Browse > Article

Removal Torque of Mg-ion Implanted Clinical Implants with Plasma Source Ion Implantation Method  

Kim, Bo-Hyoun (Dept. of Prosthodontics & Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, National University of Kangnung-Wonju)
Kim, Dae-Gon (Dept. of Prosthodontics & Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, National University of Kangnung-Wonju)
Park, Chan-Jin (Dept. of Prosthodontics & Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, National University of Kangnung-Wonju)
Cho, Lee-Ra (Dept. of Prosthodontics & Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, National University of Kangnung-Wonju)
Publication Information
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science / v.25, no.1, 2009 , pp. 41-52 More about this Journal
Abstract
The surface treatment of titanium implant could bring out the biochemical bonding between bone and implant. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical bone response of Mg-ion implanted implants with plasma source ion implantation method. Twelve New Zealand white rabbits were included in this study. Each rabbit received one control fixture (blasted with resorbable blasting media, RBM) and three types of Mg ion implanted fixtures in tibiae. The implants were left in place for 6 weeks before the rabbits were sacrificed. Removal torque value and resonance frequency analysis (ISQ) were compared. The repeated measured analysis of variance was used with $P{\leq}0.05$ as level of statistical significance. ISQ was not different among all groups. However, the ISQ was increased after 6 weeks healing. The group had lowest ISQ value showed the greatest increment. Mg-1 implants with 9.4% retained ion dose showed significantly higher removal torque value than that of the other implants. From this results, it is concluded that the Mg-1 implants has stronger bone response than control RBM surface implant.
Keywords
ion implantation; removal torque; magnesium; RFA; RBM;
Citations & Related Records
연도 인용수 순위
  • Reference
1 Ellingsen JE, Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, Holmen A. Improved retention and bone-to-implant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:659-666
2 Maitz MF, Poon RW, Liu XY, Pham MT, Chu PK. Bioactivity of titanium following sodium plasma immersion ion implantation and deposition. Biomaterials. 2005; 26:5465-5473   DOI   ScienceOn
3 Johansson C, Lausmaa J, Rostlund T, Thomsen P. Commercially pure titamium and Ti6Al4V implants with and without nigrogen ion-implantation: surface characterization and quantitative studies in rabbit cortical bone. J Mater Sci-Mater Med 1993;4: 132-141   DOI
4 Mändl S, Krause D, Thorwarth G, Sader R, Zeihofer F, Horch HH, Rauschenbach B. Plasma immersion ion implantation treatment of medical implants. Surf Coat Tech 2001; 142:1046-1050   DOI   ScienceOn
5 Mould AP, Akiyama SK, Humphries MJ. Regulation of integrin alpha 5 beta 1-fibronectin interactions by divalent cations. Evidence for distinct classes of binding sites for Mn2+,Mg2+,andCa2+.JBiolChem 1996;270:26270-26277   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Meredith N. Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11: 491-501
7 Sennerby, L., Thomsen, P. & Ericson, L.E. Ultrastructure of the bone–titanium interface in rabbits. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 1992;3:262–271   DOI
8 Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Resonance frequency and removal torque analysis of implants with turned and anodized surface oxides. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002;13:252-259   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Howlett CR, Zreiqat H, Odell R, Noorman J, Evan P, DaltonBA, Mcfarland C, Steele JG.The effect of magnesium ion implantation into alumina upon the adhesion of human bone-derived cells. J Mater Sci-Mater Med 1994;5:715-722   DOI   ScienceOn
10 Kim HM, Miyaji F, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Preparation of bioactive Ti and its alloys via simple chemical surface treatment. J Biomed Mater Res. 1996 ;32:409-417   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Norman GR, Streiner DL. Biostatistics, The bare essentials. Mosby. St. Louis, 1994. Chap. 11 repeated-Measures ANOVA. 88-94
12 Friberg, B., Sennerby, L., Linde'n, B., Grondahl, K. & Lekholm,U. Stability measurements of one-stage Branemark implants during healing in mandibles. A clinical resonance frequency study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1999:28;266–272   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
13 Zreiqat H, Howlett CR, Zannettino A, Evans P, Schulze-Tanzil G, Knabe C, Shakibaei M. Mechanisms of magnesium-stimulated adhesion of osteoblastic cells to commonly used orthopaedic implants. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;62:175-184   DOI   ScienceOn
14 Hanawa T, Kamiura Y, Yamamoto S, Kohgo T, Amemiya A, Ukai H, Murakami K, Asaoka K. Early bone formation around calcium-ion-implanted titanium inserted into rat tibia. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;36:131-136   DOI   ScienceOn
15 Sawase T, Wennerberg A, Baba K, Tsuboi Y, Sennerby L, Johansson CB, Albrektsson T.Application of oxygen ion implantation to titanium surfaces: effects on surface characteristics, corrosion resistance, and bone response.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2001;3:221-229   DOI   ScienceOn
16 Mueller WD, Gross U, Fritz T, Voigt C, Fischer P, Berger G. Evaluation of the interface between bone and titanium surfaces being blasted by aluminium oxide or bioceramic particles. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;3:349-356
17 Trisi P, Lazzara R, Rebaudi A, Rao W, Testori T, Porter SS. Bone-implant contact on machined and dual acid-etched surfaces after 2 months of healing in the human maxilla. J Periodontol 2003;74:945–956   DOI   PUBMED   ScienceOn
18 Sul YT, Johansson P, Chang BS, Jeong BY. Bone tissue responses to Mg-incorporated oxidized implants and machine-turned implants in the rabbit femur. J of appl Biomaterials and Biomechanics 2005;3:18-28
19 Parise LV, Phillips DR. Fibronectin-binding properties of the purified platelet glycoprotein Ⅱb-Ⅲa comples. J Biol Chem 1986;261:14011-14017   PUBMED
20 Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T, Albrektsson B, Krol JJ. Histomorphometric and removal torque study of screw-shaped titanium implants with three different surface topographies. Clin Oral Implant Res 1996; 6:24–30   DOI   ScienceOn
21 Piatelli M, Scarano A, Paolantonio M, Iezzi G, Petrone G, Piatelli A. Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits. J Oral Implantol 2002;28:2–88   DOI   ScienceOn
22 Gailit J, Ruoslahti E. Regulation of the fibronectin receptor affinity by divalent cations. J Biol Chem 1988;263:12927-12932   PUBMED
23 Krause A, Cowles EA, Gronowicz G. Integrin- mediated signaling in osteoblasts on titanium implant materials. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;52:738-747   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Albrektsson T, Wennerberg A. The impact of oral implants - past and future. 1966-2042 J Can Dent Assoc 2005;71:327
25 Martin JY, Schwartz Z, Hummert TW, Schraub DM, Simpson J, Lankford J, Dean DD, Cochran D, Boyan BD. Effect of titanium surface-roughness on proliferation, differentiation, and protein-synthesis of human osteoblast-like cells(MG63). J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:389-401   DOI   ScienceOn
26 Byon E, Moon S, Cho S, Jeong C, Jeong Y, Sul YT. Electrochemical property and apatite formation of metal ion implanted titanium for medical implants Surf. Coat. Technol. 2005; 200: 1018-1021   DOI   ScienceOn