful. Based on these results osseointegrated implants are now widely used for partial edentulous patients. There has been an increased interest towards the efficacy of wide implants, despite many reports mentioning the lower success rate of wide implants compared to regular implants. Recently, mandibular molar area defects are commonly restored using 2 wide implants, but it is not determined whether which treatment modality-3 regular implants or 2 wide implants-shows superior success rate. In this study, 2 wide implants and 3 regular implants used for the restoration of mandibular molar area are used to compare the survival rate of 1-4 years, and to analyze and compare the failure factors. The following conclusions could be drawn from this study. 1. Wide implants and regular implants showed 94.5% and 97,6% of survival rate respectively. After prosthodontic work, the survival rate was 100% and 98.1% for wide implants and regular implants respectively. 2. 5 failed implants have been removed. 2 wide implants and 1 regular implant have been removed due to failure of osseointegration. 1 wide implant was removed due to abscess formation caused by over-heating, and 1 regular implant was removed due to mechanical failure caused by over-loading within the first year of function. 3. No statistically significant difference was observed with respect to the amount of marginal bone loss of wide and regular implants.(P>0.05) In conclusion, restoration of the mandibular molar area using 3 regular implants was found to be a good treatment modality, and 2 wide implants could he considered a good treatment modality when success factors are taken into account.
Keywords
Wide implant; regular implant; success rate; marginal bone loss;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Hoyer SA, Stanford CM, Buranadham S, Fridrich T, Wanger J, Gratton D. Dynamic fatigue properties of the dental implant-abutment interface: joint opening in wide-diameter versus standarddiameter hex-type implants. J Prosthet Dent, 2001; 85(6): 599-607   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Jemt T, Lekholm U, Adell R. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients: A preliminary study of 876 consecutively installed fixtures, Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl, 1989; 4: 211-217
3 van Steenberghe D, Sullivan D, Listrom R, Balshi T, Henry PJ, Worthington P. A retrospective multicenter evaluation of the survival rate of osseointegrated fixtures supporting bridges in the treatment of partial edentulism. J Prosthet Dent, 1989; 61: 217-223   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
4 Sewerin IP. Estimation of angulation of Branemark Titanium fixtures from radiographic thread images. Clin Oral Implant Research, 1991; 2: 20-23   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Lekholm U, van Steenberghe D, Herrman I, Bolender C, Folmer T, Gunne J, Henry P, Higuchi K, Lanely WR & Lindhe U. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous jaws: A prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl, 1994; 9: 627-635
6 Rangert B, Jernt T, Jorneus L. Forces and moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl, 1989; 4: 241-247
7 Lindh T, Gunne J, Tillberg A, Molin M. A metaanalysis of implants in partial edentulism. Clin Oral Impl Res, 1998; 9: 80-90   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4641 consecutively placed Branernark dental implants: A study form stage 1 surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl, 1991; 6: 142-146
9 Book K, Karlsson S, Jemt T. Functional adaptation to full arch fixed prosthesis supported by osseointegrated implants in the edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Impl Res, 1992; 3: 17-21   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Naert I, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D, Darius P. A six-year prosthetic study of 509 consecutively inserted implants for the treatment of partial edentulism. J Prosthet Dent, 1992; 67: 236-245   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Haraldson T. A photoelastic study of some biomechanical factors affecting the anchorage of osseointegrated implants in the jaw. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg, 1980; 14: 209-213   DOI
12 van Steenberghe D, Lekholm U, Bolender C, Folmenr T, Henry PJ, Hermann I. The applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: A prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl, 1990; 5: 272-281
13 Schnitman PA, Wohrle PS, Rubenstein JE, Dasilva JD, Wang. Ten-year results for Branernark implants immediately loaded with fixed prosthesis at implant placement. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl, 1997; 12: 495-503
14 Glantz P. The clinical longevity of crown-andbridge prostheses for the preservation, J Prosthet Dent, 1989; 2: 210-218
15 Quirynen M, Naert I, Glantz PO. A six-year prosthetic study of 509 consecutively inserted implants for the treatment of partial edentulism. J Prosthet Dent, 1992; 67: 236-245   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent, 1983; 50: 399-410   DOI   ScienceOn
17 Siegele D. Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl, 1989; 4: 333-340
18 Branemark PI, Zarb G & Albrektsson T. Tissueintegrated prosthesis. Osseo-integration in clinical dentistry. Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc. Chicago, 1985
19 Insidor F. Histological evaluation of peri-implant bone at implants subjected to occlusal overload or plaque accumulation. Clin Oral Impl Res, 1997; 8: 1-9   DOI   ScienceOn
20 양순봉. 부분무치악 환자에서 보철물 장착후 골 유착성 임플란트 주위 치조골 소실에 미치는 영향에 관한 방사선학적 연구, 대한 치과보철학회지 1996; 34(1): 70-84
21 Wolfe LA. Stressanalysis of endosseous implants using the Boundary Integral Equation(BIE) method. J Biomed Eng, 1993; 15: 319-323   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Roberts WE, Garetto LP, Decastro RA. Remodeling of devitalized bone threatens periosteal margin integrity of endosseous titanium implants with threaded or smooth surfaces : indications for provisional loading and axially directed occlusion. J Indiana Dental Association, 1989; 68: 19-24
23 Gunne J, Astrand P, AhIen K, Borg K, Olsson M. Implants in partially edentulous patients. A longitudinal study of bridges supported by both implants and natural teeth. Clin Oral Impl Res, 1992; 3: 49-56   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Polizzi G, Rangert B, Lekholm U, Gualini F, Lindstrom H. Branemark system wide platform implants for single molar replacement: A clinical evaluation of prospective and retrospective materials. Clin Oral Impl Res, 1998; 9: 80-90   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Tonetti M. Risk factors for osseodisintegration. Periodontology 2000, 1998; 17: 55-62   DOI   ScienceOn
26 박기현. 보철물 장착후 골유착성 임플란트 변연골 소실에 관한 방사선학적 연구. 1998; 36(3): 455-464
27 Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC & Lang NP. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants (I). 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-Center study with 2359 implants, Clin Oral Impl Res, 1997; 8: 161-172   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Branernark PI & Jemt T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl, 1990; 5: 347-359
29 Ericsson I, Branemark PI, Glantz PO. Partial edentulism. In:Worthington P. Branemark Pl(eds), Advanced Osseointegration Surgery: Applications In The Maxillofacial Region. Chicago: Quintessence, 1992: 206-209
30 Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Branemark PI & Jemt T. Marginal tissue reactions at the osseointegrated titanium fixtures; A three-year longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Surg, 1986; 15: 38-52
31 Nevins M, Langer B. The successful application of osseointegrated implants to the posterior jaw ; a long-term retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl, 1993; 8: 428-432
32 Lekholm U, Zarb G. Patient selection and preparation. In.Branemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, eds, Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence, 1985: 199-209
33 Jemt T, Lekholm U. Oral implant treatment in posterior partially edentulous jaws: A 5-year follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl, 1993; 8: 635-640
34 Leonhardt A, Adolfsson B, Lekholm U, Wikstrom M & Dahlen G. A longitudinal microbiological study on osseointegrated titanium implants in partially edentulous patients. Clin Oral Impl Res, 1993; 4: 113-120   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Henry PJ, Tolman D, Bolender C. The applicability of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous patients; Three-year results of a prospective multicenter study. Quintessence Int, 1993; 24: 123-129
36 Mombelli A, Marxer M, Gaberthuel T, Grunder U & Lang NP. The microbiota of osseointegrated implants in patients with a history of periodontal disease. J Clin Periodont, 1995; 22: 124-130   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Steenberge D, Warrer K, Karring T. The rehabilitation of oral defects by osseointegrated implant. J Clin Periodontol, 1991; 18: 488-493   DOI
38 Lekholm U. The Branemark implant technique: A standardized procedure under continuous development. In Lanev WR, Tolman DE (eds), Tissue Integration in Oral Orthopedic and Maxillofacial Reconstruction. Chicago: Quitessence, 1992; 64: 194-199