Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2018.34.3.147

Considerations in the reliability of occlusal indicators and occlusal contact marks  

Kim, hang-Hwan (Department of Prosthodontics & Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Kim, Dae-Gon (Department of Prosthodontics & Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Ko, Kyung-Ho (Department of Prosthodontics & Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Huh, Yoon-Hyuk (Department of Prosthodontics & Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Cho, Lee-La (Department of Prosthodontics & Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Park, Chan-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics & Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science / v.34, no.3, 2018 , pp. 147-156 More about this Journal
Abstract
On the reliability of occlusal contact marks with occlusal indicators, it must be important to consider the affecting results of using methods. With affecting the accuracy and validity of results, there are many variables such as thickness and material of indicator, occlusal force, number of usage and etc. Nevertheless, researches on the occlusal contact marks have limited to focusing thickness of indicators and occlusal force. For the control of variables, it is clinically recommended to do use new indicators in every trial and to secure dry condition and to use thinner ones. In addition, alternatives might be helpful to understand more appropriate results.
Keywords
occlusal contact; occlusal indicator; reliability; accuracy; validity;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Carey JP, Craig M, Kerstein RB, Radke J. Determining a relationship between applied occlusal load and articulating paper mark area. Open Dent J 2007;1:1-7.   DOI
2 Saad MN, Weiner G, Ehrenberg D, Weiner S. Effects of load and indicator type upon occlusal contact markings. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008;85:18-22.
3 Reiber T, Fuhr K, Hartmann H, Leicher D. Recording occlusal indicators. Introduction to occlusal surface materials and roughness. ZWR 1989;98:756-61.
4 Qadeer S, Kerstein R, Kim RJ, Huh JB, Shin SW. Relationship between articulation paper mark size and percentage of force measured with computerized occlusal analysis. J Adv Prosthodont 2012;4:7-12.   DOI
5 Kerstein RB, Radke J. Clinician accuracy when subjectively interpreting articulating paper markings. Cranio 2014;32:13-23.   DOI
6 Sutter BA. A digital poll of dentists testing the accuracy of paper mark subjective interpretation. Cranio 2017;9:1-8.
7 Reiber T, Fuhr K, Hartmann H, Leicher D. Recording pattern of occlusal indicators. I. Influence of indicator thickness, pressure, and surface morphology. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1989;44:90-3.
8 Anderson GC, Schulte JK, Aeppli DM. Reliability of the evaluation of occlusal contacts in the intercuspal position. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:320-3.   DOI
9 Harper KA, Setchell DJ. The use of shimstock to assess occlusal contacts: a laboratory study. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:347-52.
10 Maness WL. Laboratory comparison of three occlusal registration methods for identification of induced interceptive contacts. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:483-7.   DOI
11 Schelb E, Kaiser DA, Brukl CE. Thickness and marking characteristics of occlusal registration strips. J Prosthet Dent 1985;54:122-6.   DOI
12 Cerna M, Ferreira R, Zaror C, Navarro P, Sandoval P. Validity and reliability of the $T-Scan^{(R)}$ III for measuring force under laboratory conditions. J Oral Rehabil 2015;42:544-51.   DOI
13 Gazit E, Fitzig S, Lieberman MA. Reproducibility of occlusal marking techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1986;55:505-9.   DOI
14 Kerstein RB, Lowe M, Harty M, Radke J. A force reproduction analysis of two recording sensors of a computerized occlusal analysis system. Cranio 2006;24:15-24.   DOI
15 Throckmorton GS, Rasmussen J, Caloss R. Calibration of T-Scan sensors for recording bite forces in denture patients. J Oral Rehabil 2009;36:636-43.   DOI
16 Augusti D, Augusti G, Re D, Dellavia C, Gianni AB. Effect of different dental articulating papers on SEMG activity during maximum clenching. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 2015;25:612-8.   DOI
17 Korioth TW. Number and location of occlusal contacts in intercuspal position. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:206-10.   DOI
18 Helms RB, Katona TR, Eckert GJ. Do occlusal contact detection products alter the occlusion? J Oral Rehabil 2012;39:357-63.   DOI
19 Toledo MF, Joias RP, Marques-Iasi YS, Neves AC, Rode Sde M. Thickness and marking quality of different occlusal contact registration strips. J Appl Oral Sci 2014;22:516-21.   DOI
20 Mitchem JA, Katona TR, Moser EAS. Does the presence of an occlusal indicator product affect the contact forces between full dentitions? J Oral Rehabil 2017;44:791-9.   DOI
21 Malta Barbosa J, Urtula AB, Hirata R, Carames J. Thickness evaluation of articulating papers and foils. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018;30:70-2.   DOI
22 Zuccari AG, Oshida Y, Okamura M, Paez CY, Moore BK. Bulge ductility of several occlusal contact measuring paper-based sheets. Biomed Mater Eng 1997;7:265-70.
23 Dawson PE. Functional occlusion: from TMJ to smile design. 1st ed. Philadelphia; Elsevier Health Sciences; 2006. p.394-417.
24 McNeill C. Science and practice of occlusion. 1st ed. Illinois; Quintessence Publishing; 1997. p.404-18.
25 Okeson JP. Management of temporomandibular disorders and occlusion. 7th ed. Philadelphia; Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014. p.443-56.
26 Saracoglu A, Ozpinar B. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of occlusal indicator sensitivity. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:522-6.   DOI
27 Sharma A, Rahul GR, Poduval ST, Shetty K, Gupta B, Rajora V. History of materials used for recording static and dynamic occlusal contact marks: a literature review. J Clin Exp Dent 2013;5:e48-53.
28 Forrester SE, Presswood RG, Toy AC, Pain MT. Occlusal measurement method can affect SEMG activity during occlusion. J Oral Rehabil 2011;38:655-60.   DOI
29 Halperin GC, Halperin AR, Norling BK. Thickness, strength, and plastic deformation of occlusal registration strips. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:575-8.   DOI
30 Carossa S, Lojacono A. Schierano G, Pera P. Evaluation of occlusal contacts in the dental laboratory: influence of strip thickness and operator experience. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:201-4.
31 Brizuela-Velasco A, Alvarez-Arenal A, Ellakuria-Echevarria J, del Rio-Highsmith J, Santamaria-Arrieta G, Martin-Bianco N. Influence of articulating paper thickness on occlusal contacts registration: a preliminary report. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28:360-2.   DOI
32 Millstein P, Maya A. An evaluation of occlusal contact marking indicators: a descriptive quantitative method. J Am Dent Assoc 2001;132:1280-6.   DOI