Considerations in the reliability of occlusal indicators and occlusal contact marks
![]() |
Kim, hang-Hwan
(Department of Prosthodontics & Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Kim, Dae-Gon (Department of Prosthodontics & Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) Ko, Kyung-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics & Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) Huh, Yoon-Hyuk (Department of Prosthodontics & Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) Cho, Lee-La (Department of Prosthodontics & Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) Park, Chan-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics & Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) |
1 | Carey JP, Craig M, Kerstein RB, Radke J. Determining a relationship between applied occlusal load and articulating paper mark area. Open Dent J 2007;1:1-7. DOI |
2 | Saad MN, Weiner G, Ehrenberg D, Weiner S. Effects of load and indicator type upon occlusal contact markings. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;85:18-22. |
3 | Reiber T, Fuhr K, Hartmann H, Leicher D. Recording occlusal indicators. Introduction to occlusal surface materials and roughness. ZWR 1989;98:756-61. |
4 | Qadeer S, Kerstein R, Kim RJ, Huh JB, Shin SW. Relationship between articulation paper mark size and percentage of force measured with computerized occlusal analysis. J Adv Prosthodont 2012;4:7-12. DOI |
5 | Kerstein RB, Radke J. Clinician accuracy when subjectively interpreting articulating paper markings. Cranio 2014;32:13-23. DOI |
6 | Sutter BA. A digital poll of dentists testing the accuracy of paper mark subjective interpretation. Cranio 2017;9:1-8. |
7 | Reiber T, Fuhr K, Hartmann H, Leicher D. Recording pattern of occlusal indicators. I. Influence of indicator thickness, pressure, and surface morphology. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1989;44:90-3. |
8 | Anderson GC, Schulte JK, Aeppli DM. Reliability of the evaluation of occlusal contacts in the intercuspal position. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:320-3. DOI |
9 | Harper KA, Setchell DJ. The use of shimstock to assess occlusal contacts: a laboratory study. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:347-52. |
10 | Maness WL. Laboratory comparison of three occlusal registration methods for identification of induced interceptive contacts. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:483-7. DOI |
11 | Schelb E, Kaiser DA, Brukl CE. Thickness and marking characteristics of occlusal registration strips. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:122-6. DOI |
12 |
Cerna M, Ferreira R, Zaror C, Navarro P, Sandoval P. Validity and reliability of the |
13 | Gazit E, Fitzig S, Lieberman MA. Reproducibility of occlusal marking techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:505-9. DOI |
14 | Kerstein RB, Lowe M, Harty M, Radke J. A force reproduction analysis of two recording sensors of a computerized occlusal analysis system. Cranio 2006;24:15-24. DOI |
15 | Throckmorton GS, Rasmussen J, Caloss R. Calibration of T-Scan sensors for recording bite forces in denture patients. J Oral Rehabil 2009;36:636-43. DOI |
16 | Augusti D, Augusti G, Re D, Dellavia C, Gianni AB. Effect of different dental articulating papers on SEMG activity during maximum clenching. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2015;25:612-8. DOI |
17 | Korioth TW. Number and location of occlusal contacts in intercuspal position. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:206-10. DOI |
18 | Helms RB, Katona TR, Eckert GJ. Do occlusal contact detection products alter the occlusion? J Oral Rehabil 2012;39:357-63. DOI |
19 | Toledo MF, Joias RP, Marques-Iasi YS, Neves AC, Rode Sde M. Thickness and marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips. J Appl Oral Sci 2014;22:516-21. DOI |
20 | Mitchem JA, Katona TR, Moser EAS. Does the presence of an occlusal indicator product affect the contact forces between full dentitions? J Oral Rehabil 2017;44:791-9. DOI |
21 | Malta Barbosa J, Urtula AB, Hirata R, Carames J. Thickness evaluation of articulating papers and foils. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018;30:70-2. DOI |
22 | Zuccari AG, Oshida Y, Okamura M, Paez CY, Moore BK. Bulge ductility of several occlusal contact measuring paper-based sheets. Biomed Mater Eng 1997;7:265-70. |
23 | Dawson PE. Functional occlusion: from TMJ to smile design. 1st ed. Philadelphia; Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006. p.394-417. |
24 | McNeill C. Science and practice of occlusion. 1st ed. Illinois; Quintessence Publishing; 1997. p.404-18. |
25 | Okeson JP. Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. 7th ed. Philadelphia; Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014. p.443-56. |
26 | Saracoglu A, Ozpinar B. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of occlusal indicator sensitivity. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:522-6. DOI |
27 | Sharma A, Rahul GR, Poduval ST, Shetty K, Gupta B, Rajora V. History of materials used for recording static and dynamic occlusal contact marks: a literature review. J Clin Exp Dent 2013;5:e48-53. |
28 | Forrester SE, Presswood RG, Toy AC, Pain MT. Occlusal measurement method can affect SEMG activity during occlusion. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:655-60. DOI |
29 | Halperin GC, Halperin AR, Norling BK. Thickness, strength, and plastic deformation of occlusal registration strips. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:575-8. DOI |
30 | Carossa S, Lojacono A. Schierano G, Pera P. Evaluation of occlusal contacts in the dental laboratory: influence of strip thickness and operator experience. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:201-4. |
31 | Brizuela-Velasco A, Alvarez-Arenal A, Ellakuria-Echevarria J, del Rio-Highsmith J, Santamaria-Arrieta G, Martin-Bianco N. Influence of articulating paper thickness on occlusal contacts registration: a preliminary report. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28:360-2. DOI |
32 | Millstein P, Maya A. An evaluation of occlusal contact marking indicators: a descriptive quantitative method. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:1280-6. DOI |
![]() |