Browse > Article

The Effect of Temporary Cement Cleaning Methods on the Retentive Strength of Cementation Type Implant Prostheses  

Shin, Hwang-Kyu (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Song, Young-Gyun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Shin, Soo-Yeon (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
Publication Information
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science / v.27, no.2, 2011 , pp. 125-140 More about this Journal
Abstract
The remnant of temporary cement on the intaglio surface of cast restoration may have a negative effect on the retentive strength of permanent cement. This study was to evaluate the effect of temporary cement cleaning methods on the retentive strength of cementation type implant prostheses. Prefabricated implant abutments - height 5.5mm, diameter 4.5mm, 6 degree axial wall taper with chamfer margins were used. Forty copings-abutment specimens were divided into four groups(each n=10) according to the cleaning methods for temporary cement(Temp-$Bond^{(R)}$) as follows : no temporary cementation(the control group), orange solvent, ultrasonic cleaning, air borne-particle abrasion. After the application of temporary cement and the separation, the cleaning procedure was performed according to the protocol of each group. The specimens were cemented with $Premier^{(R)}$ Implant $Cement^{TM}$. After the permanent cementation, the specimens were subjected to thermocycling and pulled out from the specimens with a universal testing machine at a cross-head speed of 0.5mm/min. After the retentive strength test, all the specimens were cleaned using ultrasonic cleaning, abraded with air borne-particles, and steam-cleaned. Likewise, the specimens were temporarily cemented(Temp-$Bond^{(R)}$ NE), cleaned according to the protocol of each group, cemented with $Premier^{(R)}$ Implant $Cement^{TM}$ and subjected to thermocycling and measurement of their retentive strength. The mean of group with orange solvent were significantly lower than those of other groups(p<0.05). There was no significance between group with ultrasonic cleaning and group with air borne-particle abrasion. Group with ultrasonic cleaning and group with air-particle abrasion were no significance at control group. There was no significance between group cemented with Temp-$Bond^{(R)}$ and group cemented with Temp-$Bond^{(R)}$ NE. Within the limitation of this study, it can be concluded that the temporary cement cleaning method with only orange solvent may have a negative effect on the retentive strength of permanent cement. Ultrasonic cleaning and air borne-particle abrasion methods are recommended for the temporary cement cleaning method on cementation type implant prostheses.
Keywords
cementation type implant prostheses; eugenol; Premier Implant Cement; retentive strength; temporary cement cleaning method;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Jemt T, Lekholm U, Adell R. Osseointegrated implant in the treatment of partially edentulous patients : A preliminary study on 876 consecutively placed fixtures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989;4:211-7.
2 Lewis SG, Beumer J III, Perri GR, Hornburg WP. Single tooth implant supported restoration. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:25-30.
3 Michalakis KX, Pissiotis AL, Hirayama H. Cement failure loads of four provisional luting agents used for the cementation of implant-supported fixed partial dentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15: 545-9.
4 Hebel KS, Gajar RC. Cement-retained versus screw- retained implant restorations : Achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:28-35.   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Chee W, Felton DA, Johnson PF, Sullivan DY. Cemented versus screw-retained implant prostheses: Which is better? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:137-41.
6 Misch CE. Screw-retained vs cement-retained implant -supported prostheses. Prac Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995;7:15-8.
7 Taylor TD, Agar JR, Vogiatzi T. Implant prosthodontics : Current perspective and future directions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15: 66-75.
8 Jemt T, Pettersson P. A 3-year follow-up study on single implant treatment. J Dent 1993;21:203-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Ekfeldt A, Carlsson GE, Brjesson G. Clinical evaluation of single-tooth restorations supported by osseointegrated implants: a retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:179-83.
10 Clayton GH, Driscoll CF, Hondrum SO. The effect of luting agents on the retention and marginal adaptation of the Ceraone implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:660-5.
11 Ramp MH, Dixon DL, Ramp LC, Breeding LC, Barber LL. Tensile bond strengths of provisional luting agents used with an implant system. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:510-4.   DOI   ScienceOn
12 Akca K, Iplikcioglu H, Cehreli MC. Comparison of uniaxial resistance force of cements used with implant-supported crowns. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:536-42.
13 Pauletto N, Lahiffe BJ, Walton JN. Complications associated with excess cement around crowns on osseointegrated implants : A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:865-8.
14 Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Bogacki MT, Tietge JD. Use of luting agents with an implant system Part I. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:737-41.   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Hansen EK, Asmussen E. Influence of temporary filling materials on effect of dentin bonding agents. Scand J Dent Res 1987;95:516-20.
16 Binnon PP, Sutter F. The role of screws in implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:48-63.
17 Millstein PL, Nathanson D. Effects of temporary cementation on permanent cement retention to composite resin cores. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:856-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:399-410.   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Zarb GA, Schmidt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants : the Toronto study. Part II : the prosthetic results. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:53-61.   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Dennison JD. Powers JM. A review of dental cements used for permanent retention of restoration Part 2 : Properties and criteria for selection. Mich Dent Am J 1974;56:218.
21 Gregory WA, Griffiths L, Irwin G. Effects of intracore mechanical interlocks and cement type on full crown retention. Am J Dent 1991;4:29-32.
22 Juntavee N, Millstein PL. Effect of surface roughness and cement space on crown retention. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:482-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
23 Singer A, Serfaty V. Cement-retained implant supported fixed partial dentures : A 6-month to 3-year follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:645-9.
24 David AC, Dennis KK, Henry A, Sreenivas K. Effect of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial retention force of implant-supported crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:344-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
25 Rosenstiel SF, Fujimoto J. Contemporary fixed prosthodontics. 4th edition St. Louis : Mosby;2004.
26 Grasso CA, Caluori DM, Goldstein GR. In vivo evaluation of three cleansing techniques for prepared abutment teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88(4);437-41.   DOI   ScienceOn
27 Erkut S, Kucukesmen HC, Eminkahyagil N. Influence of previous cementation on the bond strength between two definitive resin-based luting and dentin bonding agents and human dentin. Oper Dent 2007;32(1):84-93.   DOI   ScienceOn
28 Terata R, Nakashima K, Kubota M. Effect of temporary materials on bond strength of resin-modified glass-ionomer luting cements to teeth. Am J Dent 2000;13(4):209-11.
29 Lingard GL, Davies EH, Von Fraunhofer JA. The interaction between lining materials and composite resin restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil 1981;8 (2):121-9.   DOI
30 Marshall SJ, Marshall GW, Harcourt JK. The influence of various cavity bases on the micro-hardness of composites. Aust Dent J 1982;27 (5):291-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Influence of eugenol- containing temporary cement on efficacy on dentin- bonding systems. Eur J Oral Sci 1999;107(1):65-9.   DOI   ScienceOn
32 Koka S, Ewoldsen NO, Dana CL, Beatty MW. The effect of cementing agent and technique on the retention of a CeraOne gold cylinder : A pilot study. Implant Dent 1995;4:32-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
33 GaRey DJ, Tjan AHL, James RA, Caputo AA. Effects of thermocycling, load-cycling, and blood contamination on cemented implant abutments. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:124-32.   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Mansour A, Ercoli C, Graser G, Ross T, Mark M. Comparative evaluation of casting retention using the ITI solid abutment with six cements. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:343-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
35 Dixon DL, Breeding LC, Lilly KR. Use of luting agents with an implant system : Part II. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:885-90.   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Kent DK, Koka S, Froeschle ML. Retention of cemented implant-supported restorations. J Prosthod 1997;6:193-6.   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Randi AP, Hsu AT, Verga A, Kim JJ. Dimensional accuracy and retentive strength of a retrievable cement-retained implant-supported prosthesis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:547-56.
38 Covey DA, Kent DK, St. Germain Jr HA, Koka S. Effects of abutment size and luting cement type on the uniaxial resistance force of implant-supported crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:344-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
39 Schneider RL. Evaluation of the retention of castings to endosseous dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1987;58:73-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
40 Kerby RE, McGlumphy EA, Holloway JA. Some physical properties of implant abutment luting cements. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:321-5.
41 Mathews MF, Breeding LC, Dixon DL, Aquilino SA. The effect of connector design on cement retention in an implant and natural tooth-supported fixed partial denture. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:822-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
42 Wendt SL, McInnes PA, Dickinson GL. The effect of thermocycling in microleakage analysis. Dent Mater 1992;8:181.   DOI   ScienceOn
43 Bernal G, Okamura M, Munoz CA. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations. J Prosthodont 2003;12:111-5.   DOI   ScienceOn
44 Bresciano M, Schierano G, Manzella C, Screti A, Bignardi C, Preti G. Retention of luting agents on implant abutments of different height and taper. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:594-8.   DOI   ScienceOn
45 Sheets JL, Wilcox C, Wilwerding T. Cement selection for cement-retained crown technique with dental implants. J Prosthodont 2008;17:92-6.   DOI   ScienceOn