1 |
D. D. Anderson and V. Camillo, Armendariz rings and Gaussian rings, Comm. Algebra 26 (1998), no. 7, 2265-2272.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
2 |
D. D. Anderson and V. Camillo, Semigroups and rings whose zero products commute, Comm. Algebra 27 (1999), no. 6, 2847-2852.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
3 |
E. P. Armendariz, A note on extensions of Baer and P.P.-rings, J. Aust. Math. Soc. 18 (1974), 470-473.
DOI
|
4 |
V. Camillo and P. P. Nielsen, McCoy rings and zero-divisors, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 212 (2008), no. 3, 599-615.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
5 |
C. Huh, Y. Lee, and A. Smoktunowicz, Armendariz rings and semicommutative rings, Comm. Algebra 30 (2002), no. 2, 751-761.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
P. M. Cohn, Reversible rings, Bull. London Math. Soc. 31 (1999), no. 6, 641-648.
DOI
|
7 |
K. R. Goodearl and R. B. Warfield, Jr., An Introduction to Noncommutative Noetherian Rings, Cambridge University Press, 1989.
|
8 |
C. Y. Hong, Y. C. Jeon, N. K. Kim, and Y. Lee, The McCoy condition on noncommu- tative rings, Comm. Algebra 39 (2011), no. 5, 1809-1825.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
Y. C. Jeon, H. K. Kim, N. K. Kim, T. K. Kwak, Y. Lee, and D. E. Yeo, On a general-ization of the McCoy condition, J. Korean Math. Soc. 47 (2010), no. 6, 1269-1282.
과학기술학회마을
DOI
ScienceOn
|
10 |
L. G. Jones and L. Weiner, Advanced Problems and Solutions, Solutions 4419, Amer. Math. Monthly 59 (1952), no. 5, 336-337.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
11 |
B. O. Kim, T. K. Kwak, and Y. Lee, On constant zero-divisors of linear polynomials, Comm. Algebra (to appear).
|
12 |
N. K. Kim and Y. Lee, Armendariz rings and reduced rings, J. Algebra 223 (2000), no. 2, 477-488.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
13 |
N. K. Kim, Y. Lee, and Y. Seo, Structure of idempotents in rings, (submitted).
|
14 |
T. K. Lee and Y. Q. Zhou, Armendariz and reduced rings, Comm. Algebra 32 (2004), no. 6, 2287-2299.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
15 |
T. K. Kwak and Y. Lee, Rings over which coefficients of nilpotent polynomials are nilpotent, Internat. J. Algebra Comput. 21 (2011), no. 5, 745-762.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
16 |
J. Lambek, Lectures on Rings and Modules, Blaisdell Publishing Company, Waltham, 1966.
|
17 |
J. Lambek, On the representation of modules by sheaves of factor modules, Canad. Math. Bull. 14 (1971), 359-368.
DOI
|
18 |
N. H. McCoy, Remarks on divisors of zero, Amer. Math. Monthly 49 (1942), 286-295.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
19 |
M. B. Rege and S. Chhawchharia, Armendariz rings, Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci. 73 (1997), no. 1, 14-17.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
20 |
L. Motais de Narbonne, Anneaux semi-commutatifs et unis riels anneaux dont les id aux principaux sont idempotents, In: Proceedings of the 106th National Congress of Learned Societies (Perpignan, 1981), 71-73, Bib. Nat., Paris, 1982.
|
21 |
P. P. Nielsen, Semi-commutativity and the McCoy condition, J. Algebra 298 (2006), no. 1, 134-141.
|
22 |
V. S. Ramamurthi, Weakly regular rings, Canad. Math. Bull. 16 (1973), 317-321.
DOI
|
23 |
L. Xu and W. Xue, Structure of minimal non-commutative zero-insertive rings, Math. J. Okayama Univ. 40 (1998), 69-76.
|
24 |
W. Xue, Structure of minimal noncommutative duo rings and minimal strongly bounded non-duo rings, Comm. Algebra 20 (1992), no. 9, 2777-2788.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
25 |
T. K. Kwak, Y. Lee, and S. J. Yun, The Armendariz property on ideals, J. Algebra 354 (2012), 121-135.
DOI
ScienceOn
|
26 |
N. K. Kim and Y. Lee, Extensions of reversible rings, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 185 (2003), no. 1-3, 207-223.
DOI
ScienceOn
|