Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2020.36.4.242

Accuracy of dies fabricated by various three dimensional printing systems: a comparative study  

Baek, Ju Won (Dental Clinic Center, ChungBuk National University Hospital)
Shin, Soo-Yeon (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Publication Information
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science / v.36, no.4, 2020 , pp. 242-253 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of dies fabricated using 3D printing system to conventional method and to evaluate overall volumetric changes by arranging the superimposed surfaces. Materials and Methods: A mandibular right first molar from a dental model was prepared, scanned and fabricated with composites of polyetherketoneketone (PEKK). Master dies were classified into 4 groups. For the conventional method, the impression was taken with polyvinylsiloxane and the impression was poured with Type IV dental stone. For the 3D printing, the standard die was scanned and converted into models using three different 3D printers. Each of four methods was used to make 10 specimens. Scanned files were superimposed with the standard die by using 3D surface matching software. For statistical analysis, Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test were done (P < 0.05). Results: Compared to the standard model, the volumetric changes of dies fabricated by each method were significantly different except the models fabricated by conventional method and 3D printer of Stereolithography (P < 0.05). The conventional dies showed the lowest volumetric change than 3D printed dies (P < 0.05). 3D printed dies fabricated by Stereolithography showed the lowest volumetric change among the different 3D printers (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The conventional dies were more accurate than 3D printed dies, though 3D printed dies were within clinically acceptable range. Thus, 3D printed dies can be used for fabricating restorations.
Keywords
die; stone; 3D printer; Stereolithography; accuracy;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Stansbury JW, Idacavage MJ. 3D printing with polymers: Challenges among expanding options and opportunities. Dent Mater 2016;32:54-64.   DOI
2 Sun J, Zhang FQ. The application of rapid prototyping in prosthodontics. J Prosthodont 2012;21:641-4.   DOI
3 van Noort R. The future of dental devices is digital. Dent Mater 2012;28:3-12.   DOI
4 Ian G, David R, Brent S. Additive manufacturing technologies: 3d printing, rapid prototyping, and direct digital manufacturing. 2nd ed. New York; Springer; 2015.
5 Faber J, Berto PM, Quaresma M. Rapid prototyping as a tool for diagnosis and treatment planning for maxillary canine impaction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:583-9.   DOI
6 Marshall B. Automated fabrication: improving productivity in manufacturing. 1st ed. Englewood Cliffs; Prentice Hall; 1993.
7 Kruth JP, Leu MC, Nakagawa T. Progress in additive manufacturing and rapid prototyping. CIRP Annals 1998;47:525-40.   DOI
8 Chua CK, Leong KF. Rapid prototyping: principles and applications in manufacturing. 1st ed. New York; Wiley; 1998.
9 Pham DT, Gault RS. A comparison of rapid prototyping technologies. Int J Mach Tools Manufac 1998;38:1257-87.   DOI
10 Kwak KH, Park SH. Trend of the global 3D printing industry technology. JKSME 2013;53:58-60.
11 Hull CW. Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. US Patent 4575330. 1986.
12 Chang PS, Parker TH, Patrick CW Jr., Miller MJ. The accuracy of stereolithography in planning craniofacial bone replacement. J Craniofac Surg 2003;14:164-70.   DOI
13 Ibrahim D, Broilo TL, Heitz C, de Oliveira MG, de Oliveira HW, Nobre SM, Dos Santos Filho JH, Silva DN. Dimensional error of selective laser sintering, three-dimensional printing and PolyJet models in the reproduction of mandibular anatomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2009;37:167-73.   DOI
14 Wu GH, Hsu SH. Review: Polymeric-Based 3D Printing for Tissue Engineering. J Med Biol Eng 2015;35:285-92.   DOI
15 Hazeveld A, Huddleston Slater JJ, Ren Y. Accuracy and reproducibility of dental replica models reconstructed by different rapid prototyping techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145:108-15.   DOI
16 Chua CK, Leong KF. 3D printing and additive manufacturing: principles and applications. 4th ed. Singapre; World Scientific; 2014.
17 Nandini Y, Vinitha KB, Manvi S, Smitha M. Comparison of dimensional accuracy of four different die materials before and after disinfection of the impression: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14:668-74.   DOI
18 Bailey JH, Donovan TE, Preston JD. The dimensional accuracy of improved dental stone, silverplated, and epoxy resin die materials. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:307-10.   DOI
19 Salmi M, Paloheimo KS, Tuomi J, Wolff J, Makitie A. Accuracy of medical models made by additive manufacturing (rapid manufacturing). J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2013;41:603-9.   DOI
20 Valderhaug J, Floystrand F. Dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials in custom-made and stock trays. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:514-7.   DOI
21 Artopoulos A, Juszczyk AS, Rodriguez JM, Clark RK, Radford DR. Three-dimensional processing deformation of three denture base materials. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110:481-7.   DOI
22 Newman A, Williams JD. Die materials for inlay, crown and bridge work. Br Dent J 1969;127:415-20.
23 Murugesan K, Anandapandian PA, Sharma SK, Vasantha Kumar M. Comparative evaluation of dimension and surface detail accuracy of models produced by three different rapid prototype techniques. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2012;12:16-20.   DOI
24 Bloem TJ, Czerniawski B, Luke J, Lang BR. Determination of the accuracy of three die systems. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:758-62.   DOI
25 Derrien G, Sturtz G. Comparison of transverse strength and dimensional variations between die stone, die epoxy resin, and die polyurethane resin. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:569-74.   DOI
26 Kenyon BJ, Hagge MS, Leknius C, Daniels WC, Weed ST. Dimensional accuracy of 7 die materials. J Prosthodont 2005;14:25-31.   DOI
27 Millstein PL. Determining the accuracy of gypsum casts made from type IV dental stone. J Oral Rehabil 1992;19:239-43.   DOI
28 Minneci C, Mello AM, Mossello E, Baldasseroni S, Macchi L, Cipolletti S, Marchionni N, Di Bari M. Comparative study of four physical performance measures as predictors of death, incident disability, and falls in unselected older persons: the insufficienza Cardiaca negli Anziani Residenti a Dicomano Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2015;63:136-41.   DOI
29 Lee H. Use of the personal computer to design processing conditions for improving dental die accuracy. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:141-5.   DOI
30 Brukl CE, McConnell RM, Norling BK, Collard SM. Influence of gauging water composition on dental stone expansion and setting time. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:218-23.   DOI
31 Ender A, Mehl A. Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions - an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 2011;14:11-21.
32 Duke P, Moore BK, Haug SP, Andres CJ. Study of the physical properties of type IV gypsum, resincontaining, and epoxy die materials. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:466-73.   DOI
33 Derrien G, Le Menn G. Evaluation of detail reproduction for three die materials by using scanning electron microscopy and two-dimensional profilometry. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:1-7.   DOI
34 Nomura GT, Reisbick MH, Preston JD. An investigation of epoxy resin dies. J Prosthet Dent 1980;44:45-50.   DOI
35 Caputi S, Varvara G. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:274-81.   DOI
36 Walker MP, Ries D, Borello B. Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:669-74.
37 Wostmann B, Rehmann P, Balkenhol M. Accuracy of impressions obtained with dual-arch trays. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22:158-60.
38 Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505-11.   DOI
39 Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB. Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2008;29:494, 496, 498-505.
40 Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140:1301-4.   DOI
41 Keating AP, Knox J, Bibb R, Zhurov AI. A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy. J Orthod 2008;35:191-201; discussion 175.   DOI
42 Gordon GE, Johnson GH, Drennon DG. The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:12-5.   DOI
43 Rudolph H, Luthardt RG, Walter MH. Computeraided analysis of the influence of digitizing and surfacing on the accuracy in dental CAD/CAM technology. Comput Biol Med 2007;37:579-87.   DOI
44 Ziegler M. Digital impression taking with reproducibly high precision. Int J Comput Dent 2009;12:159-63.
45 International Organization for Standardization (1998). Dental gypsum products (ISO Standard No. 6873).
46 Lee KY, Cho JW, Chang NY, Chae JM, Kang KH, Kim SC, Cho JH. Accuracy of three-dimensional printing for manufacturing replica teeth. Korean J Orthod 2015;45:217-25.   DOI
47 Kasparova M, Grafova L, Dvorak P, Dostalova T, Prochazka A, Eliasova H, Prusa J, Kakawand S. Possibility of reconstruction of dental plaster casts from 3D digital study models. Biomed Eng Online 2013;12:49.   DOI