Browse > Article

Three Dimensional Finite Element Analysis on Stress Distribution According to the Bucco-lingual Inclination of the Implant Fixture and Abutment in the Mandibular Posterior Region  

Lee, Hyun-Sook (Dept. of Implantology, Graduate School of Clinical dentistry Ewha Womans University)
Kim, Ji-Youn (Dept. of Dentistry, Mok-dong Hospital School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Kim, Ye-Mi (Dept. of Dentistry, Mok-dong Hospital School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
Kim, Myung-Rae (Dept. of Implantology, Graduate School of Clinical dentistry Ewha Womans University)
Kim, Sun-Jong (Dept. of Implantology, Graduate School of Clinical dentistry Ewha Womans University)
Publication Information
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science / v.27, no.4, 2011 , pp. 371-392 More about this Journal
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to comparatively analyze the stress distribution according to the inclinations of abutments and angulations of the implant fixtures under occlusal loading force. Three study models with straight and $15^{\circ}$ and $25^{\circ}$-angled abutments were prepared following the insertion of Implants parallel to the long axis of the tooth. Additional two experimental models were fabricated with $15^{\circ}$ and $25^{\circ}$ fixture inclinations. Using ANSYS 11, a finite element analysis program, the magnitudes of stress distribution were analyzed. The magnitude of stress under loading was lowest when the load was applied vertically onto the axis of implant. And the magnitude of stress under compound(vertical+oblique) loading was increased as the inclination of implant abutment and fixture was increase. But, the distribution of stress was different as the loading conditions, because of the horizontal offset. As the offset between the axis of loading and the central axis of the implant increased, the stress was increased.
Keywords
Dental Implants; Finite Element Analysis; Occlusal Force; Stress Distribution;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Weinberg LA, Kruger B. Biomechanical considerations when combining tooth-supported and implant-supported prostheses. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1994;78:22-27.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 David CH, William RG, Vijay KG. Comparison of stress transmission in the IMZ implant system with polyoxymethylene or titanium intramobile element - A finite element strss analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:450-458.
4 Davis DM, Zarb GA, Chao YL. Studies on frameworks for osseointegrated prostheses. Part1. The effect of varying the number of supporting abutments. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3: 197-201.
5 Ferrario V, Sforza C. Biomechanical module of the human mandible - A hypothesis involving stabilizing activity of the superior belly of lateral pterygoid muscle. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:829-835.   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Haldun I, Kivanc A. Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three-unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone. J Dent 2002;30:41-46.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Bergman B. Evaluation of results of treatment with osseointegrated implants by the Swedish National Board of Health and welfare. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:114-120.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Borchers I, Reidhart P. Three Dimensional stress distribution around dental implants at different stages of interface development. J Dent Res 1994;62:155- 159.
9 Bidez MW, Misch CE. Issues in bone mechanics related to oral implants. Implant Dent 1:289-294, 1992.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Cowin SC. Bone mechanics. Boca Raton, Fla, CRC Press, 1989.
11 Misch CE, Bidez Mw. Implant-protected occlusion: a biomechanical rationale. Compend Cont Educ Dent 15:1330-1343, 1994.
12 Cibirka RM, Cibirka RM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR, Stohler CS. Determining the force absorption quotient for restorative materials used in implant occlusal surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1992;361-364.
13 O'Brien WJ. Dental materials & their selection. Chicago: Quintessence; 1997:259-272.
14 Boyer R, Collings EW, Collings, Welschet G. Materials Properties Handbook: Titanium Alloys. Rotherham: ASM International; 1994:12-22.
15 Holt JM, Mindlin H, Ho CY. Structural Alloys Handbook, West Lafayette: CINDAS/ Purdue University; 1996.
16 Moyen BJ, Lahey PJ, Weinberg EH, Rumelhart C, Harris WH. Effect of application of metal plates to bone. Comparison of a rigid with a flexible plate. Acta Orthop Belg 1980;46:806-815.
17 Hassler CR, Rybicki EF, Simonen FA, Weis EB. Measurements of healing at an osteotome in a rabbit calvarium: the influence of applied compressive stress on collagen synthesis and calcification. J Biomechanics 1974;7:545-50.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Soltesz U, Siegele D. Principal characteristics of the stress distribution in the jaw caused by dental implants. In: Huiskes R, van Campen DH, de Wijn JR (eds). Biomechanics: principles and applications. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff; 1982:439-444.
19 Binderman I. NIH grant study on two-dimensional FEA study of 54 implant body designs, 1973 (personal communication).
20 Lavernia CJ, Cook SD, Weinstein AM, Klawitter JJ. Analysis of stresses in a dental implant system. J Biomech 1981;14:555-560.   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Siegele D, Soltesz U. Numerical investigations of the influence of implant shape on stress distribution in the jaw bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:333-340.
22 Richter EJ, Orschall B, Jovanovic SA. Dental implant abutment resembling the two-phase tooth mobility. J Biotech 1990;23:297-306.
23 Cook RD, Malkus DS, Plesha ME. Concepts and applications of finite element analysis. 4th ed. New York: JohnWiley & Sons; 2001:542-573.
24 Haraldson T, Carlsson GE. Biteforce and oral function in patients with osseointegrated oral implants. Scand J Dent Res 1977;85:200-208.
25 Sertgoz A. Finite element analysis study of the effect of superstructure material on stress distribution in an implant supported fixed prosthesis. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:19-27.
26 Issidor F. Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implant Res 1996;7: 143-152.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Reiger MR, Adams WK, Kinzel GL. A finite element survey of eleven endosseous implants. J prosphet Dent 1990;63:457-465.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Holmgren EP, Seckinger RJ, Kilgren LM. Evaluating parameter of osseointegrated dental implant using finite element analysis a two-dimensional comparative study examining the effect of implant diameter, implant shape and load direction. J Oral Implantol 1998;14:80-88.
29 Clelland NL, Ismail YH, Zaki HS, Pipko D. Three dimensional finite element stress analysis in and arround the screw-vent implant. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:391-398.
30 Ko CC, Kohn DH, Hollister SJ. Micromechanics of implant/tissueinterfaces, J Oral Implantol 1992;18: 220-230.