Browse > Article

A Study on Shear Bond Strength of Core-veneer Interface for Bilayered all Ceramics  

Jung, Yong-Su (Department of Prosthodontics, College of dentistry, Wonkwang University)
Lee, Jin-Han (Department of Prosthodontics, College of dentistry, Wonkwang University)
Lee, Jae-In (Department of Prosthodontics, College of dentistry, Wonkwang University)
Dong, Jin-Keun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of dentistry, Wonkwang University)
Publication Information
Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science / v.24, no.3, 2008 , pp. 231-242 More about this Journal
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the bond strength of the core-veneer interface in all ceramic systems. Material and Methods: The all ceramic systems tested with their respective veneer were IPS Empress 2 with IPS Eris, IPS e.max Press with IPS e.max Ceram and IPS-e.max ZirCAD with IPS e.max Ceram. Cores (N=36, N=12/group, diameter: 10mm, thickness: 3mm) were fabricated according to the manufacturer's instruction and cleaned with ultrasonic cleaner. The veneer(diameter: 3mm, thickness: 2mm) were condensed in stainless steel mold and fired on to the core materials. After firing, they were again ultrasonically cleaned and embedded in acrylic resin. The specimens were stored in distilled water at $37^{\circ}C$ for 1 week. The specimens were placed in a mounting jig and subjected to shear force in a universal testing machine(Z020, Zwick, Germany). Load was applied at close to the core-veneer interface as possible with crosshead speed of 1.00mm/min until failure. Average shear bond strengths(MPa) were analyzed with a one-way analysis of variance and the Tukey test(${\alpha}=.05$). The failed specimens were examinated by scanning electron microscopy(JSM-6360, JEOL, Japan). The pattern of failure was classified as cohesive in core, cohesive in veneer, mixed or adhesive. Results: The mean shear bond strength($MPa{\pm}SD$) were IPS e.max Press $32.85{\pm}6.75MPa$, IPS Empress 2 $29.30{\pm}6.51MPa$, IPS e.max ZirCAD $28.10{\pm}4.28MPa$. IPS Empress 2, IPS e.max Press, IPS e.max ZirCAD were not significantly different from each others. Scanning electron microscopy examination revealed that adhesive failure did not occur in any all ceramic systems. IPS Empress 2 and IPS e.max Press exhibited cohesive failure in both the core and the veneer. IPS e.max ZirCAD exhibited cohesive failure in veneer and mixed failure.
Keywords
Bilayerd all ceramics; core-veneer interface; shear bond strength;
Citations & Related Records
Times Cited By KSCI : 1  (Citation Analysis)
연도 인용수 순위
1 Kingery WD, Bowen HK, Uhlmann DR. Introduction to ceramics. 1976;371
2 Dong JK, Luthy H. Wohlwend A, Scharer P. Heat- pressed ceramics: Technology and strength. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:9-16
3 Holand W. Materials science fundamentals of the IPS Empress 2 glass-ceramics. Ivoclar Vivadent Report 1998;12:3-10
4 Severance G. Introducing a lithium disilicate glass-ceramic : IPS Empress2. Signature 1999;4:1-3
5 Al-Dohan HM, Yaman P, Dennison JB, Razzoog ME, Lang BR. Shear strength of core-veneer interface in bi-layered ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:349- 355   DOI   ScienceOn
6 Kelly JR, Tesk JA, Sorensen JA. Failure of all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in vitro and in vivo: analysis and modeling. J Dent Res 1995;74:1253-8   DOI   ScienceOn
7 Al-shehri SA, Mohammed H, Wilson CA. Influence of lamination on the flexure strength of dental castable glass ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:23-8   DOI   ScienceOn
8 Smith TB, Kelly JR, Tesk JA. In vitro fracture behavior of ceramic and metal ceramic restorations. J Prosthodont 1994;3:138-144   DOI   ScienceOn
9 Luthardt RG, Sandkuhl O, Reitz B. Zirconia-TZP and alumina-advanced technologies for the manufacturing of single crowns. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1999:4:113-9
10 Fairhurst CW, Lockwood PE, Ringle RD, Twiggs SW. Dynamic fatigue of felsphatic porcelain. Dent Mater 1993;9:269-73   DOI   ScienceOn
11 Green DJ. An introduction to the mechanical properties of ceramics. 1998;Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
12 Marx R, Fischer H, Weber M, Jungwirth F. Crack parameters and Weibull moduli: subcritical crack growth and long term durability of all ceramic materials. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 2001;56:90-8
13 Anusavice KJ, Dehoff PH, Fairhurst CW. Comparative evaluation of ceramic-metal bond tests using finite element stress analysis. J Dent Res 1980;59:608-613   DOI   ScienceOn
14 McLean JW, Hughes H. The reinforcement of dental porcelain with ceramic oxides. Br Dent J 1966;119: 251-254
15 Mackert JR, Russell CM. Leucite crystallization during processing of a heat-pressed dental ceramics. 1996;9:261-265
16 Dundar M, Ozcan M, Comlekoglu E, Gingor MA, Artunc C. Bond strengths of veneering ceramics to rein forced ceramic core materials. Int J Prosthodont 2005;18:71-72
17 Guazzato M, Proos K, Sara G, Swain MV. Strength, reliability, and mode of fracture of bilayered porcelain/core ceramics. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17: 142-9
18 Blatz MB. Long-term clinical success of all-ceramics posterior restorations. Quintessence Int 2002;33:415- 426
19 Holand W. Schweiger M, Frank M, Rheinberger V. A comparison of the microstructure and properties of the IPS Empress 2 and the IPS Empress glass- ceramics. J Biomed Mater Res 2000;53:297-303   DOI   ScienceOn
20 Luthy H, Dong JK, Wohlwend A, Scharer P. Effects of veneering and glazing on the strength of heat pressed ceramics. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1993; 103:1257-1260
21 Schweiger M, Holand W, Frank M. IPS Empress 2: A new pressable high strength glass-ceramic for esthetic all-ceramic restorations. Quintessence Dent Technol 1999;22:143-151
22 Vita Zahnfabrik. Vita Hi-Ceram working instruction. Bad Sackingen, Germany, 1988
23 Kelly JR, Nishimura I, Campbell SD. Ceramics in dentistry: historical roots and current perspectives. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:18-32   DOI   ScienceOn
24 Sorensen JA, Cruz M, Mito WT. Research evaluations of a lithium disilicate restorative system : IPS Empress2. Signature 1999;4:4-10
25 Craig RG. Mechanical properties in restorative dental materials. 11th ed. New York: Mosby; 2002. p. 551-592
26 Rosenblum MA, Schulman A. A review of all- ceramic restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128: 297-307   DOI
27 Clause H. Vita In-Ceram a new system for producing aluminum oxide crown and bridge substructures. Quintessenz Zahntech 1990;16:35-46
28 Isqro G, Pallav P, van der Zel JM, Feilzer AJ. The influence of veneering porcelain and different surface treatments on the biaxial flexural strength of a heat-pressed ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90: 465-73   DOI   ScienceOn
29 Guazzato M, Albakry M, Ringer SP, Swain MV. Strength, Fracture toughness and microstructure of a selection af all ceramic materials. Part I. Pressable and alumina glass infiltrated ceramics. Dent Mater 2004;20:441-8   DOI   ScienceOn
30 Aboushelib M, Cornelis J. Leverlaan, Albert J. Feilzer. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Part II: Zirconia veneering ceramics. Dent Mater 2005;21:984-91   DOI   ScienceOn
31 Holaud W. Materials science fundamentals of the IPS Empress 2 glass-ceramic. Ivoclar Vivadent Report 1998;12:3-10
32 Jeong HC. Fracture strength of zirconia monolithic crowns. J Korean Acad Prosthodent 2006;44(2): 157-164   과학기술학회마을
33 Land CH. Porcelain dental art. Dent Cosmos 1903;45:437-44
34 Optec HSP Laboratory technique manual. Jeneric/ pentro Inc, Wallingford, Conn, January, 1988
35 Aboushelib M, De Jager N, Pallav P, Feilezer AJ. Microtensile bond strength of different components of core veneered all-ceramic restorations. Dent Mater 2005;21:984-91   DOI   ScienceOn
36 Ozcan M. Fracture reasons in ceramic-fused-to-metal restorations. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:265-269   DOI   ScienceOn
37 Albakry M, Guazzato M, Swain MV. Fracture toughness and hardness evaluation of three pressable all-ceramic dental materials. J Dentistry 2003;31: 181-8   DOI   ScienceOn