Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2018.34.1.10

Analysis of effects from usage of skeletal anchorage-assisted Pendulum appliance on vertical component of craniofacial structure  

Lee, Jin-Woo (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Publication Information
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science / v.34, no.1, 2018 , pp. 10-16 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate distalizing effects from the Pendulum appliance on vertical component of craniofacial structures. Materials and Methods: 20 Patients who visited for orthodontic treatments are assigned to two groups. Group I, SN-MP > 37 degrees are showing hyperdivergent pattern. Group II, 29 < SN-MP < 37 degrees are showing mesocephalic pattern. Each group are consisted of 10 people. Results and Conclusions: Differences between skeletal classifications result in significant differences at labioversion of lower incisors and distalized amount, which is larger at Group I (P <.05). Group II has only shown significant distalized molars (P < .05). Labioversion of lower incisors has not shown significant change. Skeletal anchorage-assisted Pendulum appliance doesn't deteriorate vertical component nor significantly improve.
Keywords
skeletal anchorage-assisted; Pendulum appliance; vertical component of craniofacial structures;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 2  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Bolla E, Muratore F, Carano A, Bowman SJ. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods. Angle Orthod 2002;72:481-94.
2 Burhan AS. Combined treatment with headgear and the Frog appliance for maxillary molar distalization: a randomized controlled trial. Korean J Orthod 2013;43:101-9.
3 Fuziy A, Rodrigues de Almeida R, Janson G, Angelieri F, Pinzan A. Sagittal, vertical, and transverse changes consequent to maxillary molar distalization with the pendulum appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:502-10.   DOI
4 Patel MP, Janson G, Henriques JF, de Almeida RR, de Freitas MR, Pinzan A, de Freitas KM. Comparative distalization effects of Jones jig and pendulum appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:336-42.   DOI
5 Mah SJ, Kim JE, Ahn EJ, Nam JH, Kim JY, Kang YG. Analysis of midpalatal miniscrew-assisted maxillary molar distalization patterns with simultaneous use of fixed appliances: a preliminary study. Korean J Orthod 2016;46:55-61.   DOI
6 Escobar SA, Tellez PA, Moncada CA, Villegas CA, Latorre CM, Oberti G. Distalization of maxillary molars with the bone-supported pendulum: a clinical study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:545-9.   DOI
7 Oncag G, Seckin O, Dincer B, Arikan F. Osseointegrated implants with pendulum springs for maxillary molar distalization: a cephalometric study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:16-26.   DOI
8 Oncag G, Akyalcin S, Arikan F. The effectiveness of a single osteointegrated implant combined with pendulum springs for molar distalization. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:277-84.   DOI
9 Polat-Ozsoy O, Kircelli BH, Arman-Ozcirpici A, Pektas ZO, Uckan S. Pendulum appliances with 2 anchorage designs: conventional anchorage vs bone anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:339.
10 Fudalej P, Antoszewska J. Are orthodontic distalizers reinforced with the temporary skeletal anchorage devices effective? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:722-9.   DOI
11 Grec RH, Janson G, Branco NC, Moura-Grec PG, Patel MP, Castanha Henriques JF. Intraoral distalizer effects with conventional and skeletal anchorage: a meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143:602-15.   DOI
12 Keles A, Erverdi N, Sezen S. Bodily distalization of molars with absolute anchorage. Angle Orthod 2003;73:471-82.
13 Kinzinger GS, Wehrbein H, Diedrich PR. Molar distalization with a modified pendulum appliancein vitro analysis of the force systems and in vivo study in children and adolescents. Angle Orthod 2005;75:558-67.
14 Caprioglio A, Fontana M, Longoni E, Cozzani M. Long-term evaluation of the molar movements following Pendulum and fixed appliances. Angle Orthod 2013;83:447-54.   DOI
15 Sar C, Kaya B, Ozsoy O, Ozcirpici AA. Comparison of two implant-supported molar distalization systems. Angle Orthod 2013;83:460-7.   DOI
16 Kang JM, Park JH, Bayome M, Oh M, Park CO, Kook YA, Mo SS. A three-dimensional finite element analysis of molar distalization with a palatal plate, pendulum, and headgear according to molar eruption stage. Korean J Orthod 2016;46:290-300.   DOI
17 Hilgers JJ, Bennet RK. The pendulum appliance: creating the gain. Clin Impressions 1994;3:14-23.
18 Karcher H, Byloff FK, Clar E. The Graz implant supported pendulum, a technical note. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2002;30:87-90.   DOI
19 Yu IJ, Kook YA, Sung SJ, Lee KJ, Chun YS, Mo SS. Comparison of tooth displacement between buccal mini-implants and palatal plate anchorage for molar distalization: a finite element study. Eur J Orthod 2014;36:394-402.   DOI
20 Hilgers JJ. The pendulum appliances for Class II non-compliance therapy. J Clin Orthod 1992;26:706-14.
21 Triaca A, Antonini M, Wintermantel E. Ein neus titan-flachschrauben-implantat zur orthodontischen verankerung am anterioren gaumen. Inf Orthod Kieferorthop 1992;24:251-7.
22 Wehrbein H, Merz BR, Diedrich P. Palatal bone support for orthodontic implant anchorage-a clinical and radiological study. Eur J Orthod 1999;21:65-70.   DOI
23 Kircelli BH, Pektas ZO, Kircelli C. Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance. Angle Orthod 2006;76:650-9.
24 Byloff FK, Darendeliler MA. Distal molar movement using the pendulum appliance. Part 1: Clinical and radiological evaluation. Angle Orthod 1997;67:249-60.