Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2018.34.4.306

Esthetic anterior restoration using 3M LavaTM Esthetic monolithic zirconia  

Kim, Hyung Joon (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Shin, Soo-Yeon (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Publication Information
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science / v.34, no.4, 2018 , pp. 306-316 More about this Journal
Abstract
Monolithic zirconia has been widely used in fixed partial dentures due to high strength and fracture toughness. Nevertheless, the usage of monolithic zirconia in anterior restoration was limited because of opacity. Recently, esthetic monolithic zirconia blocks are developed by improving translucency and using various shading systems. Manufacturer introduces 3M $Lava^{TM}$ Esthetic with increased cubic phase and fluorescent ingredients is more esthetic than previous monolithic zirconia. This case report describes favorable anterior restorations using translucent monolithic zirconia.
Keywords
monolithic zirconia; 3M $Lava^{TM}$ Esthetic; anterior restoration; translucency;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bagby M, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW Jr. Metal ceramic compatibility: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:21-5.   DOI
2 Isgro G, Pallav P, van der Zel JM, Feilzer AJ. The influence of the veneering porcelain and different surface treatments on the biaxial flexural strength of a heat-pressed ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:465-73.   DOI
3 Kim HK, Kim SH, Lee JB, Han JS, Yeo IS, Ha SR. Effect of the amount of thickness reduction on color and translucency of dental monolithic zirconia ceramics. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:37-42.   DOI
4 Teichmann M, Wienert AL, Ruckbeil M, Weber V, Wolfart S, Edelhoff D. Ten-year survival and chipping rates and clinical quality grading of zirconiabased fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22:2905-15.   DOI
5 Stefanescu C, Ionita C, Nechita V, Drafta S, Oancea L, Petre A. Survival Rates and Complications for Zirconia-Based Fixed Dental Prostheses in a Period up to 10 Years: A Systematic Review. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2018;26:54-61.
6 Kwon SJ, Lawson NC, McLaren EE, Nejat AH, Burgess JO. Comparison of the mechanical properties of translucent zirconia and lithium disilicate. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:132-7.   DOI
7 Tuncel I, Turp I, Usumez A. Evaluation of translucency of monolithic zirconia and framework zirconia materials. J Adv Prosthodont 2016;8:181-6.   DOI
8 Silva LHD, Lima E, Miranda RBP, Favero SS, Lohbauer U, Cesar PF. Dental ceramics: a review of new materials and processing methods. Braz Oral Res 2017;31:e58.
9 Zhang Y. Making yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia translucent. Dent Mater 2014;30:1195-203.   DOI
10 Huh YH, Yang EC, Park CJ, Cho LR. In vitro evaluation of the polishing effect and optical properties of monolithic zirconia. J Prosthet Dent 2018;119:994-9.   DOI
11 Tabatabaian F, Dalirani S, Namdari M. Effect of Thickness of Zirconia Ceramic on Its Masking Ability: An In Vitro Study. J Prosthodont 2017 Apr 28. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12625. [Epub ahead of print]
12 Yang DH, Yang HS, Park SW, Lim HP, Yun KD, Vang MS. Full mouth implant rehabilitation with double scanning of provisional restoration. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2014;52:252-7.   DOI
13 Hack GD, Sebastian B, Patzelt M. Evaluation of the accuracy of six intraoral scanning devices: An in-vitro investigation. ADA Professional Product Review 2015;10:1-5.
14 Renne W, Ludlow M, Fryml J, Schurch Z, Mennito A, Kessler R, Lauer A. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:36-42.   DOI