Browse > Article

A Retrospective Study of Survival Rate in single Brnemark TiUniteTM Implant  

Kim, Hye-Jin (Department of Periodontics, The Institute of Oral Health and Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Yang, Seung-Min (Department of Periodontics, The Institute of Oral Health and Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Kye, Seung-Beom (Department of Periodontics, The Institute of Oral Health and Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Shin, Seung-Yun (Department of Periodontics, The Institute of Oral Health and Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
Publication Information
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science / v.25, no.3, 2009 , pp. 267-277 More about this Journal
Abstract
Recently implant supported single crown is the popular treatment option to replace a single missing tooth. The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyze and evaluate the survival of implants with the $TiUnite^{TM}$ surface for single tooth replacement. From September 2002 to December 2006, 269 TiUniteTM surfaced implants were used in single tooth replacements at the Institute of Oral Health Science, Samsung Medical Center. Twenty one cases were excluded because of neighbor implants, missing records & short follow up period. Among 248 implants, the 129 implants (52.0%) were inserted in the maxilla and 119 (48.0%) in the mandible. One hundred implants placement (40.3%) were combined with guided bone regeneration, and 36 implants placement (14.5%) were combined with sinus bone augmentation. Mean observation period was $26.0{\pm}11.8$ months after implant placement. Twelve implants were recorded as failures, rendering a single implant survival rate of 95.2% over the observation period. Among failed 12 implants, 10 implants placed in the maxilla. The survival rate in the maxilla was 92.2% and in the mandible was 98.3%. The use of $TiUnite^{TM}$ surfaced single implant placement showed high survival rate for short time period.
Keywords
$TiUnite^{TM}$ surface; single tooth replacement; retrospective study; survival rate; implant;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U et al. Biological factors contributing to failures of osseointegrated oral implants. (II). Etiopathogenesis. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:721-764   DOI   ScienceOn
2 Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA et al. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52: 155-170   DOI   PUBMED
3 Glauser R, Gottlow J, Lundgren AK et al. Immediate occlusal loading of Brnemark Mk IV TiUnite implants placed in bone quality type 4. Appl Osseointegration Res 2002;3:22-24
4 Glauser R, Lundgren AK, Gottlow J et al. Immediate occlusal loading of Branemark TiUnite implants placed predominantly in soft bone: 1-year results of a prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5 Suppl 1:47-56   PUBMED
5 Rocci A, Martignoni M, Gottlow J. Immediate loading of Branemark System TiUnite and machined-surface implants in the posterior mandible: a randomized open-ended clinical trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5 Suppl 1:57-63   PUBMED
6 Holm C, Tidehag P, Tillberg A et al. Longevity and quality of FPDs: a retrospective study of restorations 30, 20, and 10 years after insertion. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:283-289
7 Sul YT, Johansson CB, Kang Y et al. Bone reactions to oxidized titanium implants with electrochemical anion sulphuric acid and phosphoric acid incorporation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002;4:78-87   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Lundgren AK et al. Experimental studies on oxidized implants. A histomorphometrical and biomechanical analysis. Appl Osseointegration Res 2000;1:21-24
9 Ivanoff CJ, Widmark G, Johansson C et al. Histologic evaluation of bone response to oxidized and turned titanium micro-implants in human jawbone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003;18:341-348   PUBMED
10 Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Branemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. J Periodontol 1991;62:2-4   DOI   PUBMED
11 Avivi-Arber L, Zarb GA. Clinical effectiveness of implant-supported single-tooth replacement: the Toronto Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:311-321   PUBMED
12 Calandriello R, Tomatis M, Vallone R et al. Immediate occlusal loading of single lower molars using Branemark System Wide-Platform TiUnite implants: an interim report of a prospective open-ended clinical multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5 Suppl 1:74-80   DOI   ScienceOn
13 Degidi M, Petrone G, Iezzi G et al. Histologic evaluation of a human immediately loaded titanium implant with a porous anodized surface. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002;4:110-114   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Henry PJ, Laney WR, Jemt T et al. Osseointegrated implants for single-tooth replacement: a prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:450-455   PUBMED
15 Walton TR. An up to 15-year longitudinal study of 515 metal-ceramic FPDs: Part 2. Modes of failure and influence of various clinical characteristics. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:177-182
16 Salinas TJ, Eckert SE. In patients requiring single-tooth replacement, what are the outcomes of implant- as compared to tooth-supported restorations? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22 Suppl:71-95   PUBMED
17 Jung RE, Pjetursson BE, Glauser R et al. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:119-130   DOI   ScienceOn
18 Jeong SM, Choi BH, Li J et al. Influence of abutment connections and plaque control on the initial healing of prematurely exposed implants: an experimental study in dogs. J Periodontol 2008;79:1070-1074   DOI   ScienceOn
19 Cheung GS, Dimmer A, Mellor R et al. A clinical evaluation of conventional bridgework. J Oral Rehabil 1990;17:131-136   DOI   PUBMED
20 Hochman N, Mitelman L, Hadani PE et al. A clinical and radiographic evaluation of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) prepared by dental school students: a retrospective study. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:165-170   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Cochran DL, Buser D, ten Bruggenkate CM et al. The use of reduced healing times on ITI implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) surface: early results from clinical trials on ITI SLA implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:144-153   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Tal H, Artzi Z, Moses O et al. Spontaneous early exposure of submerged endosseous implants resulting in crestal bone loss: a clinical evaluation between stage I and stage II surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:514-521   PUBMED
23 Huang YH, Xiropaidis AV, Sorensen RG et al. Bone formation at titanium porous oxide (TiUnite) oral implants in type IV bone. Clin Oral Implants Res 2005;16:105-111   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
24 Andersson B, Odman P, Lindvall AM et al. Single-tooth restorations supported by osseointegrated implants: results and experiences from a prospective study after 2 to 3 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:702-711   PUBMED
25 Jemt T. Implant treatment in resorbed edentulous upper jaws. A three-year follow-up study on 70 patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 1993;4:187-194   DOI
26 Toljanic JA, Banakis ML, Willes LA et al. Soft tissue exposure of endosseous implants between stage I and stage II surgery as a potential indicator of early crestal bone loss. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:436-441   PUBMED
27 Friberg B, Grondahl K, Lekholm U. A new self-tapping Branemark implant: clinical and radiographic evaluation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:80-85   PUBMED
28 Vanden Bogaerde L, Pedretti G, Dellacasa P et al. Early function of splinted implants in maxillas and posterior mandibles using Branemark system machined-surface implants: an 18-month prospective clinical multicenter study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5 Suppl 1:21-28   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Friberg B, Dahlin C, Widmark G et al. One-year results of a prospective multicenter study on Branemark System implants with a TiUnite surface. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2005;7 Suppl 1:S70-75   DOI   PUBMED
30 Buser D, Weber HP, Bragger U et al. Tissue integration of one-stage ITI implants: 3-year results of a longitudinal study with Hollow-Cylinder and Hollow-Screw implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:405-412   PUBMED
31 Misch CE. Maxillary sinus augmentation for endosteal implants: organized alternative treatment plans. Int J Oral Implantol 1987;4:49-58
32 Fugazzotto PA, Vlassis J, Butler B. ITI implant use in private practice: clinical results with 5,526 implants followed up to 72+ months in function. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:408-412   PUBMED
33 Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP et al. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-172   DOI   ScienceOn
34 Lundgren S, Brechter M. Preliminary findings of using oxidized titanium implants in reconstructive jaw surgery. Appl Osseointegr Res 2002;3:35-39
35 Karlsson S. Failures and length of service in fixed prosthodontics after long-term function. A longitudinal clinical study. Swed Dent J 1989;13: 185-192   PUBMED