Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2021.37.1.23

Investigation of effect of zirconia on osseointegration by surface treatments  

Jeong, Jin-Woo (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Song, Young-Gyun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Publication Information
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science / v.37, no.1, 2021 , pp. 23-30 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to investigate effect of zirconia on osseointegration and Surface appearance by surface treatments using various acid solution. Materials and Methods: The prepared zirconia disks were treated with hydrofluoric acid solution and photo-assisted etching under various condition. The surface was analyzed by SEM and the surface roughness was analyzed by using surface profiler. The osteogenic effect of MC3T3-E1 cells was assessed via fluorescent staining observation and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Results: Various roughness were obtained according to the surface treatment method. The surface roughness increased in the group treated with hydrofluoric acid solution, but that had week network structure. In the method using photo-assisted etching, the surface roughness increased in micro units. Cell reaction showed better results in the photo-assisted etching group than in the hydrofluoric acid-treated group (P < 0.05). And it showed even osteoblastic cell distribution in photo-assisted etching group. Conclusion: As a result, the photo-assisted etching method is more effective than the simple acid solution treatment for zirconia treatment for osseointegration.
Keywords
zirconia; osseointegration; surface treatment;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Sriamporn T, Thamrongananskul N, Busabok C, Poolthong S, Uo M, Tagami J. Dental zirconia can be etched by hydrofluoric acid. Dent Mater J 2014;33:79-85.   DOI
2 Vander Wall EM, Whitener EM. Concentrated Nitric and Dilute Hydrofluoric Acid Mixtures in Dissolution of Zirconium Metal. Ind Eng Chem 1959;51:51-4.   DOI
3 Prajapati RR, Srinivasan TG, Chandramouli V, Bhagwat SS. Dissolution kinetics of zirconia dioxide in nitric acid. Desalin Water Treat 2014;52:490-7.   DOI
4 Xie H, Shen S, Qian M, Zhang F, Chen C, Tay FR. Effects of Acid Treatment on Dental Zirconia: An In Vitro Study. PLoS One 2015;10:e0136263.   DOI
5 Hao L, Lawrence J, Chian KS. Osteoblast cell adhesion on a laser modified zirconia based bioceramic. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2005;16:719-26.   DOI
6 Yamashita D, Machigashira M, Miyamoto M, Takeuchi H, Noguchi K, Izumi Y, Ban S. Effect of surface roughness on initial responses of osteoblast-like cells on two types of zirconia. Dent Mater J 2009;28:461-70.   DOI
7 Hempel U, Hefti T, Kalbacova M, Wolf-Brandstetter C, Dieter P, Schlottig F. Response of osteoblast-like SAOS-2 cells to zirconia ceramics with different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:174-81.   DOI
8 Ito H, Sasaki H, Saito K, Honma S, Yajima Y, Yoshinari M. Response of osteoblast-like cells to zirconia with different surface topography. Dent Mater J 2013;32:122-9.   DOI
9 Klokkevold PR, Nishimura RD, Adachi M, Caputo A. Osseointegration enhanced by chemical etching of the titanium surface. A torque removal study in the rabbit. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:442-7.   DOI
10 Marinho VC, Celletti R, Bracchetti G, Petrone G, Minkin C, Piattelli A. Sandblasted and acid-etched dental implants: a histologic study in rats. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:75-81.
11 Aboushelib MN, Salem NA, Abo Taleb AL, El Moniem NM. Influence of surface nano-roughness on osseointegration of zirconia implants in rabbit femur heads using selective infiltration etching technique. J Oral Implantol 2013;39:583-90.   DOI
12 Aldini NN, Fini M, Giavaresi G, Martini L, Dubini B, Ponzi Bossi MG, Rustichelli F, Krajewski A, Ravaglioli A, Mazzocchi M, Giardino R. Osteointegration of bioactive glass-coated and uncoated zirconia in osteopenic bone: an in vivo experimental study. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004;68:264-72.
13 Urban RM, Jacobs JJ, Tomlinson MJ, Gavrilovic J, Black J, Peoc'h M. Dissemination of wear particles to the liver, spleen, and abdominal lymph nodes of patients with hip or knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000;82:457-76.
14 Guo H, Khor KA, Boey YC, Miao X. Laminated and functionally graded hydroxyapatite/yttria stabilized tetragonal zirconia composites fabricated by spark plasma sintering. Biomaterials 2003;24:667-75.   DOI
15 Li J, Liu Y, Hermansson L, Soremark R. Evaluation of biocompatibility of various ceramic powders with human fibroblasts in vitro. Clin Mater 1993;12:197-201.   DOI
16 Matsumoto S, Toguchi M, Takeda K, Narita T, Kachi T, Sato T. Effects of a photo-assisted electrochemical etching process removing dry-etching damage in GaN. Jpn J Appl Physics 2018;57:121001.   DOI
17 Choi YH, Balk KH, Choi R, Oh J. Photo-Enhanced Acid Chemical Etching of High-Quality Aluminum Nitride Grown by Metal-Organic Chemical Vapor Deposition. ECS J Solid State Sci Tech 2019;8:N42-6.   DOI
18 Baraissov Z, Pacco A, Koneti S, Bisht G, Panciera F, Holsteyns F, Mirsaidov U. Selective Wet Etching of Silicon Germanium in Composite Vertical Nanowires. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2019;11:36839-46.   DOI
19 Stejskal J, Stejskal VD. The role of metals in autoimmunity and the link to neuroendocrinology. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 1999;20:351-64.
20 Schliephake H, Reiss G, Urban R, Neukam FW, Guckel S. Metal release from titanium fixtures during placement in the mandible: an experimental study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:502-11.
21 Andreiotelli M, Kohal RJ. Fracture strength of zirconia implants after artificial aging. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009;11:158-66.   DOI
22 Silva NRFA, Coelho PG, Fernandes CAO, Navarro JM, Dias RA, Thompson VP. Reliability of onepiece ceramic implant. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;88:419-26.
23 Kohal RJ, Wolkewitz M, Mueller C. Alumina-reinforced zirconia implants: survival rate and fracture strength in a masticatory simulation trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:1345-52.   DOI
24 Elani HW, Starr JR, Da Silva JD, Gallucci GO. Trends in Dental Implant Use in the U.S., 1999-2016, and Projections to 2026. J Dent Res 2018;97:1424-30.   DOI
25 Akagawa Y, Hosokawa R, Sato Y, Kamayama K. Comparison between freestanding and tooth-connected partially stabilized zirconia implants after two years' function in monkeys: a clinical and histologic study. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:551-8.   DOI
26 Scarano A, Di Carlo F, Quaranta M, Piattelli A. Bone response to zirconia ceramic implants: an experimental study in rabbits. J Oral Implantol 2003;29:8-12.   DOI
27 Kohal RJ, Weng D, Bachle M, Strub JR. Loaded custom-made zirconia and titanium implants show similar osseointegration: an animal experiment. J Periodontol 2004;75:1262-8.   DOI
28 Heydecke G, Kohal R, Glaser R. Optimal esthetics in single-tooth replacement with the Re-Implant system: a case report. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:184-9.
29 Kohal RJ, Wolkewitz M, Hinze M, Han JS, Bachle M, Butz F. Biomechanical and histological behavior of zirconia implants: an experiment in the rat. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:333-9.   DOI
30 Lee J, Sieweke JH, Rodriguez NA, Schupbach P, Lindstrom H, Susin C, Wikesjo UM. Evaluation of nano-technology-modified zirconia oral implants: a study in rabbits. J Clin Periodontol 2009;36:610-7.   DOI
31 Rocchietta I, Fontana F, Addis A, Schupbach P, Simion M. Surface-modified zirconia implants: tissue response in rabbits. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:844-50.   DOI
32 Kohal RJ, Bachle M, Att W, Chaar S, Altmann B, Renz A, Butz F. Osteoblast and bone tissue response to surface modified zirconia and titanium implant materials. Dent Mater 2013;29:763-76.   DOI
33 Gahlert M, Gudehus T, Eichhorn S, Steinhauser E, Kniha H, Erhardt W. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18:662-8.   DOI
34 Ito H, Sasaki H, Saito K, Honma S, Yajima Y, Yoshinari M. Response of osteoblast-like cells to zirconia with different surface topography. Dent Mater J 2013;32:122-9.   DOI
35 Moller B, Terheyden H, Acil Y, Purcz NM, Hertrampf K, Tabakov A, Behrens E, Wiltfang J. A comparison of biocompatibility and osseointegration of ceramic and titanium implants: an in vivo and in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012;41:638-45.   DOI
36 Lorusso F, Noumbissi S, Francesco I, Rapone B, Khater AGA, Scarano A. Scientific Trends in Clinical Research on Zirconia Dental Implants: A Bibliometric Review. Materials 2020;13:5534.   DOI
37 Zechner W, Tangl S, Furst G, Tepper G, Thams U, Mailath G, Watzek G. Osseous healing characteristics of three different implant types. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:150-7.   DOI
38 Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. Oral implant surfaces: Part 2 - review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:544-64.