Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2020.36.4.211

Concept and application of implant connection systems: Part I. Placement and restoration of internal conical connection implant  

Ko, Kyung-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Kang, Hyeon-Goo (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Huh, Yoon-Hyuk (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Park, Chan-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Cho, Lee-Ra (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science / v.36, no.4, 2020 , pp. 211-221 More about this Journal
Abstract
The typical biomechanical properties of an internal conical connection (ICC) are axial displacement and loss of preload. The axial displacement of an ICC without a vertical stop can cause the loss of preload and a lowered occlusion. The stress of an ICC is concentrated on the contact interface of the abutment and not on the screw, and during placement, it is important to choose a wider coronal wall thickness as much as possible. The ICC should also be placed below the level of the bone crest. During the restoration of an ICC, care should be taken to ensure an appropriate abutment shape and an accurate connection. To get the best clinical results, it is important to select its wall thickness and place it in the appropriate position to restore it adequately.
Keywords
internal conical connection; axial displacement; preload; restoration; placement;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 5  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Hansson S. The implant neck: smooth or provided with retention elements. A biomechanical approach. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999;10:394-405.   DOI
2 Monje A, Galindo-Moreno P, Tozum TF, SuarezLopez del Amo F, Wang H. Into the Paradigm of Local Factors as Contributors for Peri-implant Disease: Short Communication. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016;31:288-92.
3 Ko KH, Park JH, Cho LR. Considerations for fabrication of cad-cam abutments: Part I. Selection of titanium block and fabrication process. Implantology 2019;23:46-58.   DOI
4 Ko KH, Park JH, Cho LR. Considerations for fabrication of cad-cam abutments: Part II. Designing abutment. Implantology 2019;23:112-25.   DOI
5 Blanco J, Pico A, Caneiro L, Novoa L, Batalla P, Martin-Lancharro P. Effect of abutment height on interproximal implant bone level in the early healing: A randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29:108-17.
6 Zabler S, Rack T, Rack A, Nelson K. Fatigue induced deformation of taper connection in dental titanium implants. Int J Mat Res 2012;103:207-16.   DOI
7 Bozkaya D, Muftu S. Mechanics of the tapered interference fit in dental implants. J Biomech 2003;36:1649-58.   DOI
8 Baixe S, Fauxpoint G, Arntz Y, Etienne O. Microgap between zirconia abutments and titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:455-60.
9 Teoh SH, Thampuran R, Seah KHW, Goh JCH. The development of P/M titanium-graphite triphasic composites for biomedical applications. J Mater Sci Ltr 1997;16:639-41.   DOI
10 Cho WR, Huh YH, Park CJ, Cho LR. Effect of cyclic loading and retightening on reverse torque value in external and internal implants. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:288-93.   DOI
11 Jeon BS, Kim SK, Lee JJ, Seo JM. Possibility and limitation of applying occlusal adjustment on implant prosthesis similar to natural teeth. Implantology 2018;22:162-72.   DOI
12 Theoharidou A, Petridis HP, Tzannas K, Garefis P. Abutment screw loosening in single-implant restorations: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:681-90.
13 Coppede AR, de Mattos MG, Rodrigues RCS, Ribeiro RF. Effect of repeated torque/mechanical loading cycles on two different abutment types in implants with internal tapered connections: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:624-32.   DOI
14 Jimbo R, Halldin A, Janda M, Wennerberg A, Vandeweghe S. Vertical fracture and marginal bone loss of internal-connection implants: a finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:e171-6.   DOI
15 Rack T, Zabler S, Rack A, Riesemeier H, Nelson K. An in vitro pilot study of abutment stability during loading in new and fatigue-loaded conical dental implants using synchrotron-based radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:44-50.   DOI
16 Cho SY, Huh YH, Park CJ, Cho LR. Three-dimensional finite element analysis on stress distribution of internal implant-abutment engagement features. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2018;33:319-27.   DOI
17 Piermatti J, Yousef H, Luke A, Mahevich R, Weiner S. An in vitro analysis of implant screw torque loss with external hex and internal connection implant systems. Implant Dent 2006;15:427-35.   DOI
18 Merz BR, Hunenbart S, Belser UC. Mechanics of the implant-abutment connection: an 8-degree taper compared to a butt joint connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:519-26.
19 Pessoa RS, Muraru L, Junior EM, Vaz LG, Sloten JV, Duyck J, Jaecques SVN. Influence of implant connection type on the biomechanical environment of immediately placed implants - CT-based nonlinear, three-dimensional finite element analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2010;12:219-34.
20 Cho SY, Huh YH, Park CJ, Cho LR. ThreeDimensional Finite Element Analysis of the Stress Distribution at the Internal Implant-Abutment Connection. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2016;36:e49-58.
21 Yi Y, Koak JY, Kim SK, Lee SJ, Heo SJ. Comparison of implant component fractures in external and internal type: A 12-year retrospective study. J Adv Prosthodont 2018;10:155-62.   DOI
22 Cha HS, Kim YS, Jeon JH, Lee JH. Cumulative survival rate and complication rates of single-tooth implant; focused on the coronal fracture of fixture in the internal connection implant. J Oral Rehabil 2013;40:595-602.   DOI
23 Lee JH, Huh YH, Park CJ, Cho LR. Effect of the Coronal Wall Thickness of Dental Implants on the Screw Joint Stability in the Internal Implant-Abutment Connection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016;31:1058-65.
24 Lee JH, Lee W, Huh YH, Park CJ, Cho LR. Impact of Intentional Overload on Joint Stability of Internal Implant-Abutment Connection System with Different Diameter. J Prosthodont 2019;28:e649-56.   DOI
25 Parpaiola A, Cecchinato D, Toia M, Bressan E, Speroni S, Lindhe J. Dimensions of the healthy gingiva and peri-implant mucosa. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015;26:657-62.   DOI
26 Lindhe J, Berglundh T. The interface between the mucosa and the implant. Periodontol 2000 1998;17:47-54.   DOI
27 Levine RA, Clem DS 3rd, Wilson TG Jr., Higginbottom F, Solnit G. Multicenter retrospective analysis of the ITI implant system used for single-tooth replacements: results of loading for 2 or more years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:516-20.
28 Bonfante EA, Coelho PG. A critical perspective on mechanical testing of implants and prostheses. Adv Dent Res 2016;28:18-27.   DOI
29 Sutter F, Weingart D, Mundwiler U, Sutter FJ, Asikainen P. ITI implants in combination with bone grafts: design and biomechanical aspects. Clin Oral Implants Res 1994;5:164-72.   DOI
30 Norton MR. An in vitro evaluation of the strength of an internal conical interface compared to a butt joint interface in implant design. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:290-8.   DOI
31 Baggi L, Cappelloni I, Di Girolamo M, Maceri F, Vairo G. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a threedimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2008;100:422-31.   DOI
32 Weng D, Nagata MJ, Bell M, Bosco AF, de Melo LGN, Richter E. Influence of microgap location and configuration on the periimplant bone morphology in submerged implants. An experimental study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:1141-7.   DOI
33 Weng D, Nagata MJH, Bell M, de Melo LGN, Bosco AF. Influence of microgap location and configuration on peri-implant bone morphology in nonsubmerged implants: an experimental study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010;25:540-7.
34 Lee JH, Kim DG, Park CJ, Cho LR. Axial displacements in external and internal implant-abutment connection. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:e83-9.   DOI
35 Seol HW, Heo SJ, Koak JY, Kim SK, Kim SK. Axial displacement of external and internal implantabutment connection evaluated by linear mixed model analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015;30:1387-99.   DOI
36 Braian M, De Bruyn H, Fransson H, Christersson C, Wennerberg A. Tolerance measurements on internal- and external-hexagon implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:846-52.   DOI
37 Winkler S, Ring K, Ring JD, Boberick KG. Implant screw mechanics and the settling effect: overview. J Oral Implantol 2003;29:242-5.   DOI
38 Bulaqi HA, Mashhadi MM, Safari H, Samandari MM, Geramipanah F. Dynamic nature of abutment screw retightening: finite element study of the effect of retightening on the settling effect. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:412-9.   DOI