Browse > Article

Histomorphometric Study of Sinus Bone Graft using Various Graft Material  

Lee, Ji-Young (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
Kim, Young-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of dentistry, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital)
Kim, Su-Gwan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University)
Lim, Sung-Chul (Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Chosun University)
Publication Information
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science / v.27, no.2, 2011 , pp. 141-147 More about this Journal
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate histomorphometrically and compare the efficiency of various bone graft material and autogenous tooth bone graft material which were used in sinus bone graft procedure. Subjects were the 24 patients who had treated with sinus bone graft using lateral approach from October 2007 to September 2009 at SNUBH. The average age was $52.51{\pm}11.86$ years. All cases was taken after 4month of procedure and divided into 3 groups according to bone graft material. Group 1: autogenous tooth bone graft material, Group 2: OrthoblastII(integra lifescience corp. Irvine, US)+Biocera(Osscotec, seoul, korea), group 3: DBX(Synthes, USA)+BioOss(Geistlich Pharm AG, Wolhusen, Switzerland). Total 37 implant placement area were included and evaluated(7 in group 1, 10 in group 2, 20 in group 3). Evaluation of new bone formation, ratio of woven bone to lamellar bone, ratio of new bone to graft material were performed on each tissue section. Kruskal-Wallis test was used for statistical analysis(SPSS Ver. 12.0, USA). New bone formation were $52.5{\pm}10.7%$ in group 1, $52.0{\pm}23.4%$ in group 2, $51.0{\pm}18.3%$ in group 3. There were no statistical significant differences between each groups. Ratio of woven bone to lamella bone were $82.8{\pm}15.3%$ in group 1, $36.7{\pm}59.3%$ in group 2, $31.0{\pm} 51.2%$ in group 3. Ratio of new bone to graft material were $81.3{\pm}10.4%$ in group 1, $72.5{\pm}28.8%$ in group 2, $80.3{\pm}24.0%$ in group 3. After 4 month of healing period, all group showed favorable new bone formation and around graft material and implant. Within limitation of our study, it is suggested that autogenous tooth bone graft material might be used as novel bone graft material for sinus bone graft.
Keywords
Autogenous tooth bone graft material; sinus bone graft;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Kim YK. Kim SG. Lee BG. Bone graft and implant. Vol 2-2. Clinical application of a variety of bone graftSeoul. Korea. Narea pub. 2007, p.160-261.
2 Kolerman R, Tal H, Moses O. Histomorphometric analysis of newly formed bone after maxillary sinus floor augmentation using ground cortical bone allograft and internal collagen membrane. J Periodontol. 2008;79:2104-11   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Del Fabbro M, Testori T, Francetti L,Weinstein R. Systematic review of survival rates for implants placed in the grafted maxillary sinus. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2004;24:565-77
4 Kim YK, Lee HJ, Kim SG, et al. Analysis of inorganic component and SEM analysis of autogenous teeth bone graft material and histomorphometric analysis after graft. The J Korean Acad Implant Dent. 2009;28:1-9.
5 Kim YK, Lee JY. The evaluation of postoperative safety of autogenous teeth bone graft. The J Kor Acad Implant Dent. 2009;28 :29-35.
6 Kim YK. Kim SG. Lee BG. Bone graft and implant. Seoul. Korea. Narea pub. 2007. p.166-197.
7 Norton MR, Odell EW, Thompson ID, Cook RJ. Efficacy of bovine bone mineral for alveolar augmentation: a human histologic study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14:775-83.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Kim YK, Lee HJ, Kim SG, Um IW. Guided Bone Regeneration using autogenous teeth(Ahto BT). Dental Success. 2009;29:92633.
9 Kim YK, Kim SG, Byeon JH et al. Development of a novel bone grafting material using autogenous teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109:496-503.   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Nannmark U, Sennerby L. The bone tissue responses to prehydrated and collagenated cortico-cancellous porcine bone grafts: a study in rabbit maxillary defects. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008;10: 264-70.
11 Mizuno M, Kuboki Y. Osteoblast-related gene expression of bone marrow cells during the osteoblastic differentiation induced by type I collagen. J Biochem. 2001;129:133-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Wang LC, Takahashi I, Sasano Y et al. Osteoclastogenic activity during mandibular distraction osteogenesis. J Dent Res. 2005;84:1010-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Giachelli CM, Steitz S. Osteopontin: a versatile regulator of inflammation and biomineralization. Matrix Biol. 2000;19:615-22.   DOI   ScienceOn