1 |
T. Marley, Unmixed local rings of type two are Cohen-Macaulay, Bull. London Math. Soc. 23 (1991), no. 1, 43-45
DOI
|
2 |
H. Matsumura, Commutative ring theory, Camb. Study Adv. Math. 8, Cambridge 1986
|
3 |
Y. Aoyama, Complete local rings of type n 3 are Cohen-Macaulay, Proc. Japan Acard. Ser. A Math. Sci. 70 (1994), no. 3, 80-83
DOI
|
4 |
H. Bass, On the ubiquity of Gorenstein rings, Math. Z. 82 (1963), 8-28
DOI
|
5 |
W. Bruns, The Evans- Griffith syzygy theorem and Bass numbers, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 115 (1992), no. 4, 939-946
DOI
ScienceOn
|
6 |
D. Costa, C. Huneke, and M. Miller, Complete local domains of type two are Cohen-Macaulay, Bull. London Math. Soc. 17 (1985), no. 1, 29-31
DOI
|
7 |
H. B. Foxby, On the in a minimal injective resolution II, Math. Scand. 41 (1977), no. 1, 19-44
DOI
|
8 |
T. Kawasaki, Local rings of relatively small type are Cohen-Macaulay, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 122 (1994), 703-709
DOI
ScienceOn
|
9 |
K. Lee, A note on types of Noetherian local rings, Bull. Korean Math. Soc. 39 (2002), no. 4, 645-652
과학기술학회마을
DOI
|
10 |
P. Roberts, Homological invariants of modules over commutative rings, Sem. Math. Sup., Presses Univ. Montreal, Montreal, 1980
|
11 |
W. V. Vasconcelos, Divisor theory in module categories, Math. Studies 14, North Holland Publ. Co., Amsterdam, 1974
|
12 |
P. Roberts, Rings of type 1 are Gorenstein, Bull. London Math. Soc. 15 (1983), no. 1, 48-50
DOI
|