Subjective Evaluation about Ideal Position of the Subnasale on Lateral Photos
![]() |
Kim, Yi-Dong
(Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Chung, Dong-Hwa (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) Cha, Kyung-Suk (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) Lee, Jin-Woo (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) Lee, Sang-Min (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) |
1 | Baldwin DC. Appearance and aesthetics in oral health. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1980;9:244-56. |
2 | Sarver DM. The esthetic impact of orthodontics : Planning treatment to meet patient's needs. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:99-102. |
3 | Papel ID. Quantitative facial esthetics evaluation with computer imaging. Facial Plast surg 1009;7:35-44. |
4 | Robinson SW, Speidel TM. Soft tissue profile change produced by reduction of mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod 1972;42:227-35. |
5 | Hodaway RA. A soft tissue cephalometric analysis and its use on orthodontic treatment planning Part I. Am J Orthod 1983;84:1-28. DOI ScienceOn |
6 | Hodaway RA. A soft tissue cephalometric analysis and its use on orthodontic treatment planning Part II. Am J Orthod 1983;85:279-63. |
7 | Langlois JH, Roggman LA. Attractive face are only average. Psychological Sci 1990;1:115-20. DOI |
8 | Farkas LG, Katic MJ, Hreczko TA. Anthropometric proportion in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face in young white adults. Am J Orthod 1984;86:52-60. DOI ScienceOn |
9 | Alley TR, Cunningham MR. Average face are attractive, but very attractive face are not average. Psychological Sci 1991;2:123-5. DOI |
10 | Perret DI, May K. Attractive characteristics of female face. Nature Lond 1994;38:239-42. |
11 | Peck H, Pech S. A concept of facial esthetics. Angle Orthod 1970;40:284-318. |
12 | Riketts RM. Planning treatment on the base of facial pattern and an estimate of its growth. Angle Orthod 1957:27:14-37. |
13 | Wuerpel EH. On facial balance and harmony. Angle Orthod 1937;7:81-9. |
14 | Ioi H, Nakata S. Anteroposterior lip position of the most favored Japanese facial profile. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2005;128:206-11. DOI ScienceOn |
15 | Soh J, Chew MT. A comparative assessment of the perception of Chinese facial profile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2005;127:692-9. DOI ScienceOn |
16 | Arezoo J, Mohammad B, Yekta A. Evaluation of the divine proportion in the facial profile of young females. Indian J Dent Res 2008;19;292-296 DOI ScienceOn |
17 | Romani KL, Agahi F. Evaluation of horizontal and vertical difference in facial profile by orthodontists and lay people. Angle Orthod 1993;63:175-82. |
18 | Burstone CJ. Lip posture and its significance in treatment planning. Am J Orthod 1967;53;262-84. DOI ScienceOn |
19 | Prahl-Andersen B, Boersma H. Perception of dentofacial morphology by lay persons, general dentists and orthodontists. J Am Dent Assoc 1979;98:209-12. DOI |
20 | Bell R, Kiyk HA. Perception of facial profile and their influences on the decision to undergo orthognathic surgery. Am J Orthod 1985;88:323-32. DOI ScienceOn |
21 | Scheideman GB, Bell WH, Legan HL, Finn RA, Reisch JS. Cephalometric analysis of dentofacial normals. Am J orthod 1980;78;404-20. DOI ScienceOn |
22 | Arnett GW, Jelic JS, Kim J, Cummings DR, Beress A, Worley CM, Chung B, Bergman R. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis: diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial deformity. Am J Orthod 1999;116;239-53. DOI ScienceOn |
23 | Powell N, Humphreys B. Proportions of the Esthetics. New York, Thiemestratton Inc, 1984. |
24 | Martin JG. Racial ethnocentrism and judgement of beauty. J Soc Psychol 1964;63:59. DOI |
25 | Iliffe AH. A study of preferences in feminine beauty. Brit J Psychol 1960;51:276. |
26 | Udry JR. Structural correlates of feminine beauty preferences in Britain and United States : a comparison. Socio and Social Res 1965;49:330. |
27 | Cochrane SM, Cunningham SJ. Perception of facial appearance by orthodontists and general public. J Clin Orthod 1997;31:164-8. |
28 | Dunlevy HA, White RP, Proffit WR. Professional and lay judgement of facial esthetics changes following orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult 1987;2:151-8. |
29 | Kerr WJS. Panel perception of facial attractiveness. Br J Orthod 1990;17:299-304. DOI ScienceOn |
30 | Lines PA, Lines RR. Profilemetrics and facial esthetics. Am J Orthod 1978;73:648-57. DOI ScienceOn |
31 | Howella DJ, Shawo. The validity and reliability of rating of dental and facial attractiveness for epidemiologic use. Am J Orthod 1985;88:402-8. DOI ScienceOn |
32 | Phillips C. Perception of facial attractiveness by patients, peers, and professionals. Int J Adult Orthod 1995;10:127-35. |
33 | Burcal RG, Laskin DM. Recognition of profile change after simulated orthognathic surgery. J Oral Maxillofacial surg 1987;45:666-70. DOI ScienceOn |
34 | Julie C. Faure. et al. The influence of different facial components on facial aesthetics. Eur J Orthod 2002;24:1-7. DOI ScienceOn |
35 | Phillips C, Tulloch C, Dann C. Rating of facial attractiveness. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1992;20:214-20. DOI ScienceOn |
36 | Aitken RCB. Measurement of feeling using visual analogue scale. Proc R Soc Med 1969;62:17-21. |
37 | Sandra AM, Marina LV, Mladen S. Analysis of the soft tissue facial profile by means of angular measurements. Eur J Orthod 2008;30;135-140. DOI ScienceOn |
38 | Siddik M, Abdullah D, Tancan U, Naci C. Angular photogrammetric analysis of the soft tissue facial profile of Turkish adults. Eur J Orthod 2009;31;174-179. DOI ScienceOn |
![]() |