Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2018.34.2.72

Influence of water absorption on flexural strength and elastic modulus in several resinous teeth splinting materials  

Park, Bae-Young (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University School of Dentistry)
Kim, Soo-Yeon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University School of Dentistry)
Kim, Jin-Woo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University School of Dentistry)
Park, Se-Hee (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University School of Dentistry)
Cho, Kyung-Mo (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University School of Dentistry)
Publication Information
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science / v.34, no.2, 2018 , pp. 72-79 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare flexural strength and elastic modulus of several splinting materials dependent on water absorption. Materials and Methods: Three different materials; LightFix, G-FIX, G-aenial Universal Flo; were used in this study. Thirty rectangular bar specimens ($25{\times}2{\times}2mm$) of each materials were prepared. Fifteen specimens of each materials were stored in 100% relative humidity atmosphere, $37^{\circ}C$ for 24 hours. The other specimens were stored in distilled water, $37^{\circ}C$ for 30 days. Flexural strength and elastic modulus were calculated using Universal testing machine. One-way ANOVA and Scheffe's post hoc test at 95% level of significance were used on all test results. Results: In LightFix, flexural strength and elastic modulus were significantly decreased after aging. In G-FIX, there was no significant change in flexural strength and elastic modulus after aging. In G-aenial Universal Flo, flexural strength was significantly decreased, but elastic modulus did not change significantly. Statistical analysis reveals that flexural strength and elastic modulus increased in the order of LightFix, G-FIX, G-aenial Flo in both 24 hours and 30 days. Conclusion: It could be deduced from this study that flexural strength and elastic modulus of some resins could be changed when it aged in oral environment. Thus this should be considered when choosing a resin to perform a resin-bonded splint.
Keywords
aging; elastic modulus; flexural strength; splint; tooth mobility;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Da Fonte Porto Carreiro A, Dos Santos Cruz C, Vergani CE. Hardness and compressive strength of indirect composite resins: effects of immersion in distilled water. J Oral Rehabil 2004;31:1085-9.   DOI
2 International Organization for Standardization. Dentistry-Polymer-based restorative material. ISO 4049, 2009.
3 de Melo Monteiro GQ, Montes MA. Evaluation of linear polymerization shrinkage, flexural strength and modulus of elasticity of dental composites. Mat Res 2010;13:51-5.   DOI
4 Hofmann N, Papsthart G, Hugo B, Klaiber B. Comparison of photo-activation versus chemical or dual-curing of resin-based luting cements regarding fexural strength, modulus and surface hardness. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:1022-8.   DOI
5 Oysaed H, Ruyter IE. Composites for use in posterior teeth: mechanical properties tested under dry and wet conditions. J Biomed Mater Res 1986;20:261-71.   DOI
6 Dickens SH, Stansbury JW, Choi KM, Floyd CJE. Photopolymerization kinetics of methacrylate dental resins. Macromolecules 2003;36:6043-53.   DOI
7 Rueggeberg FA. From vulcanite to vinyl, a history of resins in restorative dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:364-79.   DOI
8 Atai M, Watts DC. A new kinetic model for the photopolymerization shrinkage-strain of dental composites and resin-monomers. Dent Mater 2006; 22:785-91.   DOI
9 Floyd CJ, Dickens SH. Network structure of Bis-GMA-and UDMA-based resin systems. Dent Mater 2006;22:1143-9.   DOI
10 Dewaele M, Truffier-Boutry D, Devaux J, Leloup G. Volume contraction in photocured dental resins: the shrinkage-conversion relationship revisited. Dent Mater 2006;22:359-65.   DOI
11 Gonçalves F, Kawano Y, Pfeifer C, Stansbury JW, Braga RR. Infuence of BisGMA, TEGDMA, and BisEMA contents on viscosity, conversion, and fexural strength of experimental resins and composites. Eur J Oral Sci 2009;117:442-6.   DOI
12 Cook WD, Moopnar M. Influence of chemical structure on the fracture behaviour of dimethacrylate composite resins. Biomaterials 1990;11:272-6.   DOI
13 Cekic-Nagas I, Egilmez F, Ergun G, Vallittu PK, Lassila LVJ. Load-bearing capacity of novel resin-based fxed dental prosthesis materials. Dent Mater J 2018:37:49-58.   DOI
14 Drummond JL, Andronova K, Al-Turki LI, Slaughter LD. Leaching and mechanical properties characterization of dental composites. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2004;71:172-80.
15 Geurtsen W. Substances released from dental resin composites and glass ionomer cements. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:687-95.   DOI
16 Ferracane JL. Elution of leachable components from composites. J Oral Rehabil 1994;21:441-52.   DOI
17 Moszner N, Salz U. New developments of polymeric dental composites. Prog Polym Sci 2001;26: 535-76.   DOI
18 Zhang Y, Xu J. Effect of immersion in various media on the sorption, solubility, elution of unreacted monomers, and flexural properties of two model dental composite compositions. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008;19:2477-83.   DOI
19 Sideridou ID, Achilias DS. Elution study of unreacted Bis-GMA, TEGDMA, UDMA, and Bis-EMA from light-cured dental resins and resin composites using HPLC. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005;74:617-26.
20 Yoo JI, Kim SY, Batbayar B, Kim JW, Park SH, Cho KM. Comparison of fexural strength and modulus of elasticity in several resinous teeth splinting materials. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2016;32:169-75.   DOI
21 Truong VT, Tyas MJ. Prediction of in vivo wear in posterior composite resins: a fracture mechanics approach. Dent Mater 1988;4:318-27.   DOI
22 Mazzoleni S, Meschia G, Cortesi R, Bressan E, Tomasi C, Ferro R, Stellini E. In vitro comparison of the fexibility of different splint systems used in dental traumatology. Dent Traumatol 2010;26:30-6.   DOI
23 Zhou M, Drummond JL, Hanley L. Barium and strontium leaching from aged glass particle/resin matrix dental composites. Dent Mater 2005;21:145- 55.   DOI
24 Drummond JL. Cyclic fatigue of composite restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 1989;16:509-20.   DOI
25 Drummond JL, Khalaf MA, Randolph RG. In vitro ageing of composite restorative materials. Clin Mater 1988;3:209-21.   DOI
26 Wu W, McKinney JE. Influence of chemicals on wear of dental composites. J Dent Res 1982;61: 1180-3.   DOI
27 Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, Aguilera FS, Remeo A, de la Higuera B, García-Godoy F. Sorption and solubility testing of orthodontic bonding cements in different solutions. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006;76:251-6.
28 Sideridou I, Tserki V, Papanastasiou G. Study of water sorption, solubility and modulus of elasticity of light-cured dimethacrylate-based dental resins. Biomaterials 2003;24:655-65.   DOI
29 Asaoka K, Hirano S. Diffusion coeffcient of water through dental composite resin. Biomaterials 2003;24:975-9.   DOI
30 Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, Fuentes V, Prati C, García-Godoy F. Sorption and solubility of resin-based restorative dental materials. J Dent 2003; 31:43-50.   DOI