Browse > Article

A case of Obturator using Swing-lock Attachment for Par tial Edentulous Patient with Hemi-Maxillectomy Patient  

Oh, Byung-Doo (Department of Prosthodontics, Dankook University)
Lim, Jong-Hwa (Department of Prosthodontics, Dankook University)
Shin, Soo-Yeon (Department of Prosthodontics, Dankook University)
Publication Information
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science / v.26, no.1, 2010 , pp. 33-38 More about this Journal
Abstract
Maxillectomy is a treatment option for maxillary cancer, which leaves the patient with a palatal defect. It may cause problems with facial deformation, swallowing, mastication, and speech. These functional problems and changes in appearance may result in psychological problems. To control these deficits after maxillectomy, surgical reconstruction or prosthodontic treatment can be chosen as a treatment option. Obturator prosthesis has been used as a preferred method of rehabilitation for most maxillectomy patients. This case is a patient who was classified Aramany classification II hemi-maxillectomy patient with residual teeth from #11-25, whose teeth had substantial labioversion and clinically lengthened from alveolar bone involution, thus making it hard to select proper framework design and resist to the rotational dislodging force of the obturator. Therefore we selected swing-lock attachment design to remain pre-existing crown and bridges and obtain retention and stability of obturator. The swing-lock RPD is economical than the conventional RPD because we can remain pre-existing crown and bridges. And residual teeth which have mobility and poor prognosis can be successfully retained through properly designed swing-lock RPD as it is functioning as a removable splint on the teeth.
Keywords
maxillectomy; obturator; swing-lock;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Becker CM, Bolender CL. Designing swinglock partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1981 Aug;46(2):126-32.   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Bolender CL, Becker CM. Swinglock removable partial dentures: where and when. J Prosthet Dent. 1981 Jan;45(1):4-10.   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Schulte JK, Smith DE. Clinical evaluation of swinglock removable partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1980 Dec;44(6):595-603.   DOI   ScienceOn
4 Simmons JJ. Swing-lock stabilization and retention. Texas Dent J 1963;81:10-2.
5 Simmons JJ. Swing-lock clinical manual. Dallas: Idea Development Co, 1968.
6 Javid NS, Dadmanesh J. Obturator design for hemimaxillectomy patients. J Prosthet Dent. 1976;36:77-81.   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Parr GR, Gardner LK. Swing-lock design considerations for obturator frameworks. J Prosthet Dent. 1995 Nov;74(5):503-11.   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Aramany MA. Basic principles of obturator design for partially edentulous patients. Part I: classification. J Prosthet Dent. 1978 Nov;40(5):554-7.   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Aramany MA. Basic principles of obturator design for partially edentulous patients. Part II: design principles. J Prosthet Dent. 1978 Dec;40(6):656-62.   DOI   ScienceOn