1 |
Jemt T, Hjalmarsson L. In vitro measurements of precision of fit of implant-supported frameworks. A comparison between "virtual" and "physical" assessments of fit using two different techniques of measurements. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2012;14 Suppl 1:e175-82.
DOI
|
2 |
Gonzalez de Villaumbrosia P, Martinez-Rus F, Garcia-Orejas A, Salido MP, Pradies G. In vitro comparison of the accuracy (trueness and precision) of six extraoral dental scanners with different scanning technologies. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:543-50.
DOI
|
3 |
Quimby ML, Vig KW, Rashid RG, Firestone AR. The accuracy and reliability of measurements made on computer-based digital models. Angle Orthod 2004;74:298-303.
|
4 |
Menditto A, Patriarca M, Magnusson B. Understanding the meaning of accuracy, trueness and precision. Accredit Qual Assur 2006;12:45-7.
DOI
|
5 |
Mai HN, Lee KE, Ha JH, Lee DH. Effects of image and education on the precision of the measurement method for evaluating prosthesis misfit. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:600-5.
DOI
|
6 |
Kim JE, Amelya A, Shin Y, Shim JS. Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions using an artificial landmark. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:755-61.
DOI
|
7 |
Jiang T, Lee SM, Hou Y, Chang X, Hwang HS. Evaluation of digital dental models obtained from dental cone-beam computed tomography scan of alginate impressions. Korean J Orthod 2016;46:129-36.
DOI
|
8 |
Joo YH, Lee JH. Three dimensional accuracy analysis of dental stone casts fabricated using irreversible hydrocolloid impressions. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2015;31:316-28.
DOI
|
9 |
Guth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, Edelhoff D. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1201-8.
DOI
|
10 |
Lee JH, Paik KS, Chang MS, Lee SP. An evaluation of validity of measurements using digital caliper and three-dimensional virtual dental models. Korean J Anat 2004;37:209-18.
|
11 |
Renne W, Ludlow M, Fryml J, Schurch Z, Mennito A, Kessler R, Lauer A. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: an in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:36-42.
DOI
|
12 |
Goodacre BJ, Goodacre CJ, Baba NZ, Kattadiyil MT. Comparison of denture base adaptation between CAD-CAM and conventional fabrication techniques. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:249-56.
DOI
|
13 |
Ender A, Zimmermann M, Attin T, Mehl A. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions. Clin Oral Investig 2016;20:1495-504.
DOI
|
14 |
Maeng J, Lim YJ, Kim B, Kim MJ, Kwon HB. A new approach to accuracy evaluation of singletooth abutment using two-dimensional analysis in two intraoral scanners. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16. pii. E1021.
|
15 |
Patzelt SB, Vonau S, Stampf S, Att W. Assessing the feasibility and accuracy of digitizing edentulous jaws. J Am Dent Assoc 2013;144:914-20.
DOI
|
16 |
Norvell NG, Korioth TV, Cagna DR, Versluis A. Comparison of digital surface displacements of maxillary dentures based on noninvasive anatomic landmarks. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:123-31.
DOI
|
17 |
Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wostmann B. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:1759-64.
DOI
|
18 |
Ender A, Attin T, Mehl A. In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods of obtaining complete-arch dental impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:313-20.
DOI
|
19 |
Ender A, Mehl A. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision. J Prosthet Dent 2013;109:121-8.
DOI
|
20 |
Kim JH, Kim KB, Kim WC, Kim JH, Kim HY. Accuracy and precision of polyurethane dental arch models fabricated using a three-dimensional subtractive rapid prototyping method with an intraoral scanning technique. Korean J Orthod 2014;44:69-76.
DOI
|