Browse > Article
http://dx.doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2017.33.2.88

Effect of repeated learning for two dental CAD software programs  

Son, KeunBaDa (Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University)
Lee, Wan-Sun (Advanced Dental Device Development Institute, Kyungpook National University)
Lee, Kyu-Bok (Department of Dental Science, Graduate School, Kyungpook National University)
Publication Information
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science / v.33, no.2, 2017 , pp. 88-96 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess the relationship between the time spent designing custom abutments and repeated learning using dental implant computer aided design (CAD) software. Materials and Methods: The design of customized abutments was performed four stages using the 3DS CAD software and the EXO CAD software, and measured repeatedly three times by each stage. Learning effect by repetition was presented with the learning curve, and the significance of the reduction in the total time and the time at each stage spent on designing was evaluated using the Friedman test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test. The difference in the design time between groups was analyzed using the repeated measure two-way ANOVA. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS statistics software (P < 0.05). Results: Repeated learning of the customized abutment design displayed a significant difference according to the number of repetition and the stage (P < 0.001). The difference in the time spent designing was found to be significant (P < 0.001), and that between the CAD software programs was also significant (P = 0.006). Conclusion: Repeated learning of CAD software shortened the time spent designing. While less design time on average was spent with the 3DS CAD than with the EXO CAD, the EXO CAD showed better results in terms of learning rate according to learning effect.
Keywords
repeated learning; learning curve; CAD software; customized abutment; learning rate;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Gonzalez JM, Cohen J, Gromski MA, Saito K, Loundou A, Matthe K. Learning curve for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of pancreatic lesions in a novel ex-vivo simulation model. Endosc Int Open 2016;4:E1286-91.   DOI
2 Ospina ODA, Medina AMR, Marulanda MC, Buitrago LMG. Cumulative Sum learning curves (CUSUM) in basic anaesthesia procedures. Rev Colomb Anestesiol 2014;42:142-53.   DOI
3 Khan N, Abboudi H, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Ahmed K. Measuring the surgical ‘learning curve': methods, variables and competency. BJU Int 2014; 113:504-8.   DOI
4 Berglund C, Soderholm P. Modeling technical change in energy system analysis: analyzing the introduction of learning-by-doing in bottom-up energy models. Energy Policy 2006;34:1344-56.   DOI
5 Ray LaHood, Lisa P. Jackson. Final rule making for 2017-2025 light-duty vehicle greenhouse gas emission standards and corporate average fuel economy standards. EPA and NHTSA 2012;3-24.
6 Jirapinyo P, Abidi WM, Aihara H, Zaki T, Tsay C, Imaeda AB, Thompson CC. Preclinical endoscopic training using a part-task simulator: learning curve assessment and determination of threshold score for advancement to clinical endoscopy. Surg Endosc 2017 Feb 22. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5436-x. [Epub ahead of print]   DOI
7 Arai T, Lefevre T, Hovasse T, Hayashida K, Watanabe Y, O'Connor SA, Benamer H, Garot P, Cormier B, Bouvier E, Morice MC, Chevalier B. Evaluation of the learning curve for transcatheter aortic valve implantation via the transfemoral approach. Int J Cardiol 2016;203:491-7.   DOI
8 Duret F, Preston JD. CAD/CAM imaging in dentistry. Curr Opin Dent 1991;1:150-4.
9 Duret F, Blouin JL, Duret B. CAD-CAM in dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 1988;117:715-20.   DOI
10 Park JH, Kim JE, Shim JS. Digital workflow for a dental prosthesis that considers lateral mandibular relation. J Prosthet Dent 2017;117:340-4.   DOI
11 Lee JJ. Relationship of dental stone properties and margins setting in CAD system. Available from: http://www.riss.kr/search/detail/DetailView.do?p_mat_type=be54d9b8bc7cdb09&control_no=3a 8f324dac3261eaffe0bdc3ef48d419 (updated 2017 May 9).
12 Lewis S, Beumer J 3rd, Hornburg W, Moy P. The" UCLA" abutment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:183-9.
13 Duke ES. The status of CAD/CAM in restorative dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2001;22: 968-72.
14 Kim HE, Cho IH. Stress analysis and fatigue failure of prefabricated and customized abutments of dental implants. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2013;29:209-23.   DOI
15 Rieder CE. Customized implant abutment copings to achieve biologic, mechanical, and esthetic objectives. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1996;16:20-9.
16 Heydecke G, Sierraalta M, Razzoog ME. Evolution and use of aluminum oxide single-tooth implant abutments: a short review and presentation of two cases. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:488-93.
17 Hong JI. A study on user's learn ability evaluation method using learning curve model. Graduate School of Korea University of Technology and Education, Master's Thesis; 2007.
18 Nielsen J, Landauer TK. A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems. in Proceedings of the INTERACT'93 and CHI'93 conference on Human factors in computing systems; 1993.
19 Hwang H. Work management. Seoul; Youngji munhwhasa; 1987. p.203-7.
20 Wright TP. Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. J Aeronaut Sci 1936;3:122-8.   DOI
21 Kahouli-Brahmi S. Technological learning in energy-environment-economy modelling: a survey. Energy Policy 2008;36:138-62.   DOI
22 Chambers D. Learning curves: what do dental students learn from repeated practice of clinical procedures? J Dent Educ 2012;76:291-302.
23 Kim J. Comparison of learning curves between two different intraoral scanners. Available from: http://www.riss.kr/search/detail/DetailView.do?p_mat_type=be54d9b8bc7cdb09&control_no=22db71188 64f83fdffe0bdc3ef48d419 (updated 2017 May 9).
24 Simpson AH, Howie CR, Norrie J. Surgical trial design - learning curve and surgeon volume: determining whether inferior results are due to the procedure itself, or delivery of the procedure by the surgeon. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:194-5.   DOI